Abstract. In this paper, we present and analyze a novel global database of soil infiltration measurements, the Soil Water Infiltration Global (SWIG) database. In total, 5023 infiltration curves were collected across all continents in the SWIG database. These data were either provided and quality checked by the scientists who performed the experiments or they were digitized from published articles. Data from 54 different countries were included in the database with major contributions from Iran, China, and the USA. In addition to its extensive geographical coverage, the collected infiltration curves cover research from 1976 to late 2017. Basic information on measurement location and method, soil properties, and land use was gathered along with the infiltration data, making the database valuable for the development of pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for estimating soil hydraulic properties, for the evaluation of infiltration measurement methods, and for developing and validating infiltration models. Soil textural information (clay, silt, and sand content) is available for 3842 out of 5023 infiltration measurements (∼ 76%) covering nearly all soil USDA textural classes except for the sandy clay and silt classes. Information on land use is available for 76 % of the experimental sites with agricultural land use as the dominant type (∼ 40%). We are convinced that the SWIG database will allow for a better parameterization of the infiltration process in land surface models and for testing infiltration models. All collected data and related soil characteristics are provided online in *.xlsx and *.csv formats for reference, and we add a disclaimer that the database is for public domain use only and can be copied freely by referencing it. Supplementary data are available at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.885492 (Rahmati et al., 2018). Data quality assessment is strongly advised prior to any use of this database. Finally, we would like to encourage scientists to extend and update the SWIG database by uploading new data to it.
Abstract. In this paper, we present and analyze a global database of soil infiltration measurements, the Soil Water Infiltration Global (SWIG) database, for the first time. In total, 5023 infiltration curves were collected across all continents in the SWIG database. These data were either provided and quality checked by the scientists who performed the experiments or they were digitized from published articles. Data from 54 different countries were included in the database with major contributions from Iran, China, and USA. In addition to its global spatial coverage, the collected infiltration curves cover a time span of research from 1976 to late 2017. Basic information on measurement location and method, soil properties, and land use were gathered along with the infiltration data, which makes the database valuable for the development of pedo-transfer functions for estimating soil hydraulic properties, for the evaluation of infiltration measurement methods, and for developing and validating infiltration models. Soil textural information (clay, silt, and sand content) is available for 3842 out of 5023 infiltration measurements (~76 %) covering nearly all soil USDA textural classes except for the sandy clay and silt classes. Information on the land use is available for 76 % of experimental sites with agricultural land use as the dominant type (~40 %). We are convinced that the SWIG database will allow for a better parameterization of the infiltration process in land surface models and for testing infiltration models. All collected data and related soil characteristics are provided online in *.xlsx and *.csv formats for reference, and we add a disclaimer that the database is for use by public domain only and can be copied freely by referencing it. Supplementary data are available at doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.885492. Data quality assessment is strongly advised prior to any use of this database. Finally, we would like to encourage scientists to extend/update the SWIG by uploading new data to it.
Core Ideas The Green–Ampt theory may be now generalized for the unsaturated zone. This theory is applicable in any homogeneous soil for θi ≠ 0. The centenary limitation of the Green–Ampt theory for horizontal infiltration has been solved. In past work, an analytic solution of the Boltzmann transform as a function of matric potential was proposed to estimate the soil water content profile for horizontal water infiltration into porous media. However, it could only be successfully described for sands, but with singularity at position x = 0. Later, others introduced the concept of air‐entry pressure to divide the soil water retention curve into saturated and unsaturated domains to provide an exact solution of the Bruce and Klute equation, with no restrictions, while assuming the initial soil water content to be zero before the infiltration process. The problem remained that the above‐mentioned analytical solution was limited to sands, while the Bruce‐ and Klute‐based approach was limited to zero water content at the beginning. This study was based on both previous studies, and the objective was to develop a solution that works for all soil types and does not depend on zero initial soil moisture content. As a result, an alternative solution is presented that generalizes the centenary theory of Green and Ampt for any homogeneous soil.
Summary Field capacity (FC) is crucial for modelling soil–plant–water dynamics with bucket‐type models, supporting prevention of environmental problems (e.g. chemical leaching to deeper layers and groundwater and waste of water resources). As FC measurement in situ is labour intensive, approaches for its estimation have been proposed. However, because they differ conceptually and are based on different assumptions, the response to an application (e.g. crop yield (CY) modelling) can be rather different. This study evaluated frequently used FC approaches in scenarios quantifying differences in behaviour of soil water and air retention, evapotranspiration (ET) and CY. Also, a soil texture‐based pedotransfer function (PTF) was compared with other methods. Six sites with different soil types and management practices from tropical and temperate climates were investigated. Field capacity was estimated based on a static criterion using the water content (θ) at pressure heads (h) of 0.6, 1 and 3.3 m and at the inflection point (θi) of all water retention curves (SWRCs) and the Assouline and Or model (AO). Moreover, four equations found in the literature based on a dynamic criterion were also evaluated. For all soils, the largest FC results were obtained when θi was set as FC. The smallest FC values were obtained with θ (3.3 m) (tropical) and AO (temperate). The coefficient of variation (CV) between FC estimates, based on nine approaches, ranged from 7 to 54%. Available water storage, air capacity (AC) and ET results were sensitive to FC and showed more variation for the Brazilian sites. The PTF used estimated FC within the range of results obtained by the other nine approaches. In addition, AquaCrop was used to study the effect of FC on CY by fixing all model parameters, whereas FC was the only flexible parameter. Crop yield was sensitive to the variation in FC under low and medium rainfall, but increased with larger FC. For high rainfall, the yield was small in a scenario with large θfc because AC became yield limiting. Highlights Different approaches can be used to estimate field capacity The criteria static and dynamic and a texture-based PTF were evaluated Sensitivity analyses were performed with parameters of bucket type model and crop yield simulations Results showed that management decisions differed according to field capacity criteria
Core Ideas Five indices and two hydraulic energy cumulative functions are examined to evaluate SPQ. With these indices and functions, it is possible to assess soil structure through spatial and temporal effects. The volumetric water content at field capacity was calculated based on a flux drainage criterion. The script for SWRC fitting parameters and all presented indices is provided. Qualitative analyses of physical, chemical, or biological variables are difficult and often ambiguous. Soil physical quality (SPQ) indices are not an exception to this rule. There is no unique revealing parameter or index that enables evaluating soil structure. In high‐intensity biomass production systems, SPQ indices are useful tools for management decisions because they indicate the sustainability of soil organic matter dynamics, drainage, infiltration, heat transfer, and storage processes. This work examines five energy parameters and two hydraulic energy functions for evaluating physical quality in terrestrial vegetative ecosystems. These indices are based on numerical integration of the soil water retention curve (SWRC) and on soil water content at field capacity, and they manifest the absolute aeration energy, the absolute water retention energy, the relative aeration energy, the relative water retention energy, and the relative air‐water energy. This integration technique includes the use of all points of the SWRC. A script for fitting the parameters of the van Genuchten equation and for solving all the presented indices in this work was developed and made available. The energy indices and hydraulic functions were derived and validated for SWRCs, from several German, US, and Brazilian soils under different management, comparing them with other previously published SPQ indices. Our findings reveal that the energy indices and functions can be applied to assess the energy associated with the soil physical structure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.