Recent advances in contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) mainly include (a) development of low-acoustic-pressure (low-mechanical-index) harmonic software, capable of obtaining real-time images without disrupting contrast material microbubbles, and (b) commercialization of new contrast media ("second-generation" contrast media), capable of producing intense echo signals in this low-mechanical-index setting. With use of low-mechanical-index continuous-mode contrast-enhanced US, the circulatory kinetic models of various focal liver lesions can be displayed dynamically. Hepatic lesions usually have typical perfusion characteristics and enhancement patterns through the various phases of parenchymal enhancement, which helps characterize lesions and, in most cases, allows definitive diagnosis, even among lesions that exhibit very similar baseline appearances. Because of the use of harmonic technologies at low emission frequencies, there is some loss of spatial resolution and overall image quality, typically resulting in a grainy appearance. In addition, lesion depth affects the detectability of vascularity to some degree in that poor signal arises from deep-seated lesions. Moreover, liver attenuation (eg, in patients with steatosis or chronic liver disease) further reduces the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced US. Nevertheless, with its unique capacity to provide images in real time, low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced US is the dynamic imaging modality of choice in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions.
Contrast-enhanced sonography is a promising tool in the assessment of splenic trauma. In institutions where sonography is used as the initial procedure, this technique may increase its effectiveness.
Contrast-enhanced sonography is an effective tool in the evaluation of blunt hepatic trauma, being more sensitive than baseline sonography and correlating better than baseline sonography with CT findings. In institutions where sonography is regarded as the initial procedure to screen patients with trauma, this technique may increase its effectiveness. In addition, CES may be valuable in the follow-up of patients with conservatively treated liver trauma.
We used contrast-specific sonography to assess eight patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Five of these cases were correlated with CT findings. We found that contrast-enhanced sonography can reveal features specific for ruptured aortic aneurysm without causing a significant delay in surgery. This technique may be as effective as CT but may allow a more rapid and noninvasive diagnosis, especially when sonography can be performed bedside.
The scope of this study was to determine whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), compared with basic US, can increase diagnostic confidence and provide relevant information on blunt scrotal trauma. Over a period of 75 months we examined 40 patients seen consecutively for blunt scrotal trauma using high-resolution US, color-power Doppler, low mechanical index CEUS, and power Doppler after IV administration of contrast medium (SonoVue Ò ). In the 24 cases that were positive, concordance between basal US and CEUS findings was grade 0 (absent) in 4 cases, grade 1 (low) in 3, grade 2 (moderate) in 8, and grade 3 (high) in 9. The relevance of the additional information provided by CEUS was classified as follows: high in 4/40 (10%), moderate 7/40 (17,5%), low 13/40 (32,5%), none in 14/40 (35%). Our findings demonstrate that CEUS is appreciably more sensitive in detecting damage caused by blunt scrotal trauma, particularly small lesions. It is also useful for differential diagnosis and marginalization of corpuscular fluid collections, fractures, and above all ruptures, which require immediate surgery. In our series 2 out of 3 (67%) patients with testicular rupture were diagnosed only by CEUS. We feel that the use of CEUS can significantly improve diagnostic confidence in cases of closed scrotal trauma although these conclusions need to be confirmed in larger case series.Sommario Scopo del nostro lavoro è stato di valutare l'eventuale maggiore confidenza diagnostica e contenuto informativo dell'ecografia con mezzo di contrasto e.v. (CEUS) nel trauma scrotale chiuso rispetto all'indagine ecografica (US) di base. Nell'arco di 75 mesi abbiamo esaminato 40 pazienti consecutivi con trauma scrotale chiuso, utilizzando US ad alta risoluzione, color-power-Doppler basale, ecocontrastografia a basso indice meccanico, power Doppler dopo mdc e.v. Il mdc usato è stato il SonoVue Ò . Nei 24 casi positivi, la concordanza tra US basale e CEUS è stata di grado 0 (assente) in 4 casi, di grado 1 (bassa) in 3, di grado 2 (medio) in 8, di grado 3 (elevato) in 9. La rilevanza del contenuto informativo aggiuntivo della * Award for the best oral presentation at the XXII SIUMB National Congress.* Corresponding author. Radiology Department, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy. E-mail address: robertolobianco@virgilio.it (R. Lobianco).Available online at www.sciencedirect.com CEUS veniva ritenuta: elevata in 4/40 (10%), media 7/40 (17,5%), bassa 13/40 (32,5%), assente in 14/40 (35%). I nostri risultati mostrano che la CEUS migliora sensibilmente la detezione dei segni di trauma rispetto l'US basale, specialmente nelle piccole lesioni. Essa è inoltre importante nella diagnosi differenziale e marginalizzazione delle raccolte fluide corpuscolate, nelle fratture e, di grande evidenza, nelle rotture, che impongono l'immediato intervento chirurgico: nella nostra casistica 2 casi su 3 di rotture (67%) si sono resi evidenti soltanto alla CEUS. Riteniamo che l'uso della CEUS possa aumentare significativamente la co...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.