This study provides evidence of a reversible suppression of ghrelin associated with obesity. The feasibility of measuring ghrelin in the circulation provides a new tool for the investigation of the complex hormonal regulation of appetite and energy balance.

Objective: To characterise plasma levels of the recently identified endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue receptor (ghrelin) during submaximal aerobic exercise in healthy adults and in GH-deficient adults. Design: Eight healthy males (mean^S.E. age, 40:8^2:9 years) and eight hypopituitary males with verified GH deficiency (mean^S.E. age, 40:8^4:7 years) underwent a baseline test of their peak aerobic capacity (VO 2 peak) and lactate threshold (LT) on a cycle ergometer, as well as an evaluation of body composition. The patients were then studied on two occasions in random order when they exercised for 45 min at their LT. On one occasion, GH replacement had been discontinued from the evening before, whereas on the other occasion they received their evening GH in addition to an intravenous infusion of GH (0.4 IU) during exercise the following day. The healthy subjects exercised at their LT on one occasion without GH. Results: The patients were significantly more obese and had lower VO 2 max (corrected for body weight) and LT as compared with the control subjects. Exercise induced a peak in serum GH concentrations after 45 min in the control group ð11:43^3:61 mg=lÞ: Infusion of GH in the patients resulted in a peak level after 45 min, whereas no increase was detected when exercising without GH (9:77^2:40 (GH) vs 0:11^0:07 mg=l (no GH)). Plasma ghrelin levels did not change significantly with time in either study, and no correlations were detected between ghrelin levels and parameters such as GH and IGF-I levels, age or body composition. Plasma ghrelin levels were significantly lower during the study period with GH as compared with the study with no GH. Conclusions: Submaximal aerobic exercise of an intensity sufficient to stimulate GH release was not associated with significant alterations in plasma ghrelin concentrations, which indicated that systemic ghrelin is not involved in the exercise-induced stimulation of GH secretion. The observation that ghrelin levels were lower during GH replacement suggests that GH may feedback-inhibit systemic ghrelin release.

Measurements of serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and related markers are routinely used in the diagnosis and treatment of GH deficiency and excess. The validity of these markers for assessment of exogenous GH exposure in healthy adults is, however, unknown. We therefore conducted a double blind, placebo-controlled GH treatment trial in 99 healthy subjects [49 women and 50 men; mean +/- SE age, 25.6+/-0.6 (women)/25.7+/-0.6 yr (men)]. Blood was collected weekly during a 4-week treatment period (days 1-28), and the subjects were subsequently followed for additional 8 weeks (days 29-84). The treatment arms included: I) 0.1 IU/kg x day GH (n = 30; GH 0.1), II) 0.2 IU/kg x day GH (n = 29; GH 0.2), and III) placebo (n = 40). At baseline no gender-specific differences existed, except that the acid-labile subunit (ALS) levels were higher in females. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels in males receiving GH increased significantly through day 42 with no significant difference between the 2 doses. The absolute IGF-I response was significantly lower in females, and there was a clear dose-response relationship. ALS levels in males increased through day 30 (P< 0.001). In females ALS levels were only modestly increased on day 28 compared with those in the placebo group (P < 0.02). IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels in males increased significantly in the GH 0.1 and the GH 0.2 groups on day 30 (P < 0.03), whereas no solid IGFBP-3 increase was detected in females. IGFBP-2 levels decreased insignificantly during GH exposure in both genders. A gender-specific upper normal range for each analyte was arbitrarily defined as 4 SD above the mean level at baseline. On the basis of IGF-I levels alone, GH exposure in the GH 0.2 group was detected in 86% of the males and in 50% of the females on day 21. On day 42 GH exposure was only weakly detectable in males and was not detectable in females. We conclude that 1) males are significantly more responsive than females to exogenous GH; 2) the increase in IGF-I is more robust compared with those in IGFBP-3 and ALS; 3) IGFBP-2 changes very little during GH treatment; and 4) among IGF-related substances, IGF-I is the most specific marker of supraphysiological GH exposure.

No abstract

The aim of the GH-2000 project is to develop a method for detecting GH doping among athletes. Previous papers in the GH-2000 project have proposed that a forthcoming method to detect GH doping will need specific components from the GH/IGF-I axis and bone markers because these specific variables seem more sensitive to exogenous GH than to exercise. The present study examined the responses of the serum concentrations of these specific variables to a maximum exercise test in elite athletes from selected sports. A total of 117 elite athletes (84 males and 33 females; mean age, 25 yr; range, 18-53 yr) from Denmark, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Sweden participated in the study. The serum concentrations of total GH, GH22 kDa, IGF-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-2, IGFBP-3, acid-labile subunit, procollagen type III (P-III-P), and the bone markers osteocalcin, carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), and carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen were measured. The maximum exercise test showed, in both genders, a peak concentration of total GH (P < 0.001) and GH22 kDa (P < 0.001) by the time exercise ended compared with baseline, and a subsequent decrease to baseline levels within 30-60 min after exercise. The mean time to peak value for total GH and GH22 kDa was significantly shorter in males than females (P < 0.001). The components of the IGF-I axis showed a similar pattern, with a peak value after exercise compared with baseline for IGF-I (P < 0.001, males and females); IGFBP-3 (P < 0.001, males and females); acid-labile subunit [P < 0.001, males; not significant (NS), females], and IGFBP-2 (P < 0.05, females; NS, males). The serum concentrations of the bone markers ICTP (P < 0.001, males; P < 0.05, females) and P-III-P (P < 0.001, males and females) increased in both genders, with a peak value in the direct post-exercise phase and a subsequent decrease to baseline levels or below within 120 min. The osteocalcin and propeptide of type I procollagen values did not change during the exercise test. Specific reference ranges for each variable in the GH/IGF-I axis and bone markers at specific time points are presented. Most of the variables correlated negatively with age. In summary, the maximum exercise test showed a rather uniform pattern, with peak concentrations of the GH/IGF-I axis hormones and the bone markers ICTP and P-III-P immediately after exercise, followed by a subsequent decrease to baseline levels. The time to peak value for total GH and GH22 kDa was significantly shorter for females compared with males. This paper presents reference ranges for each marker in each gender at specific time points in connection to a maximum exercise test to be used in the development of a test for detection of GH abuse in sports.