In order to reduce the burden on healthcare systems and to support differential diagnosis with COVID-19, influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were strongly recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in vulnerable groups. However, no univocal and conclusive evidence on the relationship between influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations and COVID‐19 outcomes exists. We evaluated the association between such vaccinations, COVID-19 hospitalization, intensive care unit admissions and deaths in a cohort (N = 741) of COVID-19 patients who had access to the emergency room of a large Italian University hospital between March 1, 2020 and June 1, 2020. Results show that influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations did not affect hospitalization, intensive care unit admission and deaths in COVID-19 patients in the overall sample and in those ≥ 65 years. The same pattern of results was confirmed considering timing of influenza vaccine administration, vaccination type, and number of uptakes in the last five vaccination campaigns. In conclusion, our study does not support an impact of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations on COVID-19 outcomes.
BackgroundVaccine administration is an effective tool to prevent infectious diseases. Patients with autoimmune diseases have a higher risk of infections -mainly at respiratory level- as a consequence of immune system dysregulation as well as of immunosuppressive treatment. Therefore, prevention by specific available vaccinations is crucial, as suggested by different studies and by EULAR and ACR recommendations. To date, literature data support the effectiveness of vaccinations with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA); on the contrary, the 13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine has not yet been studied in RA patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity of the 13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine in patients with RA receiving Methotrexate (MTX)+TNF blockers, MTX alone or TNF blockers monotherapy compared to healthy controls (HC). The secondary objective was to determine vaccine safety.MethodsConsecutive RA patients with low-moderate disease activity treated with stable dose of glucocorticoids, MTX and/or anti-TNF drugs were enrolled. The pneumococcal vaccine was administered intramuscularly at baseline visit; patients underwent clinical and laboratory evaluation at the time of vaccination (T0) and after 1 (T1) and 6 (T2) months. Blood samples for the evaluation of specific anti-pneumococcal antibodies were collected at the same time-points. The immunogenicity was evaluated with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation; t-test was used to evaluate the difference in serum levels of antibodies to pneumococcal antigens at 1 and 6 months compared to baseline values. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results38 patients [36F/2M, age 62.1±11 yrs] and 6 healthy controls [2F/4M age 63.7±2 yrs] and 6 healthy controls [2F/4M age 63.7±2 yrs were enrolled; 11 patients were treated with MTX alone, 12 with TNF blocking monotherapy (Etanercept n=7, Adalimumab n=3 and Certolizumab n=2) and 15 with MTX in combination with TNF blockers (Infliximab n=1, Etanercept n=6, Adalimumab n=6 and Golimumab n=2). Actually, 24 patients and 3 HC have completed 6 months of follow-up. More than half of patients (61%) developed a positive antibody response to the thirteen polysaccharides (twofold increase of antibody titer). The most immunogenic pneumococcal antigens were polysaccharides 1, 4 and 9V (Image 1). At 1 month a threefold increase in antibody titre with a protective level maintained throughout 6 months was observed. After 1 and 6 months of treatment, no significant change in DAS28 was observed in vaccinated patients. During the follow-up we did not observe any severe adverse reactions in RA patients nor in healthy controls. Mild systemic and local adverse events (redness and/or swelling of injection site) were reported by 44% of vaccinated RA patients and by 16% of healthy subjects.ConclusionsThis is the first preliminary study to demonstrate safet...
Background: Improving immunisation rates in risk groups is one of the main objectives in vaccination strategies. However, achieving high vaccination rates in children with chronic conditions is difficult. Different types of vaccine providers may differently attract high risk children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.