The most suitable method for estimation of size diversity is investigated. Size diversity is computed on the basis of the Shannon diversity expression adapted for continuous variables, such as size. It takes the form of an integral involving the probability density function (pdf) of the size of the individuals. Different approaches for the estimation of pdf are compared: parametric methods, assuming that data come from a determinate family of pdfs, and nonparametric methods, where pdf is estimated using some kind of local evaluation. Exponential, generalized Pareto, normal, and log-normal distributions have been used to generate simulated samples using estimated parameters from real samples. Nonparametric methods include discrete computation of data histograms based on size intervals and continuous kernel estimation of pdf. Kernel approach gives accurate estimation of size diversity, whilst parametric methods are only useful when the reference distribution have similar shape to the real one. Special attention is given for data standardization. The division of data by the sample geometric mean is proposed as the most suitable standardization method, which shows additional advantages: the same size diversity value is obtained when using original size or log-transformed data, and size measurements with different dimensionality (longitudes, areas, volumes or biomasses) may be immediately compared with the simple addition of ln k where k is the dimensionality (1, 2, or 3, respectively). Thus, the kernel estimation, after data standardization by division of sample geometric mean, arises as the most reliable and generalizable method of size diversity evaluation.
Differences between zooplankton structure (species abundance and size distribution) and dynamics of permanent and temporary basins of a Mediterranean salt marsh (Empordà Wetlands, NE Spain) were analysed by means of taxon-based and size-based approaches. These basins are shallow bodies of water which are occasionally connected. They were isolated after water retreat from a broadly flooded, lowlying area close to the open sea. Although temporary and permanent basins show no differences in the most abundant zooplankton species, they differ in their zooplankton diversity, temporal pattern and size structure. The zooplankton assemblages of temporary basins exhibit a temporal pattern with six phases, which are conditioned to the hydrological cycle, each one dominated by one species, whereas in the permanent basin this temporal pattern shows only two phases. Zooplankton size distribution of the temporary basins is dominated by large sizes (copepodites and copepods) while the permanent basin is dominated mainly by small sizes (rotifera and nauplii of copepods). In the temporary basins, the shape of the biomass size spectrum changes according to the hydrological cycle and reflects the dynamics of the ecological interactions among zooplankton species. Differences in the zooplankton composition and dynamics of the permanent basin are not a consequence of water permanence but of the ecological interactions among species involved. The presence of a stable fish population in the permanent waters may explain the high values of zooplankton diversity and the low densities of large zooplankton.
Body size has been widely recognised as a key factor determining community structure in ecosystems. We analysed size diversity patterns of phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish assemblages in 13 data sets from freshwater and marine sites with the aim to assess whether there is a general trend in the effect of predation and resource competition on body size distribution across a wide range of aquatic ecosystems. We used size diversity as a measure of the shape of size distribution. Size diversity was computed based on the Shannon-Wiener diversity expression, adapted to a continuous variable, i.e. as body size. Our results show that greater predation pressure was associated with reduced size diversity of prey at all trophic levels. In contrast, competition effects depended on the trophic level considered. At upper trophic levels (zooplankton and fish), size distributions were more diverse when potential resource availability was low, suggesting that competitive interactions for resources promote diversification of aquatic communities by size. This pattern was not found for phytoplankton size distributions where size diversity mostly increased with low zooplankton grazing and increasing nutrient availability. Relationships we found were weak, indicating that predation and competition are not the only determinants of size distribution. Our results suggest that predation pressure leads to accumulation of organisms in the less predated sizes, while resource competition tends to favour a wider size distributionhis work was supported by grants from the Comision de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnica (CICYT), Programa de Investigacion Fundamental (CGL2008-05778/BOS and CGL2011-23907). We thank Dr. Dietmar Straile, who provided zooplankton data on Lake Constance. S. Brucet's contribution was supported by the Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship No. 330249 (CLIMBING
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.