Summary
Background
Early‐transjugular intrahepatic porto‐systemic shunt (TIPSS) has been recommended in international guidelines for high‐risk patients with oesophageal variceal bleeding.
Aim
To validate the results of a previous randomised control trial which supports use of early‐TIPSS.
Methods
In a two‐centre open‐label parallel‐group randomised control trial, patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding were recruited following haemostasis with vaso‐active drugs and endoscopic band ligation. Participants were randomised to standard of care or early‐TIPSS. The primary outcome was 1‐year survival, secondary outcomes included early and late rebleeding, and complications of portal hypertension.
Results
Fifty‐eight patients (58 ± 11.12 years; 32.7% female) were randomised. After one year, seven patients died in the standard of care group and six in the early‐TIPSS group, a 1‐year survival of 75.9% vs 79.3% respectively (P = 0.79). Variceal rebleeding occurred in eight patients in the standard of care group compared with three patients in the early‐TIPSS group (P = 0.09). Not all participants randomised to early‐TIPSS received the intervention in time. For those receiving TIPSS per‐protocol, variceal rebleeding rates were reduced (0% vs 27.6%, P = 0.04) but this had no effect on survival (76.9% vs 75.9%, P = 0.91). Serious adverse events were similar in both treatment groups, except that rates of hepatic encephalopathy were higher in patients receiving TIPSS (46.1% vs 20.7%, P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Early‐TIPSS reduced variceal rebleeding, increased encephalopathy but had no effect on survival in high‐risk patients with oesophageal variceal bleeding. Early‐TIPSS may not be feasible in many centres however, larger studies are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT02377141.
The safety of carvedilol and other non-selective beta-blocker drugs in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites is still debated. In this study, we have shown that carvedilol therapy in these patients was associated with reduced risk of mortality, particularly in those with mild ascites. We concluded that low dose, chronic treatment with carvedilol in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites is not detrimental.
Summary
Background
Treating severe alcoholic hepatitis involves the exposure of patients to corticosteroids for 7 days to assess “response”.
Aim
To assess the prognostic and therapeutic implications of baseline neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis.
Methods
Patients recruited to the STOPAH trial and an independent validation group were analysed retrospectively. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) analysis was performed. Kaplan‐Meier analysis was used to assess survival. Log‐rank test and odds ratio (OR) were used for comparative analysis.
Results
Baseline NLR was available for 789 STOPAH patients. The AUC for NLR was modest for 90‐day outcome (0.660), but was associated with infection, acute kidney injury (AKI) and severity of alcoholic hepatitis. Ninety‐day survival was not affected by prednisolone treatment if NLR < 5 or > 8 but mortality was reduced with prednisolone treatment when the NLR was 5‐8 (21.0% cf. 34.5%; P = 0.012). Prednisolone treatment increased the chance of Lille response if the NLR was ≥ 5 (56.5% cf. 41.1%: P = 0.01; OR 1.86) but increased the risk of day 7 infection (17.3% cf. 7.4%: P = 0.006; OR 2.60) and AKI (20.8% cf. 7.0%: P = 0.008; OR 3.46) if the NLR was > 8. Incorporation of NLR into a modified Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score (mGAHS) improved the AUC to 0.783 and 0.739 for 28‐day and 90‐day outcome, respectively.
Conclusion
The NLR is associated with AKI and infection in severe alcoholic hepatitis. The NLR identifies those most likely to benefit from corticosteroids at baseline (NLR 5‐8). The mGAHS has a good predictive value for 28‐ and 90‐day outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.