Episodic memories initially require rapid synaptic plasticity within the hippocampus for their formation and are gradually consolidated in neocortical networks for permanent storage. However, the engrams and circuits that support neocortical memory consolidation remain unknown. We found that neocortical prefrontal memory engram cells, critical for remote contextual fear memory, were rapidly generated during initial learning via inputs from both hippocampal-entorhinal cortex and basolateral amygdala. After their generation, the prefrontal engram cells, with support from hippocampal memory engram cells, became functionally mature with time. Whereas hippocampal engram cells gradually became silent with time, engram cells in the basolateral amygdala, which were necessary for fear memory, are maintained. Our data provide new insights into the functional reorganization of engrams and circuits underlying systems consolidation of memory.Memories are thought to be initially stored within the hippocampal-entorhinal cortex (HPC-EC) (recent memory) and over-time are slowly consolidated within the neocortex for permanent storage (remote memory) (1-7). Systems memory consolidation models suggest that the interaction between the HPC-EC and the neocortex during and after an experience is crucial (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Experimentally, prolonged inhibition of hippocampal or neocortical networks during the consolidation period produces deficits in remote memory formation (13-15). However, little is known regarding specific neural circuit mechanisms underlying the formation and maturation of neocortical memories through interactions with the HPC-EC network. By employing activity-dependent cell labeling technology (16-18) combined with viral vector-based transgenic, anatomical (19, 20), and optogenetic strategies (19, 21) for We first traced entorhinal projections to frontal cortical structures (the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC), caudal anterior cingulate cortex (cACC), retrosplenial cortex (RSC)) involved in contextual fear memory, and the basolateral amygdala (BLA), with injections of the retrograde tracer cholera toxin subunit B (CTB)-Alexa555 into these regions ( fig. S1). CTB injections resulted in labeling in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) specifically in cells in layer Va (Fig. 1A-D, H and fig. S1A-D (Fig. 1F). Terminal inhibition during memory recall tests did not affect memory retrieval (Fig. 1G). Finally, terminal inhibition in the cACC or RSC during CFC or recall had no effect on memory throughout these periods (Fig. 1J-L and fig. S2G-I).The above results suggest that MEC-Va input into the PFC during CFC is crucial for the eventual formation of remote memory. This hypothesis was supported by several findings. First, CFC increased the number of c-Fos + cells in the PFC compared to that of homecage mice ( Fig. 1M-O), whereas context only exposure did not increase c-Fos activity in the PFC (Fig. 1O). Second, optogenetic terminal inhibition of MEC-Va projections within the PFC during CFC inhibited the observed incr...

Memories can be unreliable. We created a false memory in mice by optogenetically manipulating memory engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus. Dentate gyrus (DG) or CA1 neurons activated by exposure to a particular context were labeled with channelrhodopsin-2. These neurons were later optically reactivated during fear conditioning in a different context. The DG experimental group showed increased freezing in the original context, in which a foot shock was never delivered. The recall of this false memory was context-specific, activated similar downstream regions engaged during natural fear memory recall, and was also capable of driving an active fear response. Our data demonstrate that it is possible to generate an internally represented and behaviorally expressed fear memory via artificial means.

The synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis of protein synthesis-dependent long-term potentiation asserts that the induction of synaptic potentiation creates only the potential for a lasting change in synaptic efficacy, but not the commitment to such a change. Other neural activity, before or after induction, can also determine whether persistent change occurs. Recent findings, leading us to revise the original hypothesis, indicate that the induction of a local, synapse-specific 'tagged' state and the expression of long-term potentiation are dissociable. Additional observations suggest that there are major differences in the mechanisms of functional and structural plasticity. These advances call for a revised theory that incorporates the specific molecular and structural processes involved. Addressing the physiological relevance of previous in vitro findings, new behavioural studies have experimentally translated the hypothesis to learning and the consolidation of newly formed memories.