Objectives: Older adults in skip-generation households (SGHs) play a valuable role in maintaining the cohesion of extended families in the absence of the middle generation. Little is known about the health and well-being of older adults in SGHs or how it varies depending on their age. This study aimed to examine 1) the association between living in SGHs and subjective health and wellbeing and 2) the association between subjective health and well-being of older adults in SGHs across age groups. Methods: Drawing data from the 2017 national survey of older people, older adults aged ≥60 years without disability in activities of daily living (n=38,088) were included for multiple regression analyses. Living arrangements were classified into SGHs and non-SGHs. Subjective health was evaluated based on self-rated health, whereas subjective well-being was evaluated using a happiness score. Ordinal logistic regression and linear regression models, stratified by age groups (young-old, 60-69; middle-old, 70-79; and old-old, ≥80), compared subjective health and well-being of older adults in SGHs and non-SHGs, while controlling for potential covariates. Results: Among older Thai adults, 10.1% lived in SGHs, and 11.1%, 9.5%, and 6.3% were among the young-old, middle-old, and old-old, respectively. Across age groups, older adults living in SGHs reported better health status but worse well-being than those living in non-SGHs. Older adults from the old-old group living in SGHs seemed to report the best health status, whereas those in the young-old and old-old groups tended to report the worst well-being. The direction of the association between living arrangements and subjective health and well-being did not differ by age group. Conclusion: Better health status but worse well-being were observed in SGHs. Social sectors should pay attention to the well-being of these older adults.
A substantial number of skipped generation households (SGHHs), where grandparents live with grandchildren in the absence of the middle generation, is observed in Thailand. The functional health (FH) of older adults with SGHHs is a concern because many of them take care of their grandchildren. While some studies have indicated the socioeconomic vulnerabilities of SGHHs, a social value on intergenerational exchange is considered favourable to SGHHs. This study examined the FH of older adults in SGHHs in comparison with those in other living arrangements, after adjusting for sociodemographic variables based on a population-based survey in Thailand. A total of 41,752adultsaged≥60 yearswereselectedfortheanalysisfromthe2017Surveyof OlderPersonsinThailand(SOPT).ThelivingarrangementsconsideredwereSGHHs, living alone, living with a spouse only and co-residing with children with or without grandchildren. The FH was evaluated based on basic activities of daily living (ADL), functional ability and instrumental ADL, and analysed according to living arrangements using multiple regression analysis. The proportion of older adults in SGHHs in Thailand was 8.9%. Among them, 72.9% were in rural areas, 88.7% did not attain primary education and 53.9% were in two poorer quintiles of wealth status. After adjustment for sociodemographic variables, the FH of older adults in SGHHs was significantly higher than that of those co-residing with children with or without grandchildren, but significantly lower than that of those living alone or with a spouse only.The study highlighted that despite better FH than those who co-reside with children, sociodemographic characteristics of older adults in SGHHs seem to be at a disadvantage. Attention should be paid to social services to help families in SGHHs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.