Background. Few women with locally advanced breast cancer remain disease‐free, even for 2 years. Response to induction chemotherapy may be associated with longer disease‐free and overall survival rates. The role of breast conservation in selected patients with response to induction chemotherapy was evaluated.
Methods. Since 1979, patients with Stages IIB and III breast cancer have undergone induction chemotherapy; patients with response continued chemotherapy until a plateau of regression was achieved. Before 1983, all patients having a response to chemotherapy underwent mastectomy; since 1983, selected patients have undergone breast conservation. Outcomes were tallied comparing these two groups of patients.
Results. The study group included 189 women, who were followed up for 12–159 months (median, 46 months) after diagnosis. Of the patients, 85% had a response to induction chemotherapy. Patients with no response were excluded from additional consideration in this study. One hundred three (64%) women underwent mastectomy; 55 (36%) were treated with breast conservation. The disease‐free 5‐year survival rate was 61% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy; 56% for those having mastectomy and 77% for those having breast conservation. The overall 5‐year survival rate was 69% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy, 67% for those undergoing mastectomy and 80% for those having breast conservation.
Conclusions. Induction chemotherapy achieves significant tumor regression in most women with locally advanced breast cancer, permitting subsequent breast conservation or mastectomy with a greater expectation of long‐term success. Breast conservation is used more frequently with the same expectation of success as mastectomy, presuming careful selection based on response to chemotherapy.
Eighty‐eight patients with localized unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas were treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between 1974 and 1981. Four treatment regimens were used which were sequential modifications of the technique based on the experience in the preceeding group of patients. Each treatment changed the course of the disease, and as patterns of failure were identified, the treatment was altered to deal with them. Initially, all patients were treated with external beam radiation. Subsequently, Iodine‐125 implantation was added to improve local control; low‐dose preoperative radiotherapy to reduce the risk of peritoneal seeding; and adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce the risks of distant metastases. The addition of 125I implantation increased the local control from 22% to 81%, but did not increase the median survival, which was unchanged from 7 months. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy increased the median survival from 7 months to 14 months, but had no impact on the control of the pancreatic tumor. Adjunctive chemotherapy and low‐dose preoperative radiotherapy appear synergistic in reducing the risk of peritoneal seeding. The combination of 125I implantation, external beam radiation, and adjunctive chemotherapy is safe and effective. This regimen produces excellent local control with acceptable morbidity. This regimen produced a 30% survival at 18 months. The patterns of failure among these patients suggest future modifications of the technique.
A group of 72 patients who had received radiotherapy between 1972 and 1980 for isolated local-regional recurrence of breast cancer was studied; 38 had received adjuvant chemotherapy and 34 had not. The two groups were comparable except for the initial nodal status and median time from mastectomy to recurrence. Outcome was not significantly different for the two groups in terms of response to radiotherapy, incidence of re-recurrence, distant metastases, and three-year survival. The length of the disease-free interval and the response to radiotherapy were the only factors studied that were significantly related to survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.