1Spatial isolation can differentially affect the distribution of predators and thus affect lower 2 trophic levels by resulting in trophic cascades. Similarly, the introduction of top predators into 3 isolated ecosystems can cause the same cascading effects because they mostly prey upon larger 4 frequently predatory taxa, indirectly benefiting consumers. Here we experimentally tested 5 whether spatial isolation can affect the outcome and strength of the cascading effects caused by 6 fish on macroinvertebrate community structure. We found that fish did reduce the abundance of 7 predators but had no effect on consumers. Spatial isolation, however, did cause trophic cascades, 8 but only in the absence of fish. We believe this happened because fish also preyed upon 9 consumers when they increase in abundance. Additionally, and in contrast with simple 10 theoretical expectations for metacommunities, we found that the difference between ponds with 11 and without fish increased with isolation, probably because fish dampened the cascading effects 12 of spatial isolation. 13

Because of their strong dependence on the environment, the spatial distribution of pond-breeding amphibians can be greatly influenced by anthropogenic habitat alteration. In some agricultural landscapes in Brazil, the anuran Pseudopaludicola mystacalis appears to be highly influenced by land use. Because adult males and tadpoles of this species are usually found in marshy areas with cattle hoof prints, we hypothesized that P. mystacalis preferentially occupies aquatic habitats with marshy areas that are trampled by cattle. To test our hypothesis, we assessed whether the occurrence of P. mystacalis is associated with the presence of cattle and trampled marshy areas, and which environmental features best explain the spatial distribution and abundance of P. mystacalis. To do so, we sampled 38 aquatic habitats in an area intensely used for livestock in southeastern Brazil. We found that the presence of cattle and trampled marshy areas in aquatic habitats are positively associated to P. mystacalis occurrence. Additionally, the abundance of calling males is better predicted by variables of landscape and local habitat structure. Specifically, the size of trampled marshy areas and the proportion of herbaceous vegetation within the aquatic habitat are positively associated with abundance, while distance to nearest aquatic habitat are negatively associated with abundance of calling males. All three of these variables can be directly or indirectly linked to the presence of cattle or grazing management. Therefore, this work shows evidence that Pseudopaludicola mystacalis is positively influenced by grazing management with cattle, and draws attention to other unknown potential consequences of different land use to fresh water diversity.

Current conceptual metacommunity models predict that the consequences of local selective pressures on community structure increase with spatial isolation when species favored by local conditions also have higher dispersal rates. This appears to be the case of freshwater insects in the presence of fish. The introduction of predatory fish can produce trophic cascades in freshwater habitats because fish tend to prey upon intermediate predatory taxa, such as predatory insects, indirectly benefiting herbivores and detritivores. Similarly, spatial isolation can limit dispersal and colonization rates of predatory insects more strongly than of herbivores and detritivores, thus generating similar cascading effects. Here we tested the hypothesis that the effect of introduced predatory fish on insect community structure increases with spatial isolation by conducting a field experiment in artificial ponds that manipulated the presence/absence of fish (the redbreast tilapia) at three different distances from a source wetland. Our results showed that fish have direct negative effects on the abundance of predatory insects but probably have variable net effects on the abundance of herbivores and detritivores because the direct negative effects of predation by fish may offset indirect positive ones. Spatial isolation also resulted in indirect positive effects on the abundance of herbivores and detritivores but this effect was stronger in the absence rather than in the presence of fish so that insect communities diverged more strongly between fish and fishless ponds at higher spatial isolation. We argue that an important additional mechanism, ignored in our initial hypothesis, was that as spatial isolation increases fish predation pressure upon herbivores and detritivores increases due to the relative scarcity of predatory insects, thus dampening the positive effect that spatial isolation confers to lower trophic levels. Our results highlight the importance of considering interspecific variation in dispersal and multiple trophic levels to better understand the processes generating community and metacommunity patterns.

No abstract

Many lentic aquatic environments are found embedded in agricultural fields, forming complex metacommunity structures. These habitats are vulnerable to contamination by agrochemicals, which can differentially affect local communities depending on the intensity and variability of species dispersal rates. We conducted a field experiment to assess how agrochemical intensification simulating the conversion of savannas into managed pastures and sugarcane fields affects freshwater community structure at different levels of spatial isolation. We constructed forty-five 1,200-L artificial ponds in a savanna landscape at three distances from a source wetland (30 m, 120 m, and 480 m). Ponds were spontaneously colonized by aquatic insects and amphibians and treated with no agrochemicals (savanna treatment), fertilizers (pasture treatment), or fertilizers and a single pulse of the insecticide fipronil and the herbicide 2,4-D (sugarcane treatment) following realistic dosages and application schedules. The experiment encompassed the entire rainy season. Pasture communities were only slightly different from controls largely because two predatory insect taxa were more abundant in pasture ponds. Sugarcane communities strongly diverged from other treatments after the insecticide application, when a decrease in insect abundance indirectly benefitted amphibian populations. However, this effect had nearly disappeared by the end of the rainy season. The herbicide pulse had no effect on community structure. Spatial isolation changed community structure by increasing the abundance of non-predatory insects. However, it did not affect all predatory insects nor, surprisingly, amphibians. Therefore, spatial isolation did not change the effects of agrochemicals on community structure. Because agrochemical application frequently overlaps with the rainy season in many monocultures, it can strongly affect temporary pond communities. Ponds embedded in pastures might suffer mild consequences of fertilization by favoring the abundance of few predators through bottom-up effects. Ponds in sugarcane fields, however, might experience a decline in the insect population, followed by an increase in the abundance of amphibians tolerant to environmental degradation. Furthermore, we found no evidence that isolation by distance can change the general effects of chemical intensification, but future experiments should consider using real crop fields as the terrestrial matrix since they can represent different dispersal barriers.