In 1983 the Fourth Australian Family Therapy Conference had the theme ‘Merging the Streams — Integrating Trends in Family Therapy’. In his keynote address Brian Stagoll outlined concerns regarding the nature of family therapy as it was then developing in Australia. This article revisits some of these themes to see where we have come from, where we are heading and which topics continue to be ignored. Evidence is drawn from articles that stood out for me in the Australian Journal of Family Therapy (later the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy) and selected relevant papers from the 1983 conference itself. Finally, I speculate upon possible reasons for the absence of discussion on certain issues, most strikingly: systemic influences upon indigenous Australians, farm families, working with children in families, certain aspects of gender, the systemic implications of addiction; and environmental impacts on families now and for the future. The danger for family therapy is becoming stuck in a closed system that ignores the wider system.
The Bronte family produced three major authors of the Victorian period, only one of whom, Charlotte, lived to enjoy her fame. Since the beginning, this family has elicited controversy, myth and speculation. The authors attempt an analysis of the complex dynamics of the Brontes, including its constituent 'family cultures: parent-child alliances, sibling bonds and rivalries, the traumatic effects of three early deaths, and the strong theme of secrecy and 'protection' in a family dominated by Branwell Bronte's instability and eventual alcoholism. The authors speculate on how this family might have presented for treatment, and invite readers to consider how they, as family therapists, might have responded.The three Bronte sisters -Charlotte, Emily and Anne -emerged suddenly in 1847 as outstanding writers, and subsequently their collective work has become a cornerstone of nineteenth century English literature. Yet only Charlotte lived to enjoy her own success: her younger sisters died before they could fulfil their potential. Their brother Branwell, younger than Charlotte but older than Emily and Anne, was as talented and ambitious as they, but published only a handful of poems, and also met an early death with his literary ambitions virtually abandoned. The father of all four, the Rev. Patrick Bronte, had had an ambition to write, and had published verse, and several didactic children's stories, but apart from frequent letters to the press on political and religious questions, had largely given up his literary efforts by the time his children were born.There is voluminous evidence for some aspects of the Brontes' lives and interactions, but very little for others, a situation which has given rise to much controversy and myth-making. Elizabeth Gaskell's early biography The Life of Charlotte Bronte was written by a contemporary and friend of Charlotte's, and its selective and biased account has coloured many later ones. Gaskell is largely responsible for the longstanding myth that the Bronte children grew up in almost total seclusion in a lonely, windswept house on the outskirts of a primitive, uncultured village, with only each other for company, and little opportunity to encounter people or ideas from outside the family. As Juliet Barker's recent, painstaking research has shown, this was simply not true. Haworth was a thriving, newly industrialised centre, with a flourishing political and cultural life, in which several of the Brontes participated; they had regular social contact with a number of local families, and, later, with others further Aeld (such as Charlotte's friends from boarding school). Gaskell is also largely responsible for the 'demonising' of Branwell, and for the implication that Patrick was a remote, frightening patriarch.The tendency to read the Bronte's novels, particularly
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.