Purpose The location of a phosphorus emission can strongly affect its expected fate in freshwater. To date, in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), fate factors for phosphorus emissions have been derived for continents or large countries and had limited spatial resolution. These fate factors do not account sufficiently for local variations and are not applicable globally. In this paper, fate factors for freshwater eutrophication are derived for phosphorus emissions to freshwater on a global scale with a half-degree resolution. Methods For this purpose, a new global fate model for phosphorus has been developed on a half-degree resolution. The removal processes taken into account are grid-specific advection, phosphorus retention and water use. Aggregated fate factors based on archetypes and on administrative units are presented. Results and discussion The derived fate factors represent the persistence of phosphorus in the freshwater environment. The typical fate factor of phosphorus emissions to freshwater is 10 days and can vary more than 2 orders of magnitude among the grid cells (the 5th and 95th percentile are 0.8 and 310 days, respectively). Advection is the dominant removal process of phosphorus in freshwater (67.5%), followed by retention (27.6%) and water use (4.9%). ConclusionsThe results demonstrate inclusion of information on the location of phosphorus emissions to freshwater can improve the comparative power of the fate factor implementation in LCAs. The fate factors enable consistent assessment and comparison of freshwater eutrophication impacts at different locations across the globe.

Seaweeds are seen as important future feedstock for Europe, providing biomass for food, feed, and other applications. Seaweeds can contribute to a circular food system a protein transition and bio-based economy. Europe is a minor player in the world market dominated by the Asian producers and processors. According to the FAO, total production of aquatic plants (dominated by seaweed) was 30 million tonnes in 2016, with China (47.9%) and Indonesia (38, 7%) dominating production. This article discusses the challenges to seaweed production and use in Europe and formulates future directions for upscaling the European seaweed sector. From a People, Planet, Profit perspective, there is no need to focus on producing large volumes of seaweed per se. We need to focus on nature-inclusive production systems, producing the right amount of the right seaweeds, based on the carrying capacity of the European seas. The seaweed sector must avoid developing along the “old” economy’s way of cost leadership but develop along the way of the “new” circular economy. Seaweeds should not be seen as a new product “added” to the market but become an integral part of the European food system, being used for human consumption, feed and improving production processes.

No abstract

An exploratory Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was carried out to provide insight into the environmental impacts of using the green seaweed Ulva spp. as a feedstock, for production of bioplastic. The study focused on the production of lactic acid as a precursor of polylactic acid. The study was on the production process: (1) The cultivation of Ulva spp., in an Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture system; (2) the processing of the biomass for solubilization of sugars;(3) the fermentation of the sugars to lactic acid; (4) the isolation of lactic acid from fermentation broth. The study identified environmental hotspots and compared an experimental seaweed production chain with conventional feedstocks. The main hotspot is derived from electricity consumption during seaweed cultivation. The impact of electricity consumption can be lowered by reducing energy use and sourcing renewable energy, and by improving the material efficiency in the product chain. To improve understanding of the process of production's environmental impacts, future studies should broaden the system boundaries and scope of sustainability issues included in the environmental assessment.