Background Consensus criteria for classifying tremor disorders were published by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society in 1998. Subsequent advances with regard to essential tremor, tremor associated with dystonia, and other monosymptomatic and indeterminate tremors make a significant revision necessary. Objectives Convene an international panel of experienced investigators to review the definition and classification of tremor. Methods Computerized MEDLINE searches in January 2013 and 2015 were conducted using a combination of text words and MeSH terms: “tremor”, “tremor disorders”, “essential tremor”, “dystonic tremor”, and “classification” limited to human studies. Agreement was obtained using consensus development methodology during four in‐person meetings, two teleconferences, and numerous manuscript reviews. Results Tremor is defined as an involuntary, rhythmic, oscillatory movement of a body part and is classified along two axes: Axis 1—clinical characteristics, including historical features (age at onset, family history, and temporal evolution), tremor characteristics (body distribution, activation condition), associated signs (systemic, neurological), and laboratory tests (electrophysiology, imaging); and Axis 2—etiology (acquired, genetic, or idiopathic). Tremor syndromes, consisting of either isolated tremor or tremor combined with other clinical features, are defined within Axis 1. This classification scheme retains the currently accepted tremor syndromes, including essential tremor, and provides a framework for defining new syndromes. Conclusions This approach should be particularly useful in elucidating isolated tremor syndromes and syndromes consisting of tremor and other signs of uncertain significance. Consistently defined Axis 1 syndromes are needed to facilitate the elucidation of specific etiologies in Axis 2. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

No abstract

Although conclusions are limited by small sample size and the possibility of a type II error, results suggest that short-term estrogen therapy does not improve symptoms of most women with AD. These findings do not address possible long-term effects of estrogen in AD, possible interactions between estrogen and other treatment modalities, or putative effects of estrogen in preventing or delaying onset of this disorder.

Abstract-Background: Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common tremor disorders in adults and is characterized by kinetic and postural tremor. To develop this practice parameter, the authors reviewed available evidence regarding initiation of pharmacologic and surgical therapies, duration of their effect, their relative benefits and risks, and the strength of evidence supporting their use. Methods: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and CINAHL was performed to identify clinical trials in patients with ET published between 1966 and August 2004. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based on the level of evidence. Results and Conclusions: Propranolol and primidone reduce limb tremor (Level A). Alprazolam, atenolol, gabapentin (monotherapy), sotalol, and topiramate are probably effective in reducing limb tremor (Level B). Limited studies suggest that propranolol reduces head tremor (Level B). Clonazepam, clozapine, nadolol, and nimodipine possibly reduce limb tremor (Level C). Botulinum toxin A may reduce hand tremor but is associated with dose-dependent hand weakness (Level C). Botulinum toxin A may reduce head tremor (Level C) and voice tremor (Level C), but breathiness, hoarseness, and swallowing difficulties may occur in the treatment of voice tremor. Chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) (Level C) and thalamotomy (Level C) are highly efficacious in reducing tremor. Each procedure carries a small risk of major complications. Some adverse events from DBS may resolve with time or with adjustment of stimulator settings. There is insufficient evidence regarding the surgical treatment of head and voice tremor and the use of gamma knife thalamotomy (Level U). Additional prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed to better determine the efficacy and side effects of pharmacologic and surgical treatments of ET.

Background: This evidence-based guideline is an update of the

Essential tremor (ET) is a syndrome of tremor in posture and movement, but recent studies have revealed additional cerebellar motor disturbances, cognitive disturbances, personality changes, hearing loss, and olfactory deficits. Even dementia and shortened life expectancy were found in one cohort. Recent postmortem studies have found limited Lewy body pathology in some patients and Purkinje cell loss with torpedoes and Bergmann gliosis in others. These findings have led to the hypothesis that ET is a syndrome produced by at least two neurodegenerative diseases with more widespread clinical consequences than previously appreciated. We review the evidence for and against this hypothesis and conclude that studies purporting to support this hypothesis have failed to control for age-associated comorbidities, depression, medications, and other confounding factors. We propose the alternative hypothesis that abnormal neuronal oscillation is the fundamental abnormality in ET, and the well-documented cerebellar signs and symptoms, the controversial non-motor signs, and even the cerebellar pathology of ET could be caused by this oscillation. A major problem for many studies is the lack of a diagnostic gold standard. Lacking such a standard, we propose a subclassification of ET into three categories: hereditary ET, sporadic ET, and senile ET, which we believe will help researchers resolve many of the controversies in this field.

Physiologic and pathologic tremors are mechanistically classified into two broad groups: (1) those produced by oscillation in sensorimotor loops, so-called mechanical-reflex tremors, and (2) those produced by the oscillatory properties of central neuronal networks. This review provides a contemporary perspective of tremor pathophysiology while acknowledging that no form of tremor is understood completely. Indeed, the origin of oscillation in most forms of tremor is undefined, and in many instances the underlying pathology is unknown.

Tremor of the extended third digit and bipolar surface and needle electromyograms of the extensor digitorum were recorded from six healthy volunteers for the purpose of elucidating the motor-unit activity responsible for the 8- to 12-Hz component of physiological finger tremor. Tremor was measured with a force transducer during steady voluntary contractions of approximately 200-250 g. The surface EMGs were full-wave rectified and low-pass filtered (-3 dB at 21 Hz), producing the envelope of the surface EMG (the demodulated EMG). Spectral analyses of simultaneous tremor and demodulated EMG records were performed. In four of six subjects, a pronounced 8- to 12-Hz amplitude modulation in the surface EMG was present, and coherency analysis demonstrated that this modulation was strongly correlated with the well-known 8- to 12-Hz tremor. In two subjects this amplitude modulation and tremor were barely detectable, despite the sensitive recording and analysis techniques used in this study. Spectral analysis was performed on 43 motor-unit spike trains. Twenty-two spike trains, having mean firing frequencies in the range of 10-22 spikes/s, produced statistically significant spectral peaks at 8-12 Hz, in addition to the expected spectral peaks at the mean firing frequencies. Of the 22 8- to 12-Hz-producing motor units, 12 had mean firing frequencies in the range of 17-22 spikes/s and exhibited the greatest 8- to 12-Hz activities of all motor units recorded. These motor units displayed transient sequences of double discharges in which interspike intervals (ISIS) of approximately 8-30 ms alternated with ISIS of 60-90 ms, thus producing an 8- to 12-Hz spectral peak. Adjacent ISIS of these motor units were correlated in the range of -0.5 to -0.9. Coherency analyses demonstrated that the 8- to 12-Hz activities of these motor units were correlated with the 8- to 12-Hz finger tremor and surface EMG modulation. The remaining 10 8- to 12-Hz-producing motor units had mean firing frequencies in the range of 10-17 spike/s. Although these motor units did not display the intense double-discharge firing pattern of the more rapidly firing motor units, a tendency toward action potential grouping was present and resulted in 8- to 12-Hz spectral activities which were correlated with the tremor and surface EMG modulation. .. ..