In this study the incidence and course of pleural effusions (parapneumonic effusions) in patients with acute bacterial pneumonia were prospectively evaluated. Bilateral decubitus chest x-ray films were obtained within 72 hours of admission in 203 patients with an acute febrile illness, purulent sputum and an infiltrate evident on the chest film. Ninety of the 203 patients (44 percent) had pleural effusions. Parapneumonic effusions, which required chest tubes for resolution and/or on which the pleural fluid cultures were positive, were classified as complicated parapneumonic effusions. The 10 patients with complicated parapneumonic effusions had clinical characteristics similar to the remainder of the group and could be separated from the 80 with uncomplicated effusions only by pleural fluid analysis. A pleural fluid pH below 7.00 and/or a glucose level below 40 mg/100 ml are indications for immediate tube thoracostomy. In patients with pleural fluid pH between 7.00 and 7.20 or lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) above 1,000 IU/1,000 ml, tube thoracostomy should be considered, but each case should be individualized; serial studies of the pleural fluid are useful in some of these cases. Patients with pleural fluid pH above 7.20 and pleural fluid LDH below 1,000 mg/100 ml rarely have complicated parapneumonic effusions and do not require serial therapeutic thoracenteses.

No abstract

Although severe impairment on routine pulmonary function tests will identify patients with a high post-thoracotomy morbidity, cardiopulmonary complications often develop in patients with only a mild-to-moderate impairment in pulmonary function. To determine whether the preoperative exercise capacity can prospectively identify those at risk of developing complications, 22 patients scheduled for thoracotomy (mean age, 55.7 +/- 2 yr) underwent an incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer to determine their maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) prior to thoracotomy. Routine pulmonary function tests were performed and postoperative forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was predicted from split function perfusion lung scan in all subjects. Eleven of the 22 patients had no cardiopulmonary complications postoperatively. The age, history of prior cardiovascular disease, degree of impairment on routine pulmonary function tests, and predicted postoperative FEV1 were similar in those who did and those who did not experience complications. However, those without complications had a significantly higher VO2max than did those who experienced complications (22.4 +/- 1.4 versus 14.9 +/- 0.9 ml/kg/min, p less than 0.001). Only 1 of 10 patients with a VO2max greater than 20 ml/kg/min had a complication, whereas all 6 patients with a VO2max less than 15 ml/kg/min had a complication. We conclude that exercise testing is a useful adjunct in the evaluation of operative risk for thoracotomy.

Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine.

No abstract

As the epidemiology of COVID-19 evolves, obstetric care providers and obstetric anesthesiologists must thoughtfully consider routine aspects of inpatient obstetric management and discuss alterations in practice to optimize the safety of our patients and staff. Hospitals should begin collaborations with others in their health region to optimize testing and clinical management protocols for pregnant and postpartum women in their geographic area. These recommendations are not proscriptive and may not apply in your clinical setting. They are intended to introduce concepts to be considered in each setting and give examples of current practices in place. This guidance will be updated as additional data and information emerge. Systems-Level Responses Level of Care Broader health systems and networks should coordinate to identify each hospital's capacity and plans for transferring care as needed to meet both maternal and fetal needs. Communication should frequently occur, as hospital capacities may change rapidly. Cohorting and Other Strategies for Exposure Mitigation One public health intervention to reduce exposure risk is cohorting-co-locating patients who are persons under investigation (PUI) and women who test positive for SARS-CoV2 into a restricted area of the hospital. While not all facilities are able to create an independent obstetrics COVID-19 unit, attempts should be made to designate specific locations for the purposes of containment, which will limit the exposure of unaffected patients and staff.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Early reports associating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with adverse pregnancy outcomes were biased by including only women with severe disease without controls. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) registry was created to compare peripartum outcomes and anesthetic utilization in women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection delivering at institutions with widespread testing. METHODS: Deliveries from 14 US medical centers, from March 19 to May 31, 2020, were included. Peripartum infection was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test within 14 days of delivery. Consecutive SARS-CoV-2–infected patients with randomly selected control patients were sampled (1:2 ratio) with controls delivering during the same day without a positive test. Outcomes were obstetric (eg, delivery mode, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and delivery <37 weeks), an adverse neonatal outcome composite measure (primary), and anesthetic utilization (eg, neuraxial labor analgesia and anesthesia). Outcomes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering within centers. Sensitivity analyses compared symptomatic and asymptomatic patients to controls. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred fifty four peripartum women were included: 490 with SARS-CoV-2 infection (176 [35.9%] symptomatic) and 964 were controls. SARS-CoV-2 patients were slightly younger, more likely nonnulliparous, nonwhite, and Hispanic than controls. They were more likely to have diabetes, obesity, or cardiac disease and less likely to have autoimmune disease. After adjustment for confounders, individuals experiencing SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibited an increased risk for delivery <37 weeks of gestation compared to controls, 73 (14.8%) vs 98 (10.2%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–2.09). Effect estimates for other obstetric outcomes and the neonatal composite outcome measure were not meaningfully different between SARS-CoV-2 patients versus controls. In sensitivity analyses, compared to controls, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 patients exhibited increases in cesarean delivery (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09–2.27), postpartum length of stay (aOR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18–2.60), and delivery <37 weeks of gestation (aOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.29–3.36). These adverse outcomes were not found in asymptomatic women versus controls. SARS-CoV-2 patients (asymptomatic and symptomatic) were less likely to receive neuraxial labor analgesia (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35–0.75) and more likely to receive general anesthesia for cesarean delivery (aOR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.40–9.74) due to maternal respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter US cohort study of women with and without peripartum SARS-CoV-2 infection, differences in obstetric and neonatal outcomes seem to be mostly driven by symptomatic patients. Lower utilization of neuraxial analgesia in laboring patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic infection compared to patients without infection requires further investigation.