Engraftment Syndrome (ES) maybe observed in patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplant (SCT). To investigate clinical criteria for ES diagnosis and analyse the risk factors for this complication, we reviewed all auto-SCT cases (Lymphoma and Myeloma) performed during the past 9 years at two tertiary care centres. We analysed all patients with a non-infectious fever, developed within 7 days of engraftment (first day of ANC of 500 on two consecutive days) in 178 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. A total of 46/178 (25.8%) patients developed non-infectious fever and one or more clinical signs of ES within 7 days of engraftment. In all, 29 (61%) fulfilled the Maiolino and 12 (26%) the Spitzer criteria. The incidence of engraftment syndrome using the Maiolino criteria in our study was 29 (15%), which compares well with Spanish study (13% using same criteria) and the original Maiolino study (20%). All patients with ES satisfactorily recovered and discharged with a median of 20 days from hospital. There was no significant difference in number of days of hospitalisation and days of antibiotics between the ES and non ES arms. All patients recovered without any morbidity and only 1 (2%) patient required readmission for fungal pneumonitis. 8 (17%) patients required ICU admission due to delay in initiation of steroids. None of the factors including number of chemotherapy cycles, conditioning regime, disease status, CD34 collection, growth factors and day of WBC engraftment except female ( = 0.064) were statistically significant (in univariate or multivariate analysis). Our study shows that engraftment syndrome is common in autologous transplant setting. Maiolino criteria to diagnose ES is more sensitive in our setting. If detected and treated early there is not much morbidity or mortality related to ES.

We compared the lomustine, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (LACE) and BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM) conditioning regimens for toxicity, engraftment kinetics, and efficacy in 139 patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for primary refractory or relapsed lymphoma. Ninety-two patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and 47 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled. Seventy-five patients received LACE while 64 received BEAM. The incidence of grade 3-4 oral mucositis (9 vs 38%; P < 0.001) and parenteral nutrition requirement (32 vs 69%; P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the LACE cohort. The median days to myeloid (10 vs 11; P = 0.007) and platelet engraftment (13 vs 15; P = 0.026) were shorter for the LACE cohort. Transplant-related mortality in the LACE group was 9% compared to 13% in patients treated with BEAM (P = NS). The probability of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years for entire cohort was 46 and 41%, respectively. Probability of OS (LACE 46% vs BEAM 47%; P = NS) and PFS (LACE 37% vs BEAM 47%; P = NS) at 5 years was comparable between two groups. We conclude that LACE has better toxicity profile compared to BEAM and results in similar long-term survival in primary refractory or relapsed lymphoma transplant.

No abstract

PURPOSE Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay is increasingly used in low-middle–income countries to detect clinically relevant genomic alterations despite its clinical benefits not being well known. Here, we describe the proportion of patients with advanced cancer in India who received targeted therapy for an actionable genetic alteration identified on CGP assays. METHODS This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in adult patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies who underwent a CGP test. If patients received a targeted therapy for ≥ 6 months, they were considered to have obtained a clinical benefit from the medication, whereas those continuing for ≥ 12 months were considered to have attained an exceptional response. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the proportion of patients with subsequent targeted therapy. RESULTS During 2019-2020, 12 medical oncologists provided CGP reports for 297 patients; 221 met the inclusion criteria. Patients received a median of two lines (range: 0-5) of prior systemic therapy. On the basis of the CGP assay, 21 patients (10%) received targeted therapy. Among them, 33% was for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification (nonbreast cancer) and 19% for HER2 or epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion mutation (lung cancer). After excluding patients with HER2 or epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertions, 8% of 217 patients received targeted therapy. In the overall cohort of 221 patients, clinical benefit was seen in nine patients (4%), of whom two were exceptional responders (1%). CONCLUSION We observed that in a low-middle–income country setting, 10% of patients received targeted therapy on the basis of CGP assay. Only 4% of patients who underwent CGP testing obtained a clinical benefit.