Background Impaired vasodilator function is an early manifestation of coronary artery disease and may precede angiographic stenosis. It is unknown whether non-invasive assessment of coronary vasodilator function in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) carries incremental prognostic significance. Methods and Results 2783 consecutive patients referred for rest/stress PET were followed for a median of 1.4 years (inter-quartile range: 0.7–3.2 years). The extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities were quantified by visual evaluation of myocardial perfusion images (MPI). Rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) were calculated using factor analysis and a 2-compartment kinetic model, and were used to compute coronary flow reserve (CFR=stress/rest MBF). The primary endpoint was cardiac death. Overall 3-year cardiac mortality was 8.0%. The lowest tertile of CFR (<1.5) was associated with a 5.6-fold increase in the risk of cardiac death (95%CI 2.5–12.4, p<0.0001) compared to the highest tertile. Incorporation of CFR into cardiac death risk assessment models resulted in an increase in the c-index from 0.82 (95%CI 0.78–0.86) to 0.84 (95%CI 0.80–0.87, p=0.02) and in a net reclassification improvement (NRI) of 0.098 (95%CI 0.025–0.180). Addition of CFR resulted in correct reclassification of 34.8% of intermediate risk patients (NRI=0.487, 95%CI 0.262–0.731). Corresponding improvements in risk assessment for mortality from any cause were also demonstrated. Conclusions Non-invasive quantitative assessment of coronary vasodilator function using PET is a powerful, independent predictor of cardiac mortality in patients with known or suspected CAD and provides meaningful incremental risk stratification over clinical and gated MPI variables.

Objectives We sought to relate imaging findings on PET to adverse cardiac events in patients referred for evaluation of known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Background Although cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is commonly used to evaluate patients with suspected CS, the relationship between PET findings and clinical outcomes has not been reported. Methods We studied 118 consecutive patients with no history of CAD who were referred for PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) [to assess for inflammation] and 82Rubidium [to evaluate for perfusion defects (PD)] following a high fat / low carbohydrate diet to suppress normal myocardial glucose uptake. Blind reads of the PET data categorized cardiac findings as (a) normal; (b) positive PD or FDG; (c) positive PD and FDG. Images were also used to identify if findings for extra cardiac sarcoidosis were present. Adverse events (AE) -- death or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) -- were ascertained by electronic medical records, defibrillator interrogation, patient questionnaires and phone interviews. Results Among the 118 patients (age 52±11; males 57%, mean ejection fraction 47%±16%), 47 (40%) had normal and 71 (60%) abnormal cardiac PET findings. Over a median follow-up of 1.5 years, there were 31 (26%) adverse events (27 VT and 8 deaths). Cardiac PET findings were predictive of AE with the presence of both a PD and abnormal FDG (29% of patients) being associated with hazard ratio of 3.9 (p<0.01) and remaining significant after adjusting for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and clinical criteria. Extra-cardiac FDG uptake (26% of patients) was not associated with AE. Conclusions The presence of focal PD and FDG uptake on cardiac PET identifies patients at higher risk of death or VT. These findings offer prognostic value beyond Japanese clinical criteria, the presence of extra cardiac sarcoidosis and LVEF.

Background: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure. Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability. Results: The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality. Conclusions: The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.

On the basis of our review of more than 85,000 patients, we conclude that the absence of CAC is associated with a very low risk of future cardiovascular events, with modest incremental value of other diagnostic tests in this very low-risk group.

Aim: This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered. Structure: Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The “2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain” provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a prevalent and prognostically important finding in patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD). The relative extent to which CMD affects both genders is largely unknown. Methods and Results We investigated 405 men and 813 women referred for evaluation of suspected CAD with no previous history of CAD and no visual evidence of CAD on rest/stress positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was quantified and CFR<2.0 used to define the presence of CMD. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, late revascularization and hospitalization for heart failure, were assessed in blinded fashion over a median follow-up of 1.3 years (IQR 0.5–2.3 years). CMD was highly prevalent both in men and women (51% and 54%, respectively; P(Fisher exact test)=0.39; P(equivalence)=0.0002). Regardless of gender, CFR was a powerful incremental predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 0.80 [95% CI 0.75–086] per 10% increase in CFR; P<0.0001) and resulted in favorable net reclassification improvement (NRI=0.280 [95% CI 0.049–0.512]), after adjustment for clinical risk and ventricular function. In a subgroup (N=404; 307 female/97 male) without evidence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) on gated CT imaging, CMD was common in both genders, despite normal stress perfusion imaging and zero CAC (44% of men versus 48% of women; P(Fisher exact test)=0.56; P(equivalence)=0.041). Conclusions CMD is highly prevalent among at risk individuals and is associated with adverse outcomes regardless of gender. The high prevalence of CMD in both genders suggests that it may be a useful target for future therapeutic interventions.

Background Diabetes increases the risk of adverse cardiac outcomes and is considered a coronary artery disease (CAD) equivalent. We examined whether coronary vascular dysfunction, an early manifestation of CAD, accounts for increased risk among patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetics. Methods and Results 2783 consecutive patients (1172 diabetics and 1611 non-diabetics) underwent quantification of coronary flow reserve (CFR=stress divided by rest myocardial blood flow) by PET and were followed for a median of 1.4 years (Q1–Q3: 0.7–3.2). The primary endpoint was cardiac death. Impaired CFR (below the median) was associated with an adjusted 3.2 and 4.9-fold increase in the rate of cardiac death for diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively (p=0.0004). Addition of CFR to clinical and imaging risk models improved risk discrimination both diabetics and non-diabetics (c-index: 0.77 to 0.79, p=0.04, and 0.82 to 0.85, p=0.03, respectively). Diabetic patients without known CAD with impaired CFR experienced a rate of cardiac death comparable to that for non-diabetic patients with known CAD (2.8 vs 2.0%/year, P=0.33). Conversely, diabetics without known CAD and preserved CFR had very low annualized cardiac mortality, which was similar to patients without known CAD or diabetes and normal stress perfusion and systolic function (0.3 vs. 0.5%/year, P=0.65). Conclusions Coronary vasodilator dysfunction is a powerful, independent correlate of cardiac mortality among both diabetics and non-diabetics and provides meaningful incremental risk stratification. Among diabetic patients without CAD, those with impaired CFR have event rates comparable to patients with prior CAD while those with preserved CFR have event rates comparable to non-diabetics.

In symptomatic patients without overt CAD, impaired CFR was independently associated with diastolic dysfunction and adverse events, especially HFpEF hospitalization. The presence of both coronary microvascular and diastolic dysfunctions was associated with a markedly increased risk of HFpEF events.