We present a systematic review of the literature together with a proposed algorithm for diagnosis and management of these iliac flow limitations in endurance athletes.
Background: A policy of intra-operative transcranial Doppler (TCD) and completion angioscopy was previously associated with virtual abolition of intra-operative stroke (apparent upon recovery from anaesthesia) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aims of this study were to determine whether the prevalence of technical error has diminished with experience and whether our monitoring/quality control policy was still associated with low rates of intra-operative stroke 20 years after its introduction. Methods: Retrospective review of four consecutive cohorts of 400 patients undergoing CEA between October 1995 and March 2010 (1600 CEAS in total). Results: One hundred four patients (7%) had thrombus removed following angioscopy and prior to flow restoration, while 31 (2.1%) underwent repair of a distal intimal flap. The prevalence of intimal flaps diminished from 4.9% in the first 400 patients to 0.8% in the last 400 patients (p ϭ 0.006). By contrast, the prevalence of retained thrombus did not decline with experience (8.5%, 3.7%, 10.3% and 5.4% for the four consecutive periods). Intra-operative TCD and completion angioscopy was, however, associated with extremely low rates of intra-operative stroke (0.25%, 0.25%, 0.5% and 0.25% during the four study periods). Conclusion: Most intra-operative strokes probably follow embolisation of thrombus following restoration of flow. This can be prevented by angioscopy which has the advantage of being performed prior to flow restoration. Increasing experience was associated with a decline in the detection of intimal flaps, but not in the prevalence of retained thrombus. Even the most experienced of surgeons can still be responsible for inadvertent technical error.
Purpose: To assess energy and carbohydrate (CHO) availability and changes in blood hormones in 6 professional male cyclists over multiple single-day races. Methods: The authors collected weighed-food records, power-meter data, and morning body mass measurements across 8 d. CHO intakes were compared with contemporary guidelines. Energy availability (EA) was calculated as energy intake minus exercise energy expenditure, relative to fat-free mass (FFM). Skinfold thickness and blood metabolic and reproductive hormones were measured prestudy and poststudy. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Results: Body mass (P = .11) or skinfold thickness (P = .75) did not change across time, despite alternate-day low EA (14 [9] vs 57 [10] kcal·kg−1 FFM·d−1, race vs rest days, respectively; P < .001). Cyclists with extremely low EA on race days (<10 kcal·kg−1 FFM·d−1; n = 2) experienced a trend toward decreased testosterone (−14%) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (−25%), despite being high EA (>46 kcal·kg−1 FFM·d−1) on days between. CHO intakes were significantly higher on race versus rest days (10.7 [1.3] vs 6.4 [0.8] g·kg−1·d−1, respectively; P < .001). The cyclists reached contemporary prerace fueling targets (3.4 [0.7] g·kg−1·3 h−1 CHO; P = .24), while the execution of CHO guidelines during race (51 [9] g·h−1; P = .048) and within acute (1.6 [0.5] g·kg−1·3 h−1; P = .002) and prolonged (7.4 [1.0] g·kg−1·24 h−1; P = .002) postrace recovery was poor. Conclusions: The authors are the first to report the day-by-day periodization of energy and CHO in a small sample of professional cyclists. They also examined the logistics of conducting a field study under stressful conditions in which major cooperation from the subjects and team management is needed. Their commentary around these challenges and possible solutions is a major novelty of the article.
There is broad agreement about the presenting symptoms and the investigations required to confirm (or exclude) the diagnosis of iliac endofibrosis. There was consensus on the surgical approach to repair. Disagreement existed about the specific diagnostic criteria that should be applied during non-invasive testing and about post-operative care and resumption of exercise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.