Proposal Generally, today's oil and gas projects are complex, high-risk, multidisciplinary ventures that require careful planning and precise implementation. A large number of interrelated factors and unforeseen (operational, technical and/or financial) events determine a drilling, completion, or work-over project's economic feasibility and ultimate success. Fundamental to the success of all project management is extensive economic modeling and risk analysis, since economic drivers and operational methods are developed from these processes. This paper will discuss the development of a new analytical technique that will systematically and intuitively overcome the hurdles mentioned previously while not compromising result sophistication. A variety of underbalanced drilling examples will illustrate its efficiency. This method will allow the end user, whether novice or expert, to quickly and effectively assess economic feasibility and risks. Introduction The scope and task of integrating a comprehensive set of various inputs must follow the model of a high quality Management System, one that is designed to meet Operations, Quality, and Health Safety & Environmental Management Systems needs. The basic premise of the management system model is to embed business practices in the way work is done. The project manager must have a process that links these fundamental requirements with their analytical consideration for financial risk1. Today, project managers are faced with a large amount of information from which to evaluate future prospects. The days of drilling a simple well have come and gone. Operators face tougher challenges and more uncertainties that can create more financial risk in the investments associated with new exploration. However, through the correct implementation of new technologies (i.e., Underbalanced Applications, Expandables, Rotary Steerables, etc.) greater opportunities exist to improve the return on investment. With these new technologies come greater risks in deciding which technology is best and which technology has the greatest potential for success. Project managers have relied on risk analysis to gain insight into potential hazards and lost benefits2,3. To date, the typical approach for handling such complexity has been 1) to abstract details by dividing the problem into a number of simplified components, and/or 2), to analyze these (usually univariate) models in relative isolation. Unfortunately, such an approach usually fails to effectively model real-life interactions. Industry analytical methodology traditionally follows a standard path of evaluating cash flow (i.e., tax calculations, inflation affects, multi-method depreciation and loan repayments), generating economic indicators (i.e., the process of transforming cash flow into single-quantity variables that capture economic worth, and include net present values, profit investment ratios, internal rate of return and pay-back periods), analyzing risk/uncertainty (i.e., applying discount rates, expected values, decision trees and probabilistic techniques such as Monte Carlo simulations), and finally, incorporating the affects of regional fiscal regimes. Previously, this has been difficult and necessitated individual analyses. Furthermore, the software tools were found to be difficult, inefficient, and cumbersome to the point that experts in the field of statistics and probabilistic modeling were required to interpret the complex and multivariate relationships developed during stochastic modeling. Often, the software tools were so problematic and inconsistent that the end user spent more time setting up and learning how to operate the software than using it, and generally, had to hire an expert to operate the software. It is generally accepted that these tools should help the project manager maximize the potential reward for the risked investment by using consistent mathematical solutions in an expeditious manner. An informed decision maker will more than likely make the right decision. Arguably, the benefit greatly outweighs the effort generally required to perform these analysis. However, managers still avoid the use of these tools.
Hydraulic fracturing treatments are often significantly impacted by near-well bore flow regimes that are not anticipated and usually unaccounted for. Identifying the existence of these unusual flow restrictions and quantifying their magnitude has been described in previous work done by Cleary et al. I This paper presents case histories showing the value of simple pumpin/shutdown tests before large-scale hydraulic fracture treatments to evaluate such near-well bore formation restrictions as tortuosity, existence of multiple fractures, and perforation friction, based on the previous work of Cleary et al. These case history evaluations have led to more predictable job outcomes. Testing includes step-down rate tests, water-hammer effects, and fluid efficiency test analysis. These tests are all conducted and analyzed before the treatment, on the day of the treatment.References at the end of the paper. 431
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractNuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) permeability combined with newly developed petrophysical analysis improves the candidate selection process for production-enhancement treatments such as matrix acidizing, acid fracturing, and traditional hydraulic proppant fracturing. The new petrophysical model allows automatic zoning based on log data such as permeability, stress contrasts, or lithology. The automatic zoning provides information for stimulation design, reservoir simulations, and economic forecasting.Traditional stress zoning, which has enabled widespread usage of 3D modeling for the design of stimulation treatments, is now enhanced by an accurate permeability profile and automatic zoning. NMR logging provides a continuous, highquality permeability that falls within the accuracy range required for 3D hydraulic-fracture design programs and reservoir simulators to predict production.Combining the stimulation design and productivity calculations allows the operator to select the ideal stimulation treatment for the highest return on investment. The automatic zoning enhances both the stimulation design and reservoir simulations with minimal time and effort, allowing the operator to determine the most economical production enhancement scenarios, such as treatment type and job size.Once the stimulation is performed, operators monitor the production rates and declines to enhance the process. Production data can lead to an improved NMR permeability by optimizing the permeability coefficients for area-specific permeability equations. The process is repeated for additional wells in the reservoir with the ultimate goal of optimizing the reservoir development.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractNuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) permeability combined with newly developed petrophysical analysis improves the candidate selection process for production-enhancement treatments such as matrix acidizing, acid fracturing, and traditional hydraulic proppant fracturing. The new petrophysical model allows automatic zoning based on log data such as permeability, stress contrasts, or lithology. The automatic zoning provides information for stimulation design, reservoir simulations, and economic forecasting.Traditional stress zoning, which has enabled widespread usage of 3D modeling for the design of stimulation treatments, is now enhanced by an accurate permeability profile and automatic zoning. NMR logging provides a continuous, highquality permeability that falls within the accuracy range required for 3D hydraulic-fracture design programs and reservoir simulators to predict production.Combining the stimulation design and productivity calculations allows the operator to select the ideal stimulation treatment for the highest return on investment. The automatic zoning enhances both the stimulation design and reservoir simulations with minimal time and effort, allowing the operator to determine the most economical production enhancement scenarios, such as treatment type and job size.Once the stimulation is performed, operators monitor the production rates and declines to enhance the process. Production data can lead to an improved NMR permeability by optimizing the permeability coefficients for area-specific permeability equations. The process is repeated for additional wells in the reservoir with the ultimate goal of optimizing the reservoir development.
Hydraulic fracturing treatments are often significantly impacted by near-well bore flow regimes that are not anticipated and usually unaccounted for. Identifying the existence of these unusual flow restrictions and quantifying their magnitude has been described in previous work done by Cleary et al. I This paper presents case histories showing the value of simple pumpin/shutdown tests before large-scale hydraulic fracture treatments to evaluate such near-well bore formation restrictions as tortuosity, existence of multiple fractures, and perforation friction, based on the previous work of Cleary et al. These case history evaluations have led to more predictable job outcomes. Testing includes step-down rate tests, water-hammer effects, and fluid efficiency test analysis. These tests are all conducted and analyzed before the treatment, on the day of the treatment.References at the end of the paper. 431
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.