After R0 resection for gastric cancer, the N ratio is a potent prognostic factor. It should therefore be considered in the clinical decision making process.

No abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. These tumors span a wide clinical spectrum from benign to malignant and have long been recognized for their nearly absolute resistance to chemotherapy and radiation treatment. We reviewed the worldwide experience on GIST diagnosis, prognosis and treatment and describe our own series. PubMed was searched for references using the terms gastrointestinal stromal tumor, GIST and gastrointestinal sarcoma. Recent reports were given emphasis because GIST is a novel clinical entity and older published work on gastrointestinal sarcomas might be contaminated with other histologic tumor types. At present, surgery is the standard treatment for primary resectable GIST. To increase the activity of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, locoregional therapies are being implemented in the clinical setting. A major breakthrough is the development of a new class of anticancer agents targeting tumor-specific molecular abnormalities. Preliminary results on administration of imatinib mesylate, a signal transduction inhibitor, are particularly encouraging, showing potent activity of this drug against metastatic GIST. Molecular targeting of the critical pathogenetic mechanism underlying GIST might not only revolutionize the strategy to treat locally advanced and metastatic GIST but also improve disease control after macroscopically radical surgery.

No abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an effective tool for axillary staging in patients with invasive breast cancer. This procedure has been recently proposed as part of the treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), because cases of undetected invasive foci and nodal metastases occasionally occur. However, the indications for SLN biopsy in DCIS patients are controversial.

BACKGROUND After breast conservation therapy (BCT), margin status is routinely evaluated to select patients who need reexcision. The aim of this study was to investigate how margin status and other clinicopathologic factors correlate with the presence of residual tumor at reexcision. METHODS A series of 431 breast cancer patients who underwent BCT followed by reexcision were considered because they had positive or close (≤3 mm) margins. At univariate and multivariate analysis the frequency of residual tumor in the reexcision specimens was associated with the status and width of resection margins and with a series of other clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS Of the 382 evaluable patients, 253 had positive and 129 close margins. Residual tumor was found at reexcision in 51.8% positive‐margin patients and 34.1% close‐margin patients (P = .001). In the latter group tumor‐margin distance (range, 0.08 to 3 mm) was not associated with the incidence of residual tumor (P = .134). On univariate analysis age ≤45 years (P = .006), intraductal histotype (P = .005), size > 2 cm (P = .010), positive axillary nodes (P = .031), and timing of reexcision (P = .044) were significantly associated with a higher frequency of residual tumor. All these factors, except tumor size, maintained a significant predictive value on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS In the presence of positive margins, relevant residual disease cannot be ruled out and further surgery is indicated. Close margins do not mandate reexcision because they may indicate either that the tumor has been radically excised or the presence of residual foci of a multifocal tumor, which are usually effectively treated by radiotherapy. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Subclassification of T2 tumours should be undertaken routinely in order to stratify patients with gastric cancer more accurately in terms of their mortality risk.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), tumors characterized by c-KIT mutations, are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. The stomach is the most commonly involved site. Localization, size and mitotic rate are reliable predictors of survival and the two milestones of GISTs treatment are surgery and imatinib. This article is aimed to report the data of an audit, carried out on the morphological and clinical aspects of the disease and to review the present knowledge on GISTs. A total of 172 patients with GISTs (M : F=1 : 1; mean age 65 years) were recruited. The stomach was the most frequently involved site. In 50% of the cases the tumor was smaller than 5 cm, whereas major symptoms were observed in 43% of the cases. Predictors of progressive disease were present only in a small percentage of cases but the disease was in the metastatic phase in over 25% of the cases at diagnosis. Familial aggregation was rare but a consistent share of the patients (21%) had other synchronous or metachronous cancers. The most frequent mutations were in-frame deletions and point mutations of c-KIT exon 11. This report confirms in part the available data on GIST in a consecutive series of patients recruited in Italy and shows that only large collaborative multicenter studies provide data sound enough to enable making reasonable clinical and therapeutic choices, and suggests that, as a measure of secondary prevention, a diagnostic definition should be obtained in all submucosal lesions of the GI tract and that GIST patients should be screened for second tumors.