Resilience in load-carrying systems enables to avoid catastrophes by avoiding a complete failure especially of highly safety-relevant systems. For its realisation a resilience design methodology is being developed. As part of the methodology a procedure for deducing resilient coping strategies from functional resilience characteristics and system requirements is shown. Furthermore the synthesis of suitable functional structures based on the coping strategy is introduced. The functional structure can be described via an extended representation form for functional structures that allows to depict the superior coping strategy as well as a system adaptivity which is required for resilient properties.
During its life cycle, each engineering product goes through different stages of planning, production and usage. Uncertainties occur in all of these phases. As defined, uncertainties in technical systems are present as far as product and process properties are not determined and deviations of these properties arise. They result either from imperfect information about output values of production processes (regarding product properties) or in terms of diverging uses of the products. Especially within the product development process, the occurring uncertainties have to be taken into account. During the early design stages, decisions that have a variously strong impact on the future product are made. Moreover, the knowledge about a future product is still low so that neither the expected processes nor the product’s properties are known. For this reason, well-known methods of probabilistic uncertainty analysis are not sufficient. They cannot be applied until the product is completely defined. A comprehensive uncertainly analysis in the product development process can be executed in an integrated process model with the Uncertainly Mode and Effects Analysis Methodology (UMEA) [1]. The underlying model of uncertainly is the basis for a comprehensive and consistent classification of uncertainly, a distinction comparable to concepts such as reliability, availability, error or risk. The model to analyze uncertainty has been exercised using the example of the product development process according to Pahl/Beitz [2]. It enables the assignment of suitable methods for the classification of uncertainty at different stages in the design process and thus different levels of abstraction. Based on this model, the quantitative methods of the probability theory are complemented by qualitative concepts such as risk analysis methods, for example, FailureMode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Event Tree Analysis (ETA), or Hazard and Operability (HAZOP). The assignment of methods offers the possibility to analyze the classified uncertainties in the different phases of the product development process.
Today, a wide variety of methods to deal with uncertainty in load-carrying system exists. Thereby, uncertainty may result from not or only partially determined process properties. The present article proposes a classification of methods to control uncertainty in load-carrying systems from different disciplines within mechanical engineering. Therefore, several methods were collected, analysed and systematically classified concerning their characteristic into the proposed classification. First, the classification differs between degrees of uncertainty according to the model of uncertainty developed in the Collaborative Research Centre CRC 805. Second, the classification differs between the aim of the respective method to descriptive methods, evaluative methods or methods to design a system considering uncertainty. The classification should allow choosing appropriate methods during product and process development and thus to control uncertainty in a systematic and holistic approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.