No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background and purpose — There are few reports on the outcome of distal radius fractures after 1 year. Therefore we investigated the long-term patient-reported functional outcome and health-related quality of life after a distal radius fracture in adults. Patients and methods — We reviewed 823 patients, treated either nonoperatively or operatively in 2012. After a mean follow-up of 3.8 years 285 patients (35%) completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and EuroQol-5D. Results — The mean PRWE score was 11. The mean EQ-5D index value was 0.88 and the mean EQ VAS for self-rated health status was 80. Nonoperatively treated type A and type B fractures had lower PRWE scores compared with operatively treated patients, whereas the EQ-5D was similar between groups. The EQ VAS for patients aged 65 and older was statistically significantly lower than that of younger patients. Interpretation — Patients had a good overall long-term functional outcome after a distal radius fracture. Patients with fractures that were possible to treat nonoperatively had less pain and better wrist function after long-term follow-up than patients who needed surgical fixation.

We tested the hypothesis that the original surgeon-investigator classification of a fracture of the distal radius in a prospective cohort study would have moderate agreement with the final classification by the team performing final analysis of the data. The initial post-injury radiographs of 621 patients with distal radius fractures from a multicenter international prospective cohort study were classified according to the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures, first by the treating surgeon-investigator and then by a research team analyzing the data. Correspondence between original and revised classification was evaluated using the Kappa statistic at the type, group and subgroup levels. The agreement between initial and revised classifications decreased from Type (moderate; Κ(type) = 0.60), to Group (moderate; Κ(group) = 0.41), to Subgroup (fair; Κ(subgroup) = 0.33) classifications (all p < 0.05). There was only moderate agreement in the classification of fractures of the distal radius between surgeon-investigators and final evaluators in a prospective multicenter cohort study. Such variations might influence interpretation and comparability of the data. The lack of a reference standard for classification complicates efforts to lessen variability and improve consensus.

IV.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology, treatment and costs of hand and wrist injuries presenting to the Dutch ED. With increasing medical costs and crowding of emergency departments (ED), a more detailed description of emergency department attendance of hand and wrist injuries and their treatment may help to facilitate more adequate allocation of health care services. Methods The Dutch Injury Surveillance System obtained a total of 160,250 hand and wrist injuries. Patient characteristics, incidence rates, type of injury, treatment, and costs were described. Results The incidence of hand and wrist injuries in the Netherlands in 2016 was 11 per 1000 in males and 8 per 1000 in females. This is about 25% of all injuries presented at the ED. Of all hand injuries, only 3% was directly admitted to the hospital or received emergency surgery. Thirty percent did not need further treatment in the hospital. Conclusion The current data suggest that a substantial proportion of the hand and wrist injuries needed no subsequent specialized treatment. Although the severity of the injury could not be deduced from our data, the data suggest a ground for a more extensive role of primary health care (general) practitioners in the primary triage and treatment of hand and wrist injuries. This may reduce health care cost and help decongest the ED departments. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary conclusions. Level of evidence III.