Plants have evolved specific photoreceptors that capture informational cues from sunlight. The phytochrome, cryptochrome, and UVR8 photoreceptors perceive red/far-red, blue/UV-A, and UV-B light, respectively, and control overlapping photomorphogenic responses important for plant growth and development. A major repressor of such photomorphogenic responses is the E3 ubiquitin ligase formed by CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) and SUPPRESSOR OF PHYA-105 (SPA) proteins, which acts by regulating the stability of photomorphogenesis-promoting transcription factors. The direct interaction of light-activated photoreceptors with the COP1/SPA complex represses its activity via nuclear exclusion of COP1, disruption of the COP1-SPA interaction, and/or SPA protein degradation. This process enables plants to integrate different light signals at the level of the COP1/SPA complex to enact appropriate photomorphogenic responses according to the light environment.

Ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation is an intrinsic fraction of sunlight that plants perceive through the UVR8 photoreceptor. UVR8 is a homodimer in its ground state that monomerizes upon UV-B photon absorption via distinct tryptophan residues. Monomeric UVR8 competitively binds to the substrate binding site of COP1, thus inhibiting its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity against target proteins, which include transcriptional regulators such as HY5. The UVR8–COP1 interaction also leads to the destabilization of PIF bHLH factor family members. Additionally, UVR8 directly interacts with and inhibits the DNA binding of a different set of transcription factors. Each of these UVR8 signaling mechanisms initiates nuclear gene expression changes leading to UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis and acclimation. The two WD40-repeat proteins RUP1 and RUP2 provide negative feedback regulation and inactivate UVR8 by facilitating redimerization. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms of the UVR8 pathway from UV-B perception and signal transduction to gene expression changes and physiological UV-B responses. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Plant Biology, Volume 72 is May 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Plants sense different parts of the sun's light spectrum using distinct photoreceptors, which signal through the E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1. Here, we analyze why many COP1‐interacting transcription factors and photoreceptors harbor sequence‐divergent Val‐Pro (VP) motifs that bind COP1 with different binding affinities. Crystal structures of the VP motifs of the UV‐B photoreceptor UVR8 and the transcription factor HY5 in complex with COP1, quantitative binding assays, and reverse genetic experiments together suggest that UVR8 and HY5 compete for COP1. Photoactivation of UVR8 leads to high‐affinity cooperative binding of its VP motif and its photosensing core to COP1, preventing COP1 binding to its substrate HY5. UVR8–VP motif chimeras suggest that UV‐B signaling specificity resides in the UVR8 photoreceptor core. Different COP1–VP peptide motif complexes highlight sequence fingerprints required for COP1 targeting. The blue‐light photoreceptors CRY1 and CRY2 also compete with transcription factors for COP1 binding using similar VP motifs. Thus, our work reveals that different photoreceptors and their signaling components compete for COP1 via a conserved mechanism to control different light signaling cascades.

Plants sense different parts of the sun's light spectrum using specialized photoreceptors, many of which signal through the E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1. Photoreceptor binding modulates COP1's ubiquitin ligase activity towards transcription factors. Here we analyze why many COP1-interacting transcription factors and photoreceptors harbor sequence-divergent Val-Pro (VP) peptide motifs. We demonstrate that VP motifs enable different light signaling components to bind to the WD40 domain of COP1 with various binding affinities. Crystal structures of the VP motifs of the UV-B photoreceptor UVR8 and the transcription factor HY5 in complex with COP1, quantitative binding assays and reverse genetic experiments together suggest that UVR8 and HY5 compete for the COP1 WD40 domain. Photoactivation of UVR8 leads to high-affinity cooperative binding of its VP domain and its photosensing core to COP1, interfering with the binding of COP1 to its substrate HY5. Functional UVR8 -VP motif chimeras suggest that UV-B signaling specificity resides in the UVR8 photoreceptor core, not its VP motif. Crystal structures of different COP1 -VP peptide complexes highlight sequence fingerprints required for COP1 targeting. The functionally distinct blue light receptors CRY1 and CRY2 also compete with downstream transcription factors for COP1 binding using similar VP-peptide motifs. Together, our work reveals that photoreceptors and

The plant ultraviolet-B (UV-B) photoreceptor UVR8 plays an important role in UV-B acclimation and survival. UV-B absorption by homodimeric UVR8 induces its monomerization and interaction with the E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1, leading ultimately to gene expression changes. UVR8 is inactivated through redimerization, facilitated by RUP1 and RUP2. Here, we describe a semidominant, hyperactive allele, namely uvr8-17D, that harbors a glycine-101 to serine mutation. UVR8G101S overexpression led to weak constitutive photomorphogenesis and extreme UV-B responsiveness. UVR8G101S was observed to be predominantly monomeric in vivo and, once activated by UV-B, was not efficiently inactivated. Analysis of a UVR8 crystal structure containing the G101S mutation revealed the distortion of a loop region normally involved in stabilization of the UVR8 homodimer. Plants expressing a UVR8 variant combining G101S with the previously described W285A mutation exhibited robust constitutive photomorphogenesis. This work provides further insight into UVR8 activation and inactivation mechanisms and describes a genetic tool for the manipulation of photomorphogenic responses.

SUMMARY Plants undergo photomorphogenic development in the presence of light. Photomorphogenesis is repressed by the E3 ubiquitin ligase CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1), which binds to substrates through their valine–proline (VP) motifs. The UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor senses UV‐B and inhibits COP1 through the cooperative binding of its own VP motif and photosensing core to COP1, thereby preventing COP1 binding to substrates, including the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcriptional regulator ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5). As a key promoter of visible light and UV‐B photomorphogenesis, HY5 requires coregulators for its function. The B‐box family transcription factors BBX20–BBX22 were recently described as HY5 rate‐limiting coactivators under red light, but their role in UVR8 signaling was unknown. Here we describe a hypermorphic bbx21‐3D mutant with enhanced photomorphogenesis, carrying a proline‐to‐leucine mutation at position 314 in the VP motif that impairs the interaction with and regulation by COP1. We show that BBX21 and BBX22 are UVR8‐dependently stabilized after UV‐B exposure, which is counteracted by a repressor induced by HY5/BBX activity. bbx20 bbx21 bbx22 mutants under UV‐B are impaired in hypocotyl growth inhibition, photoprotective pigment accumulation and the expression of several HY5‐dependent genes under continuous UV‐B, but the immediate induction of marker genes after exposure to UV‐B remains surprisingly rather unaffected. We conclude that BBX20–BBX22 contribute to HY5 activity in a subset of UV‐B responses, but that additional, presently unknown, coactivators for HY5 are functional in early UVR8 signaling.

Summary Light regulates the subcellular localization of plant photoreceptors, a key step in light signaling. Ultraviolet‐B radiation (UV‐B) induces the plant photoreceptor UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) nuclear accumulation, where it regulates photomorphogenesis. However, the molecular mechanism for the UV‐B‐regulated UVR8 nuclear localization dynamics is unknown. With fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), cell fractionation followed by immunoblotting and co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP) assays we tested the function of UVR8‐interacting proteins including CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1), REPRESSOR OF UV‐B PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS 1 (RUP1) and RUP2 in the regulation of UVR8 nuclear dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana. We showed that UV‐B‐induced rapid UVR8 nuclear translocation is independent of COP1, which previously was shown to be required for UV‐B‐induced UVR8 nuclear accumulation. Instead, we provide evidence that the UV‐B‐induced UVR8 homodimer‐to‐monomer photo‐switch and the concurrent size reduction of UVR8 enables its monomer nuclear translocation, most likely via free diffusion. Nuclear COP1 interacts with UV‐B‐activated UVR8 monomer, thereby promoting UVR8 nuclear retention. Conversely, RUP1and RUP2, whose expressions are induced by UV‐B, inhibit UVR8 nuclear retention via attenuating the UVR8–COP1 interaction, allowing UVR8 to exit the nucleus. Collectively, our data suggest that UV‐B‐induced monomerization of UVR8 promotes its nuclear translocation via free diffusion. In the nucleus, COP1 binding promotes UVR8 monomer nuclear retention, which is counterbalanced by the major negative regulators RUP1 and RUP2.

As sessile organisms, plants are subjected to fluctuating sunlight including potentially detrimental ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B). In Arabidopsis thaliana, experiments under controlled conditions have shown that UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) controls photomorphogenic responses for acclimation and tolerance to UV-B; however, its long-term impacts on plant performance remain poorly understood in naturally fluctuating environments. Here we quantified the survival and reproduction of different Arabidopsis mutant genotypes in diverse field and laboratory conditions. We found that uvr8 mutants produced more fruits than wild type in growth chambers with artificial low UV-B conditions but not in natural field conditions. Importantly, independent double mutants of UVR8 and the blue-light photoreceptor gene CRYPTOCHROME 1 (CRY1) in two genetic backgrounds showed a drastic reduction in fitness in the field. UV-B attenuation experiments in field conditions and supplemental UV-B in growth chambers demonstrated that UV-B caused the conditional cry1 uvr8 lethality phenotype. RNA sequencing in different conditions revealed a large number of genes with statistical interaction of UVR8 and CRY1 mutations in the presence of UV-B in the field. Among them, Gene Ontology analysis identified enrichment of categories related to UV-B response, oxidative stress, photoprotection and DNA damage repair. Our study demonstrates the functional importance of the UVR8-mediated response across life stages in natura, which is partially redundant with CRY1, and provides an integral picture of gene expression associated with plant environmental responses under diverse environmental conditions.