Comparison of child growth patterns in 54 countries with WHO standards shows that growth faltering in early childhood is even more pronounced than suggested by previous analyses based on the National Center for Health Statistics reference. These findings confirm the need to scale up interventions during the window of opportunity defined by pregnancy and the first 2 years of life, including prevention of low birth weight and appropriate infant feeding practices.

ABSTRACT. Objective. It is widely assumed that growth faltering starts at around 3 months of age, but there has been no systematic assessment of its timing using representative national datasets from a variety of countries.Methodology. The World Health Organization Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition includes the results of 39 nationally representative datasets from recent surveys in developing countries. Based on these data, mean z scores of weight for age, length/height for age, and weight for length/height were compared with the National Center for Health Statistics and Cambridge growth references, for children younger than 60 months.Results. Mean weights start to falter at about 3 months of age and decline rapidly until about 12 months, with a markedly slower decline until about 18 to 19 months and a catch-up pattern after that. Growth faltering in weight for length/height is restricted to the first 15 months of life, followed by rapid improvement. For length/height for age, the global mean is surprisingly close to National Center for Health Statistics and Cambridge references at birth, but faltering starts immediately afterward, lasting well into the third year.Conclusions. These findings highlight the need for prenatal and early life interventions to prevent growth failure. Pediatrics 2001;107(5). URL: http://www. pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/5/e75; growth, body height, body weight, infant nutrition disorders, child nutrition disorders.ABBREVIATIONS. UNICEF, United Nations Children's Fund; WHO, World Health Organization; NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics; SD, standard deviation; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; IMCI, Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses. S tunting affects 182 million (33%) and being underweight affects 150 million (27%) of the world's children 1 ; these are associated with over half of the 10 million annual deaths of children under 5 years. 2 Developing countries account for almost all of this burden, with 70% of all early child mortality and malnutrition concentrated in subSaharan Africa and South Asia. Despite setting a goal of reducing malnutrition by 50% at the World Summit for Children, 3 few countries in these 2 regions will have been successful in achieving this goal by the end of the decade. It is our contention that one of the reasons for failure is the lack of clear definition and common understanding of what the problem is. The purpose of this article is to try to bring more clarity to these issues.Waterlow 4 proposed a functional classification for child malnutrition that separated children who had acute malnutrition from those with chronic malnutrition. The acutely malnourished children were those with adequate height for age but inadequate weight for height (wasted). The chronically malnourished children were those that had inadequate height for age (stunted). Chronically malnourished children could also be acutely malnourished, in which case they would be both stunted and wasted. The Waterlow Classification was c...

Table of Contents Summary86 1. Background88 1.1 History and development of growth monitoring programmes88 1.2 Objectives of growth monitoring89 2. Expected benefits of growth monitoring and growth promotion90 3. Objectives of this review91 4. Methodology91 5. Evidence of effectiveness of growth monitoring programmes91 5.1 Nutritional status and mortality of young children91  5.1.1 Studies before 199091  5.1.2 Studies since 199096 5.2 Utilization of primary health services103 6. Quality of implementation104 7. Caregivers' knowledge and understanding of growth charts105 8. Empowerment and community mobilization106 9. Coverage and attendance10710. Potential consequences if withdrawn10811. Feasibility and conditions under which growth monitoring and promotion can be expected to work10812. Cost‐effectiveness10913. Potential adverse consequences10914. Policy considerations and recommendations110References113 Summary The rationale for growth monitoring and promotion is persuasive but even in the 1980s the appropriateness of growth monitoring programmes was being questioned. The concerns centred largely around low participation rates, poor health worker performance and inadequacies in health system infrastructure that constrained effective growth‐promoting action. More recently there has been a call for a general review of the impact of large‐scale growth monitoring and promotion programmes to determine if the investments are justified. The launch of the new World Health Organization growth standard and charts has been a timely reminder of this debate. It is within this context that this review has been undertaken: the main purpose is to analyse the evidence that growth monitoring programmes are effective in conferring measurable benefits to the children for whom growth charts are kept. The benefits considered here are improved nutritional status, increased utilization of health services and reductions in mortality. There is evidence from small‐scale studies in Nigeria, Jamaica, India (Narangwal and Jamkhed), and from large programmes in Tanzania (Iringa), India (Tamil Nadu Integrated Nutrition Project), Madagascar and Senegal that children whose growth is monitored and whose mothers receive nutrition and health education and have access to basic child health services have a better nutritional status and/or survival than children who do not. There is tentative evidence from a large‐scale programme in Brazil (Ceara) that participation in growth monitoring confers a significant benefit on nutritional status independent of immunization and socio‐economic status. There is evidence from India (Integrated Child Development Services) and Bangladesh (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee and Bangladesh Integrated Nutrition Project) that growth monitoring has little or no effect on nutritional status in large‐scale programmes with weak nutrition counselling. There is evidence from Tamil Nadu in a randomized trial that when mothers are visited fortnightly at home and have unhurried counselling, no additional benefit accrues...

The prevalence of vitamin A (VA) deficiency, which affects about one-third of children in developing countries, is falling only slowly. This is despite extensive distribution and administration of periodic (4- to 6-monthly) high-dose VA capsules over the past 20 years, now covering a reported 80% of children in developing countries. This massive programme was motivated largely by an expectation of reducing child mortality, stemming from findings in the 1980s and early 90s. Efficacy trials since 1994 have in most cases not confirmed a mortality impact of VA capsules. Only one large scale programme evaluation has ever been published, which showed no impact on 1-6-year-old mortality (the DEVTA trial, ending in 2003, in Uttar Pradesh, India). Periodic high-dose VA capsules may have less relevance now with changing disease patterns (notably, reductions in measles and diarrhoea). High-dose VA 6-monthly does not reduce prevalence of the deficiency itself, estimated by low serum retinol. It is proposed that: (i) there is no longer any evidence that intermittent high-dose VA programmes are having any substantial mortality effect, perhaps due to changing disease patterns; (ii) frequent intakes of vitamin A in physiological doses -e.g. through food-based approaches, including fortification, and through regular low-dose supplementation-are highly effective in increasing serum retinol (SR) and reducing vitamin A deficiency; (iii) therefore a policy shift is needed, based on consideration of current evidence. A prudent phase-over is needed towards increasing frequent regular intakes of VA at physiological levels, daily or weekly, replacing the high-dose periodic capsule distribution programmes. Moving resources in this direction must happen sooner or later: it should be sooner.

This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank's Human Development Network (HDN). The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary and unpolished results on HNP topics to encourage discussion and debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. Enquiries about the series and submissions should be made directly to the Editor,

Objective: To outline a framework and a process for assessing the needs for capacity development to achieve nutrition objectives, particularly those targeting maternal and child undernutrition. Design: Commentary and conceptual framework. Setting: Low-and middle-income countries. Result: A global movement to invest in a package of essential nutrition interventions to reduce maternal and child undernutrition in low-and middle-income countries is building momentum. Capacity to act in nutrition is known to be minimal in most low-and middle-income countries, and there is a need for conceptual clarity about capacity development as a strategic construct and the processes required to realise the ability to achieve population nutrition and health objectives. The framework for nutrition capacity development proposed recognises capacity to be determined by a range of factors across at least four levels, including system, organisational, workforce and community levels. This framework provides a scaffolding to guide systematic assessment of capacity development needs which serves to inform strategic planning for capacity development. Conclusions: Capacity development is a critical prerequisite for achieving nutrition and health objectives, but is currently constrained by ambiguous and superficial conceptualisations of what capacity development involves and how it can be realised. The current paper provides a framework to assist this conceptualisation, encourage debate and ongoing refinement, and progress capacity development efforts.

Multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy could be an important intervention to help reduce stunting rates in Vietnam.

Background: From conception to 6 months of age, an infant is entirely dependent for its nutrition on the mother: via the placenta and then ideally via exclusive breastfeeding. This period of 15 months Á about 500 days Á is the most important and vulnerable in a child's life: it must be protected through policies supporting maternal nutrition and health. Those addressing nutritional status are discussed here. Objective and design: This paper aims to summarize research on policies and programs to protect women's nutrition in order to improve birth outcomes in low-and middle-income countries, based on studies of efficacy from the literature, and on effectiveness, globally and in selected countries involving in-depth data collection in communities in Ethiopia, India and Northern Nigeria. Results of this research have been published in the academic literature (more than 30 papers). The conclusions now need to be advocated to policy-makers. Results: The priority problems addressed are: intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), women's anemia, thinness, and stunting. The priority interventions that need to be widely expanded for women before and during pregnancy, are: supplementation with ironÁfolic acid or multiple micronutrients; expanding coverage of iodine fortification of salt particularly to remote areas and the poorest populations; targeted provision of balanced protein energy supplements when significant resources are available; reducing teenage pregnancies; increasing interpregnancy intervals through family planning programs; and building on conditional cash transfer programs, both to provide resources and as a platform for public education. All these have known efficacy but are of inadequate coverage and resourcing. The next steps are to overcome barriers to wide implementation, without which targets for maternal and child health and nutrition (e.g. by WHO) are unlikely to be met, especially in the poorest countries. Conclusions: This agenda requires policy decisions both at Ministry and donor levels, and throughout the administrative system. Evidence-based interventions are established as a basis for these decisions, there are clear advocacy messages, and there are no scientific reasons for delay.