Vestibular function testing confirms a greater incidence of peripheral vestibular hypofunction in dizzy service members with blast-related TBI relative to those who are asymptomatic. Additionally, oculomotor abnormalities and/or nystagmus consistent with central involvement were present in 10 of the 24 study participants tested. The precise cause of these findings remains unknown.

The incidence of vestibular and audiologic injury related to blast injury remains underreported. The primary objective of this study was to document self-reported otovestibular impairment in blast-injured amputees. Secondary objectives include a description of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center Blast Injury Questionnaire and other aspects of the audiology service and amputee physical therapy section standards of care for blast injury management. A case study illustrates the application of these standards of care. Thirty-three patients were evaluated by audiologists and physical therapists using the Walter Reed Army Medical Center Blast Injury Questionnaire, followed by audiologic and vestibular screening; 24% of patients reported symptoms of vertigo or oscillopsia following blast trauma, and 51% reported subjective hearing loss. The case study subject reported an increase in function after vestibular rehabilitation therapy. Thorough screening by audiologists and physical therapists can facilitate appropriate diagnosis and management for blast-injured patients.

Background:The study evaluates a group of Military Service Members specialized in blast explosive training called “Breachers” who are routinely exposed to multiple low-level blasts while teaching breaching at the U.S. Marine Corps in Quantico Virginia. The objective of this study was to determine if there are any acute or long-term auditory changes due to repeated low-level blast exposures used in training. The performance of the instructor group “Breachers” was compared to a control group, “Engineers”.Methods:A total of 11 Breachers and four engineers were evaluated in the study. The participants received comprehensive auditory tests, including pure-tone testing, speech-in-noise (SIN) measures, and central auditory behavioral and objective tests using early and late (P300) auditory evoked potentials over a period of 17 months. They also received shorter assessments immediately following the blast-exposure onsite at Quantico.Results:No acute or longitudinal effects were identified. However, there were some interesting baseline effects found in both groups. Contrary to the expected, the onsite hearing thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions were slightly better at a few frequencies immediately after blast-exposure than measurements obtained with the same equipment weeks to months after each blast-exposure.Conclusions:To date, the current study is the most comprehensive study that evaluates the long-term effects of blast-exposure on hearing. Despite extensive testing to assess changes, the findings of this study suggest that the levels of current exposures used in this military training environment do not seem to have an obvious deleterious effect on hearing.

The objective of this study was to use a prospective cohort of United States Marine Corps (USMC) instructors to identify any acute or long-term vestibular dysfunction following repeated blast exposures during explosive breaching training. They were assessed in clinic and on location during training at the USMC Methods of Entry School, Quantico, VA. Subjects received comprehensive baseline vestibular assessments and these were repeated in order to identify longitudinal changes. They also received shorter assessments immediately following blast exposure in order to identify acute findings. The main outcome measures were the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, vestibular Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of subjective vestibular function, videonystagmography (VNG), vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP), rotary chair (including the unilateral centrifugation test), computerized dynamic posturography, and computerized dynamic visual acuity. A total of 11 breachers and 4 engineers were followed for up to 17 months. No acute effects or longitudinal deteriorations were identified, but there were some interesting baseline group differences. Upbeat positional nystagmus was common, and correlated (p<0.005) with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Several instructors had abnormally short low-frequency phase leads on rotary chair testing. This study evaluated breaching instructors over a longer test period than any other study, and the results suggest that this population appears to be safe from a vestibular standpoint at the current exposure levels. Upbeat positional nystagmus correlated with a history of mTBI in this population, and this has not been described elsewhere. The data trends also suggest that this nystagmus could be an acute blast effect. However, the reasons for the abnormally short phase leads seen in rotary chair testing are unclear at this time. Further investigation seems warranted.

Objectives: The Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) test and the closely related Rod and Disk Test (RDT) are measures of perceived verticality measured in static and dynamic visual backgrounds. However, the equipment used for these tests is variable across clinics and is often too expensive or too primitive to be appropriate for widespread use. Commercial virtual reality technology, which is now widely available, may provide a more suitable alternative for collecting these measures in clinical populations. This study was designed to investigate verticality perception in symptomatic patients using a modified RDT paradigm administered through a head-mounted display (HMD). Design: A group of adult patients referred by a physician for vestibular testing based on the presence of dizziness symptoms and a group of healthy adults without dizziness symptoms were included. We investigated degree of visual dependence in both groups by measuring SVV as a function of kinematic changes to the visual background. Results: When a dynamic background was introduced into the HMD to simulate the RDT, significantly greater shifts in SVV were found for the patient population than for the control population. In patients referred for vestibular testing, the SVV measured with the HMD was significantly correlated with traditional measures of SVV collected in a rotary chair when accounting for head tilt. Conclusions: This study provides initial proof of concept evidence that reliable SVV measures in static and dynamic visual backgrounds can be obtained using a low-cost commercial HMD system. This initial evidence also suggests that this tool can distinguish individuals with dizziness symptomatology based on SVV performance in dynamic visual backgrounds.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide empirical data describing the relationship between behavioral responses to dynamic visual motion in adults with chronic dizziness symptoms with and without clinically identifiable peripheral vestibular impairment. Design: Prospective, quasi-experimental study including individuals with chronic dizziness symptoms with identified unilateral peripheral vestibular impairment (n=27), and individuals with chronic dizziness symptoms without identified vestibular impairment (n=26). We measured (a) visual perception of verticality in a dynamic background, (b) postural displacement in a dynamic background, (c) eye movement behaviors in various visual contexts, and (d) self-rating degree of anxiety. Results: Status of peripheral vestibular function was not a significant predictor of behavioral responses to visual motion. The data show that the ability to fixate on a visual target was predictive of postural control in a dynamic visual background. Trial-to-trial variability in verticality responses and degree of self-rated anxiety were also associated with postural control. Conclusions: Apart from vestibular function, oculomotor control is important for maintaining control of whole-body motor responses during exposure to a dynamic visual stimulus. Vertical perception precision—not accuracy—may be more important for understanding real-world consequences of visual motion sensitivity. Traditional diagnostic evaluations focusing exclusively on characterizing the peripheral vestibular system may not provide insight into the behaviors associated with visual motion sensitivity.

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to describe a new method for assessment of superior semicircular canal dehiscence by laying the patient supine during Valsalva-induced nystagmus testing. Method The traditional Valsalva-induced nystagmus test is described, followed by a new method for assessment of superior semicircular dehiscence conducted by laying the patient supine during testing. A case study is presented to illustrate this new testing technique known as the Supine Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Test. Results It is hypothesized that during Valsalva-induced nystagmus testing performed in the upright, seated position, the dura mater could potentially seal the superior semicircular canal fistula, thereby concealing a defect in the bony labyrinth and yielding a false-negative test. To circumvent this, the patient should be placed in the supine position during Valsalva-induced nystagmus testing in order to prevent the dura mater from inadvertently sealing itself against the petrous portion of the temporal bone. The Supine Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Test may reveal the defect in the bony labyrinth and improve the sensitivity of the Valsalva-induced nystagmus test. Conclusions The Supine Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Test may be more sensitive for identifying superior semicircular canal dehiscence in patients with traditional symptoms and a negative Valsalva-induced nystagmus test in the seated position. While a case study is presented to illustrate the potential benefits of including the Supine Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Test in the battery of diagnostic tests, further research is needed in larger samples.

Background A clinical pattern of damage to the auditory, visual, and vestibular sensorimotor systems, known as multi-sensory impairment, affects roughly 2% of the US population each year. Within the population of US military service members exposed to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), 15–44% will develop multi-sensory impairment following a mild traumatic brain injury. In the US civilian population, multi-sensory impairment-related symptoms are also a common sequela of damage to the vestibular system and affect ~ 300–500/100,000 population. Vestibular rehabilitation is recognized as a critical component of the management of multi-sensory impairment. Unfortunately, the current clinical practice guidelines for the delivery of vestibular rehabilitation are not evidence-based and primarily rely on expert opinion. The focus of this trial is gaze stability training, which represents the unique component of vestibular rehabilitation. The aim of the Incremental Velocity Error as a New Treatment in Vestibular Rehabilitation (INVENT VPT) trial is to assess the efficacy of a non-invasive, incremental vestibular adaptation training device for normalizing the response of the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Methods The INVENT VPT Trial is a multi-center randomized controlled crossover trial in which military service members with mTBI and civilian patients with vestibular hypofunction are randomized to begin traditional vestibular rehabilitation or incremental vestibular adaptation and then cross over to the alternate intervention after a prescribed washout period. Vestibulo-ocular reflex function and other functional outcomes are measured to identify the best means to improve the delivery of vestibular rehabilitation. We incorporate ecologically valid outcome measures that address the common symptoms experienced in those with vestibular pathology and multi-sensory impairment. Discussion The INVENT VPT Trial will directly impact the health care delivery of vestibular rehabilitation in patients suffering from multi-sensory impairment in three critical ways: (1) compare optimized traditional methods of vestibular rehabilitation to a novel device that is hypothesized to improve vestibulo-ocular reflex performance, (2) isolate the ideal dosing of vestibular rehabilitation considering patient burden and compliance rates, and (3) examine whether recovery of the vestibulo-ocular reflex can be predicted in participants with vestibular symptoms. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03846830. Registered on 20 February 2019.