Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and contraindications to surgery. The procedure has shown to improve patient's quality of life and prolong short-and mid-term survival in high-risk individuals, becoming a widely accepted therapeutic option which has been integrated into current clinical guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Nevertheless, not every patient at high-risk for surgery is a good candidate for TAVR. Besides clinical selection, which is usually established by the Heart Team, certain technical and anatomic criteria must be met as, unlike in surgical valve replacement, annular sizing is not performed under direct surgical evaluation but on the basis of non-invasive imaging findings. Present consensus document was outlined by a working group of researchers from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) and aims to provide guidance on the utilisation of CT and MR imaging prior to TAVR. Particular relevance is given to the technical requirements and standardisation of the scanning protocols which have to be tailored to the remarkable variability of the scanners currently utilised in clinical practice; recommendations regarding all required pre-procedural measurements and medical reporting standardisation have been also outlined, in order to ensure quality and consistency of reported data and terminology. Key Points • To provide a reference document for CT and MR acquisition techniques, taking into account the significant technological variation of available scanners. • To review all relevant measurements that are required and define a step-by-step guided approach for the measurements of different structures implicated in the procedure. • To propose a CT/MR reporting template to assist in consistent communication between various sites and specialists involved in the procedural planning.

No abstract

Multidetector CT angiography (CTA) has become a widely accepted examination for non-invasive evaluation of the heart and coronary arteries. Despite its ongoing success and worldwide clinical implementation, it remains an often-challenging procedure in which image quality, and hence diagnostic value, is determined by both technical and patient-related factors. Thorough knowledge of these factors is important to obtain high-quality examinations. In this review, we discuss several key elements that may adversely affect coronary CTA image quality as well as potential measures that can be taken to mitigate their impact. In addition, several recent vendor-specific advances and future directions to improve image quality are discussed. INTRODUCTIONThe high negative-predictive value of coronary CT angiography (CTA) makes it a suitable tool for excluding significant coronary artery disease.1 Coronary CTA is technically complex and places a greater emphasis on scanning technologies than any other type of CT examination. Indeed, coronary arteries both have small calibre and varying degrees of motion during the cardiac cycle.2 Image quality can be degraded by many patient-and technique-related factors. Image artefacts are causes for misinterpretation, making the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA to a great extent dependent on their recognition and operator-awareness.2,3 Potential problems related to these artefacts include insufficient tissue contrast, limited spatial and temporal resolution and inadequate volume coverage. The aim of this review was to discuss these technical issues, important recent vendorspecific solutions as well as future directions.

A publicly available standardized framework for the evaluation of (semi)automatic methods for CAC identification in cardiac CT is described. An evaluation of five (semi)automatic methods within this framework shows that automatic per patient CVD risk categorization is feasible. CAC lesions at ambiguous locations such as the coronary ostia remain challenging, but their detection had limited impact on CVD risk determination.

Background: The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in moderately severe COPD patients remains unclear. At the same time, the use of extrafine particles in COPD patients is a topic of ongoing research. Objectives: This study assessed the effect of ICS in steroid-naïve mild COPD patients and the effect of reducing the ICS dose in more severe COPD patients previously using ICS when switching to an extrafine particle BDP/F formulation (Foster using Modulite technology, Chiesi Pharmaceutici, Parma, Italy). Methods: Novel functional respiratory imaging (FRI) methods, consisting of multi-slice CT scans and Computational Fluid Dynamics, were used in combination with conventional pulmonary function tests and patient reported outcomes. Results: The study showed that the administration of extrafine BDP/F after 4-6 h led to a significant improvement in lung function parameters and hyperinflation as determined by spirometry, body plethysmography, and functional respiratory imaging. After 6 months of treatment, it was observed that, compared to baseline, the hyperinflation on lobar level at total lung capacity was significantly reduced (-1.19 -7.19 %p, p¼0.009). In addition, a significant improvement in SGRQ symptom score was noted in the entire patient population. Patients who improved in terms of hyperinflation also improved their MMRC dyspnea score. CFD indicated a difference in regional deposition between extrafine and non-extrafine formulations with -11% extrathoracic deposition and up to + 4% lobe deposition for the extrafine formulation. Conclusions: The study showed that the administration of extrafine BDP/F improved lung function parameters and hyperinflation. Patients previously treated with ICS remained stable despite the lower dose, while ICS naïve patients improved in terms of lobar hyperinflation. FRI seems to be a sensitive biomarker to detect clinically relevant changes that are not detected by spirometry. The next step is to confirm these findings in a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:The purpose of this work was to evaluate the possible use of low-dose multidetector CT (MDCT) in cervical clearance of patients with blunt trauma.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic currently constitutes a significant burden on worldwide health care systems, with important implications on many levels, including radiology departments. Given the established fundamental role of cardiovascular imaging in modern healthcare, and the specific value of cardiopulmonary radiology in COVID-19 patients, departmental organisation and imaging programs need to be restructured during the pandemic in order to provide access to modern cardiovascular services to both infected and non-infected patients while ensuring safety for healthcare professionals. The uninterrupted availability of cardiovascular radiology services remains, particularly during the current pandemic outbreak, crucial for the initial evaluation and further follow-up of patients with suspected or known cardiovascular diseases in order to avoid unnecessary complications. Suspected or established COVID-19 patients may also have concomitant cardiovascular symptoms and require further imaging investigations. This statement by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) provides information on measures for safety of healthcare professionals and recommendations for cardiovascular imaging during the pandemic in both non-infected and COVID-19 patients.

No abstract