OBJECTIVE:The goal of the present study was to identify covariates and predictors of post-treatment weight reduction. To clarify the impact of the individual factors, we compared 'winners' (losing more than 2 BMI-points in the follow-up period) with 'losers' (gaining more than 2 BMI-points in the same time). DESIGN: In a questionnaire based study, we evaluated the psychological impact on eating behavior, general psychopathology and depressive symptoms at three points in time: three months prior to admission (T0), at the beginning (T1) and at the end of in-patient treatment (T2) as well as 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment (T3 -T5). SUBJECTS: One hundred and thirty eight obese patients (BMI < 30 kg=m 2 ) were recruited to the study. All patients participated in a multimodal in-patient treatment program over a period of 10 weeks. Treatment elements were cognitive behavioral therapy, movement therapy, and nutritional counseling. The aim of treatment was to regulate food intake, to minimize dysfunctional emotional influences on eating behavior, to enhance physical exercise and to treat comorbid psychiatric disorders. Twenty nine patients (13%) of the initial sample dropped out or were excluded during the treatment and post-treatment period. RESULTS: During in-patient treatment eating behavior improved and body weight decreased considerably in all patients. The weight reduction continued slightly in the follow-up period. Moreover, general psychopathology, depressive symptoms and eating behavior improved and remained stable during follow-up. These benefits were closely related to weight reduction. Neither eating behavior, nor eating related cognition nor psychopathology measured at T0 and T1 predicted long term success at T5. 'Winners' as compared to 'losers' at follow-up showed less psychopathology, less depressive symptoms and a less disturbed eating behavior. Already at discharge (T2), winners were less prone to eating triggered by external stimuli and reported fewer feelings of hunger. These differences predicted post-treatment weight reduction (T3 -T5). CONCLUSION: Reported feelings of hunger and the tendency to disinhibited eating behavior measured at discharge were able to predict post-treatment weight reduction in our sample. Patients suffering from a feeling of hunger during in-patient treatment were less likely to show further weight reduction in the follow-up period. Similarly, reduction of 'disinhibition' during treatment is a precondition for post-treatment weight loss.
Background: Predictors of treatment outcome were evaluated in a clinical sample suffering from hypochondriasis. Methods: The sample consisted of 96 patients with hypochondriacal disorder according to DSM-IV or high syndrome scores on the Illness Attitude Scales (IAS) or Whiteley Index (WI). After intense inpatient cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT), 60% of the patients were classified as responders because of substantial improvements or recovery from hypochondriacal symptomatology. Results: Non-responders were characterized by a higher degree of pre-treatment hypochondriasis, more somatization symptoms and general psychopathology (SCL-90R), more dysfunctional cognitions related to bodily functioning, higher levels of psychosocial impairments, and more utilization of the health care system as indicated by the number of hospital days and costs for inpatient treatments and medication. No predictive value was found for sociodemographic variables, comorbidity with other mental disorders and chronicity. Multiple linear regression showed that pre-treatment variables significantly predicted IAS scores at post-treatment (R2 = 0.59), changes during treatment (0.10), IAS scores at follow-up two years later (0.41) and changes between baseline and follow-up (0.25). Conclusions: The results demonstrate the relevance of various psychopathological variables and health care utilization as important indicators for outcome and further course of clinical hypochondriasis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.