PURPOSE To develop and test a deep learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme of mammograms for classifying between malignant and benign masses. METHODS An image dataset involving 560 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from digital mammograms was used. After down-sampling each ROI from 512×512 to 64×64 pixel size, we applied an 8 layer deep learning network that involves 3 pairs of convolution-max-pooling layers for automatic feature extraction and a multiple layer perceptron (MLP) classifier for feature categorization to process ROIs. The 3 pairs of convolution layers contain 20, 10, and 5 feature maps, respectively. Each convolution layer is connected with a max-pooling layer to improve the feature robustness. The output of the sixth layer is fully connected with a MLP classifier, which is composed of one hidden layer and one logistic regression layer. The network then generates a classification score to predict the likelihood of ROI depicting a malignant mass. A four-fold cross validation method was applied to train and test this deep learning network. RESULTS The results revealed that this CAD scheme yields an area under the receiver operation characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.696±0.044, 0.802±0.037, 0.836±0.036, and 0.822±0.035 for fold 1 to 4 testing datasets, respectively. The overall AUC of the entire dataset is 0.790±0.019. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a deep learning based CAD scheme to classify between malignant and benign breast masses without a lesion segmentation, image feature computation and selection process.
Purpose: To develop a new computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme using a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) approach for classification between the malignant and benign breast lesions depicted on the digital mammograms and assess CAD performance and reproducibility. Methods: An image dataset including 820 regions of interest (ROIs) was used. Among them, 431 ROIs depict malignant lesions and 389 depict benign lesions. After applying an image preprocessing process to define the lesion center, two image features were computed from each ROI. The first feature is an average pixel value of a mapped region generated using a watershed algorithm. The second feature is an average pixel value difference between a ROI's center region and the rest of the image. A two-step CBIR approach uses these two features sequentially to search for ten most similar reference ROIs for each queried ROI. A similarity based classification score was then computed to predict the likelihood of the queried ROI depicting a malignant lesion. To assess the reproducibility of the CAD scheme, we selected another independent testing dataset of 100 ROIs. For each ROI in the testing dataset, we added four randomly queried lesion center pixels and examined the variation of the classification scores. Results: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.962 ± 0.006 was obtained when applying a leave-one-out validation method to 820 ROIs. Using the independent testing dataset, the initial AUC value was 0.832 ± 0.040, and using the median classification score of each ROI with five queried seeds, AUC value increased to 0.878 ± 0.035. Conclusions: The authors demonstrated that (1) a simple and efficient CBIR scheme using two lesion density distribution related features achieved high performance in classifying breast lesions without actual lesion segmentation and (2) similar to the conventional CAD schemes using global optimization approaches, improving reproducibility is also one of the challenges in developing CAD schemes using a CBIR based regional optimization approach. C 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx
The purpose of this study is to develop and test a new content-based image retrieval (CBIR) scheme that enables to achieve higher reproducibility when it is implemented in an interactive computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system without significantly reducing lesion classification performance. This is a new Fourier transform based CBIR algorithm that determines image similarity of two regions of interest (ROI) based on the difference of average regional image pixel value distribution in two Fourier transform mapped images under comparison. A reference image database involving 227 ROIs depicting the verified soft-tissue breast lesions was used. For each testing ROI, the queried lesion center was systematically shifted from 10 to 50 pixels to simulate inter-user variation of querying suspicious lesion center when using an interactive CAD system. The lesion classification performance and reproducibility as the queried lesion center shift were assessed and compared among the three CBIR schemes based on Fourier transform, mutual information and Pearson correlation. Each CBIR scheme retrieved 10 most similar reference ROIs and computed a likelihood score of the queried ROI depicting a malignant lesion. The experimental results shown that three CBIR schemes yielded very comparable lesion classification performance as measured by the areas under ROC curves with the p-value greater than 0.498. However, the CBIR scheme using Fourier transform yielded the highest invariance to both queried lesion center shift and lesion size change. This study demonstrated the feasibility of improving robustness of the interactive CAD systems by adding a new Fourier transform based image feature to CBIR schemes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.