Background
Right ventricular (RV) failure after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement is a serious complication and is difficult to predict. In the era of destination therapy and the total artificial heart, predicting post-LVAD RV failure requiring mechanical support is extremely important.
Methods
We reviewed patient characteristics, laboratory values, and hemodynamic data from 266 patients who underwent LVAD placement at the University of Pennsylvania from April 1995 to June 2007.
Results
Of 266 LVAD recipients, 99 required RV assist device (BiVAD) placement (37%). We compared 36 parameters between LVAD (n=167) and BiVAD patients (n=99) to determine preoperative risk factors for RV assist device (RVAD) need. By univariate analysis, 23 variables showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (P ≤ 0.05). By multivariate logistic regression, cardiac index ≤ 2.2 L/min·m2 (odds ratio [OR] 5.7), RV stroke work index ≤ 0.25 mmHg·mL/m2 (OR 5.1), severe preoperative RV dysfunction (OR 5.0), preoperative creatinine ≥ 1.9 mg/dL (OR 4.8), previous cardiac surgery (OR 4.5), and systolic blood pressure ≤ 96 mmHg (OR 2.9) were the best predictors of RVAD need.
Conclusions
The most significant predictors for RVAD need were cardiac index, RV stroke work index, severe preoperative RV dysfunction, creatinine, previous cardiac surgery, and systolic blood pressure. Using these, we constructed an algorithm which can predict which LVAD patients will require RVAD with greater than 80% sensitivity and specificity.
Objective
It is generally accepted that patients who require biventricular mechanical support (BiVAD) have poorer outcomes than those requiring isolated left ventricular support (LVAD). However, it is unknown how the timing of BiVAD insertion affects outcomes. We hypothesized that planned BiVAD insertion improves survival compared to delayed conversion of LVAD to BiVAD.
Methods
We reviewed and compared outcomes of 266 patients undergoing LVAD or BiVAD placement at the University of Pennsylvania from April 1995 to June 2007. We subdivided BiVAD patients into planned BiVAD (P-BiVAD) and delayed BiVAD (D-BiVAD) groups, based on the timing of RVAD insertion. We defined D-BiVAD as any failure of isolated LVAD support.
Results
Of 266 LVAD patients, 99 required BiVAD (37%). We compared preoperative characteristics, successful bridging to transplant, survival to hospital discharge, and Kaplan-Meier one-year survival between P-BiVAD (n=71) and D-BiVAD (n=28) groups. Preoperative comparison showed that patients who ultimately require biventricular support have similar preoperative status. LVAD (n=167) outcomes in all categories exceeded both P-BiVAD and D-BiVAD outcomes. Further, P-BiVAD patients had superior survival to discharge than D-BiVAD patients (51% v 29% p<0.05). One-year and long-term Kaplan-Meier survival distribution confirmed this finding. There was also a trend towards improved bridging to transplant in P-BiVAD (n=55) vs. D-BiVAD (n=22) patients (65% v 45% p=0.10).
Conclusion
When patients at risk for isolated LVAD support failure are identified, proceeding directly to BiVAD implantation is advised, as early institution of biventricular support results in dramatic improvement in survival.
Younger patients may be at increased risk for lower extremity arterial insufficiency with femoral cannulation for ECMO/CPS. Prophylactic or expectant SFA cannulation are reasonable approaches.
Background
The incidence and impact of clinical stroke and silent radiographic cerebral infarction complicating open surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are poorly characterized.
Methods and Results
We performed a prospective cohort study of subjects ≥ 65 years of age undergoing AVR for calcific aortic stenosis. Subjects were evaluated by neurologists pre-operatively and post-operatively, and underwent post-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Over a 4 year period, 196 subjects were enrolled at 2 sites. Mean age = 75.8 ± 6.2 years, 36% female, 6% non-white. Clinical strokes were detected in 17%, Transient Ischemic Attack in 2%, and in-hospital mortality was 5%. The frequency of stroke in the Society for Thoracic Surgery (STS) database in this cohort was 7%. Most strokes were mild; the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 3 (interquartile range 1 – 9). Clinical stroke was associated with increased length of stay, median 12 vs 10 days, p = 0.02. Moderate or severe stroke (NIHSS ≥10) occurred in 8 (4%) and was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality, 38% vs 4%, p = 0.005. Of the 109 stroke-free subjects with post-operative MRI, silent infarct was identified in 59 (54%). Silent infarct was not associated with in-hospital mortality or increased length of stay.
Conclusions
Clinical stroke after AVR was more common than previously reported, more than double for this same cohort in the STS database, and silent cerebral infarctions were detected in over half of patients undergoing AVR. Clinical stroke complicating AVR is associated with increased length of stay and mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.