International agreements combined with the recent Chilean Forestry Policy (2015-2035) represent a challenge and an opportunity for forest landscape restoration in Chile. Nevertheless, restoring over 500,000 ha using mainly native species seems like a daunting task by 2035. Here, we discuss the three major bottlenecks that currently constrain the restoration efforts of forest ecosystems in Chile. First, Chile urgently needs a national strategic plan for forest landscape restoration, which should take into account mid-and long-term goals. There is also a need to prioritize resource allocation for efficient use, promoting the creation of economic subsidies for restoration that consider different types of forest ecosystems. Second, there is a great need for better nursery protocols in plant production as well as to strengthen educational programs for professional and technical training, given the lack of high-quality personnel in Chilean nurseries. This would help increase the currently limited national plant supply, improving quality and increasing the diversity of native species suitable for forest restoration. Lastly, taking advantage of novel eco-technological tools and promoting innovative plantation design would help to overcome the usually deficient results in the establishment phase, leading to higher survival rates and promoting better performance of native species. Beyond current experiments that are relatively efficient on a small spatial scale, the practice of forest restoration needs to become massive and successful at a landscape scale. More and better applied research is crucial for improving the impact of forest landscape restoration, so that Chile can achieve its forest restoration challenge in the next decade.

Oak species (Quercus spp.) in Central Europe grow on a relatively wide range of sites. Due to the economic importance of oak for its wood and other products, oak forests have long been managed by humans. This raises the question whether adaptation and/or human activities-especially the moving of propagules-have left their footprints on the genetic variation of oak populations. To address this question, we focused on the Upper Rhine Valley, a densely populated area today that was settled by humans early on. Here, the three most common native Central European oak species can be found. We studied their genetic variation across a large number of oak stands, growing on different sites and having different silvicultural histories, using neutral and EST-derived microsatellite markers. At the interspecific level, we showed that Quercus robur is relatively well delimited, while Quercus petraea and Quercus pubescens are more closely related. Natural hybridization might explain the increased genetic introgression between these two species. Within species, we found a low differentiation among populations of Q. robur and Q. petraea. In spite of forest fragmentation, we detected no spatial genetic barriers. However, we found that populations of Q. pubescens, a species with a marginal distribution in the study area were spatially structured. Genetic drift but also unidirectional introgressive hybridization with Q. petraea may account for this. Regarding the question of adaptation, we considered soil flooding, texture, drainage, and calcium carbonate in the upper horizons as physiologically important site condition variables. But with multivariate statistics, we could not find any significant effects of these parameters on genetic differentiation. Although there was no evidence for natural selection due to adaptation in stands of Q. robur, we demonstrated that age had a significant effect on their genetic variation and that stands established after the end of the Second World War had higher genetic diversity. We interpret these findings as being the result of an increase in large-scale transfers of reproductive materials during this time period and discuss arguments supporting this hypothesis. Finally, we consider the implications of these results for forest management.

no pasa nada Purpose of Review Growth equations have been widely used in forest research, commonly to assess ecosystemlevel behaviour and forest management. Nevertheless, the large number of growth equations has obscured the growth-rate behaviour of each of these equations and several different terms for referring to common phenomena. This review presents a unified mathematical treatment of growth-rates besides several well-known growth equations by giving their mathematical basis and representing their behaviour using tree growth data as an example.Recent Findings We highlight the mathematical differences among several growth equations that can be better understood by using their differential equations forms rather than their integrated forms. Moreover, the assumed-and-claimed biological basis of these growthrate models has been taken too seriously in forest research. The focus should be on using a plausible equation for the organism being modelled. We point out that more attention should be drawn to parameter estima-