Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for small, unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.
One hundred patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer underwent 'radical' liver resection from 1980 to 1989. At least 1 cm of normal parenchyma surrounded the tumour and no microscopic invasion of resection margins was evident. The disease was staged according to our own staging system. Lobectomy was performed in 50 patients and non-anatomical resection in the remainder. The postoperative mortality rate was 5 per cent and the major morbidity rate was 11 per cent. The actuarial 5-year survival rate for patients in stages I, II and III was 42 per cent, 34 per cent and 15 per cent respectively (P less than 0.001). The overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 30 per cent. The prognostic importance of various patient and tumour variables was evaluated by univariate analysis and then by multivariate analysis. Age of patient, site of primary, disease-free interval between treatment of primary and of hepatic metastases, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and number of metastases, did not relate to prognosis, while sex (P = 0.024), stage of primary (P = 0.026), extent of liver involvement (P less than 0.001), distribution of metastases (P = 0.01) and type of surgery (P = 0.028) significantly affected prognosis as single factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the extent of liver involvement and stage of the primary tumour were independent predictors of survival. We conclude that liver resection is effective in selected patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. In resectable patients it is not yet possible to formulate a clear prognosis based on clinical factors. The extent of liver involvement and the staging system used may be significant, although not absolute, indicators of outcome.
Purpose: The outcome of patients with colorectal cancer is more favorable when the tumor exhibits high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI). Although associated with earlier-stage tumors, MSI has been proposed as an independent predictor of survival.We tested the prognostic value of MSI in a large series of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in the last decade. Experimental Design: The survival of 893 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer characterized by microsatellite status was analyzed. The 89 (10%) patients with MSI cancer were classified according to tumor mismatch repair (MMR) defect, MMR germ-line mutation, hMLH1 and p16 promoter methylation, BRAF and K-ras mutations, and frameshifts of target genes. Results: The colorectal cancer^specific survival was significantly (P = 0.02) better in patients with MSI cancer than in those with stable tumor (MSS). MSI did not predict a significantly lower risk of cancer-related death if tumor stage was included in the multivariate analysis [hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.40-1.29; P = 0.27]. Instead, MSI was strongly associated with a decreased likelihood of lymph node (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.56; P < 0.001) and distant organ (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33; P < 0.001) metastases at diagnosis, independently of tumor pathologic features. Molecular predictors of reduced metastatic risk, and then of more favorable prognosis, included TGFbRII mutation for all MSI tumors, hMSH2 deficiency for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, and absence of p16 methylation for sporadic hMLH1-deficient cancers. Conclusions: Tumor MSI is a stage-dependent predictor of survival in patients with colorectal cancer. The decreased likelihood of metastases in patients with MSI cancer is associated with specific genetic and epigenetic changes of the primary tumor.
This paper represents the largest series ever published on DF and shows that its features have changed in the last 20 years. DF alone no longer leads to death and some complications observed in the past have disappeared, while new ones are emerging. Nowadays, medical therapy is preferred and surgery is indicated only in cases of abdominal sepsis or bleeding.
This study determines the infiltration rate of proximal and distal margins of resection in patients operated on for gastric cancer at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. Two hundred and eighty-five proximal margins and 286 distal margins were reviewed, and the incidence of infiltration was related to the length of grossly tumor-free edge, the location, site, size and gross appearance of the tumor, degree of invasion of the gastric wall, histologic type, and status of perigastric lymph nodes. Infiltration occurred in 7.3% of oral margins of transection and in 2.6% of aboral margins. Except for the degree of invasion of the gastric wall, no correlation was found among the infiltration rate and the above parameters. In fact, the incidence of infiltration of the proximal edge was significantly higher (6.4+ vs. 0.8%, p less than 0.01) when the tumor penetrated the serosa or spread beyond it than when the lesion was confined to the mucosa, submucosa, or muscular layer. With reference to the length of margin of resection, it is noteworthy that no involvement was found when cranial distance between the lesion and line of transection was equal to or greater than 6 cm. Proximal or distal infiltration for a distance greater than 3 cm did not occur in patients with lesions confined to the mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis. This data should provide the surgeon with a rational basis for assessing the extent of resection when performing gastrectomy for cancer.
A review was carried out of morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer in 208 consecutive patients who underwent this procedure between 1980 and 1992. Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 35 and 2.4 per cent respectively. The major morbidity rate was 18 per cent, the main complications being intra-abdominal sepsis, biliary fistula and haemorrhage. Of the different factors examined, morbidity was significantly related to the extent of liver resection (53 versus 21 per cent after major and minor resections respectively), amount of blood transfused (18 versus 52 per cent for no transfusion and more than 300 ml transfused respectively) and the date of the operation (53 versus 24 per cent before and after 1986 respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that only the extent of hepatic resection and the period at which surgery was performed retained their statistical significance. These data support the opinion that surgical treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer is an effective procedure with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates. An extensive experience of hepatic surgery is, however, necessary to optimize results.
Six cases of primary hepatic carcinoid tumors were studied with combined immunocytochemical and electron microscopic techniques. Positive tumor immunostaining with PHE5, LK2H10, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), serotonin, gastrin, and insulin antibodies was observed. At the ultrastructural level, cytoplasmic dense granules were seen in all the cases tested. This finding supports a putative origin of these carcinoids found in the liver from a pluripotential stem cell. The clinical course and follow-up of these cases suggests that this unusual hepatic neoplasm has a more favorable prognosis than other forms of hepatic cancer.
This regimen is well tolerated; its toxicity does not exceed that observed with the combination of 5-FU and mitomycin (MMC). Compared with our previous experience based on the classic CRT (5-FU, MMC, and radiation), the objective response rate observed with this new combination was similar. However, the local recurrence rate, observed in patients treated with the new regimen, was lower (6% v 24%). According to more recent data from the literature, primary CRT is the elective indication in epidermoid cancer of the anus and replacement of MMC with CDDP seems an effective and logical evolution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.