Background Several small studies on patients with COVID-19 and haematological malignancies are available showing a high mortality in this population. The Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 aimed to collect data from adult patients with haematological malignancies who required hospitalisation for COVID-19. Methods This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with diagnosis of a WHO-defined haematological malignancy admitted to 66 Italian hospitals between Feb 25 and May 18, 2020, with laboratory-confirmed and symptomatic COVID-19. Data cutoff for this analysis was June 22, 2020. The primary outcome was mortality and evaluation of potential predictive parameters of mortality. We calculated standardised mortality ratios between observed death in the study cohort and expected death by applying stratum-specific mortality rates of the Italian population with COVID-19 and an Italian cohort of 31 993 patients with haematological malignancies without COVID-19 (data up to March 1, 2019). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352556, and the prospective part of the study is ongoing. Findings We enrolled 536 patients with a median follow-up of 20 days (IQR 10-34) at data cutoff, 85 (16%) of whom were managed as outpatients. 440 (98%) of 451 hospitalised patients completed their hospital course (were either discharged alive or died). 198 (37%) of 536 patients died. When compared with the general Italian population with COVID-19, the standardised mortality ratio was 2•04 (95% CI 1•77-2•34) in our whole study cohort and 3•72 (2•86-4•64) in individuals younger than 70 years. When compared with the non-COVID-19 cohort with haematological malignancies, the standardised mortality ratio was 41•3 (38•1-44•9). Older age (hazard ratio 1•03, 95% CI 1•01-1•05); progressive disease status (2•10, 1•41-3•12); diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia (3•49, 1•56-7•81), indolent non-Hodgin lymphoma (2•19, 1•07-4•48), aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (2•56, 1•34-4•89), or plasma cell neoplasms (2•48, 1•31-4•69), and severe or critical COVID-19 (4•08, 2•73-6•09) were associated with worse overall survival. Interpretation This study adds to the evidence that patients with haematological malignancies have worse outcomes than both the general population with COVID-19 and patients with haematological malignancies without COVID-19. The high mortality among patients with haematological malignancies hospitalised with COVID-19 highlights the need for aggressive infection prevention strategies, at least until effective vaccination or treatment strategies are available. Funding Associazione italiana contro le leucemie, linfomi e mieloma-Varese Onlus.

Distinct forms of tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), juxtamembrane domain, exon 8, and internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations of c-KIT, were observed in about 46% of core binding factor leukemia (CBFL) patients. To evaluate their prognostic significance, 67 adult patients with CBFL were analyzed to ascertain the c-KIT mutation status. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21), the presence of c-KIT TKD mutation at codon 816 (TKD 816 ) was associated with a high white blood cell count at diagnosis (median, 29.60 ؋ 10 9 /L) and a higher incidence (33%) of extramedullary leukemia (EML) during the course of the disease. Data also showed that the TKD 816 mutated patients (n ‫؍‬ 12) had a significantly higher incidence of relapse and a lower overall survival (OS) at 24 months, compared with the 17 c-KIT unmutated (c-KIT ؊ ) patients (90% vs 35.3%, P ‫؍‬ .002; 25% vs 76.5%, P ‫؍‬ .006, respectively). No difference in relapse incidence (P ‫؍‬ .126) and OS (P ‫؍‬ .474) was observed between the c-KIT mutated other than TKD 816 (n ‫؍‬ 7) and the c-KIT ؊ patients. These findings indicate that c-KIT TKD 816 mutation has a negative impact on the outcome of AML with

Purpose The initial results of the APL0406 trial showed that the combination of all- trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is at least not inferior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in first-line therapy of low- or intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). We herein report the final analysis on the complete series of patients enrolled onto this trial. Patients and Methods The APL0406 study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III noninferiority trial. Eligible patients were adults between 18 and 71 years of age with newly diagnosed, low- or intermediate-risk APL (WBC at diagnosis ≤ 10 × 10/L). Overall, 276 patients were randomly assigned to receive ATRA-ATO or ATRA-CHT between October 2007 and January 2013. Results Of 263 patients evaluable for response to induction, 127 (100%) of 127 patients and 132 (97%) of 136 patients achieved complete remission (CR) in the ATRA-ATO and ATRA-CHT arms, respectively ( P = .12). After a median follow-up of 40.6 months, the event-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival at 50 months for patients in the ATRA-ATO versus ATRA-CHT arms were 97.3% v 80%, 1.9% v 13.9%, and 99.2% v 92.6%, respectively ( P < .001, P = .0013, and P = .0073, respectively). Postinduction events included two relapses and one death in CR in the ATRA-ATO arm and two instances of molecular resistance after third consolidation, 15 relapses, and five deaths in CR in the ATRA-CHT arm. Two patients in the ATRA-CHT arm developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. Conclusion These results show that the advantages of ATRA-ATO over ATRA-CHT increase over time and that there is significantly greater and more sustained antileukemic efficacy of ATO-ATRA compared with ATRA-CHT in low- and intermediate-risk APL.

Key Points A risk-adapted, MRD-driven transplant strategy is a feasible approach for the treatment of younger adults with AML. Pretransplant MRD positivity should not contraindicate delivery of an allogeneic stem cell transplant.

The SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase PTPN6 (SHP-1, PTP1C, HCP) is a 68 kDa cytoplasmic protein primarily expressed in hematopoietic cell development, proliferation and receptor-mediated mitogenic signaling pathways. By means of direct dephosphorylation, it down-regulates a broad spectrum of growth-promoting receptors, including the Kit tyrosine kinase, activated to elicit a prominent cascade of intracellular events by stem cell factor binding. The pivotal contribution of PTPN6 in modulating myeloid cell signaling has been revealed by the finding that shp-1 mutation is responsible for the overexpansion and inappropriate activation of myelomonocytic populations in motheaten (me/me) and motheaten viable (me(v)/me(v)) mice. Association of PTPN6 with c-Kit and negative modulation of the myeloid leukocyte signal transduction pathways prompted us to examine the expression of the protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPN6 gene in CD34(+)/CD117(+) blasts from acute myeloid leukemia patients. We identified and cloned cDNAs representing novel PTPN6 mRNA species, derived from aberrant splicing within the N-SH2 domain leading to retention of intron 3. Sequence analysis of cDNA clones revealed multiple A-->G editing conversions. The editing of PTPN6 mRNA mainly occurred as an A-->G conversion of A(7866), which represents the putative branch site in IVS3 of PTPN6 mRNA. Evidence that editing of A(7866) abrogates splicing has been obtained in vitro by using an edited clone and its backward clone generated by site-directed mutagenesis. The level of the aberrant intron-retaining splice variant, evaluated by semi-quantitative RT-PCR, was lower in CD117(+)-AML bone marrow mononuclear cells at remission than at diagnosis, suggesting the involvement of post-transcriptional PTPN6 processing in leukemogenesis.

Background Patients with cancer are considered highly vulnerable to the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. However, there are still few data on COVID‐19 occurring in hematologic patients. Methods One hundred two patients with COVID‐19 symptoms and a nasopharyngeal swab positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 seen at 2 hematologic departments located in Lombardy, Italy, during March 2020 were studied. Risk factors for acquiring COVID‐19 were analyzed by comparisons of patients with COVID‐19 and the standard hematologic population managed at the same institutions in 2019. Thirty‐day survival was compared with the survival of matched uninfected control patients with similar hematologic disorders and nonhematologic patients affected by COVID‐19. Results Male sex was significantly more prevalent in patients with COVID‐19. The infection occurred across all different types of hematologic disease; however, the risk of acquiring a COVID‐19 infection was lower for patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, including chronic myeloid leukemia, and higher for patients with immune‐mediated anemia on immunosuppressive‐related treatments. The 30‐day mortality rate was 39.2%, which was higher than the rates for nonhematologic patients with COVID‐19 (23.5%; P = .02) and uninfected hematologic controls (3%; P < .001). The severity of the respiratory syndrome at presentation and active hematologic treatment were independently associated with a worse prognosis. Neither diagnosis nor disease status affected the prognosis. The worst prognosis was demonstrated among patients on active hematologic treatment and those with more severe respiratory syndrome at COVID‐19 presentation. Conclusions During the COVID‐19 pandemic, patients should be advised to seek medical attention at the earliest signs of dyspnea and/or respiratory infection. Physicians should perform a risk‐benefit analysis to determine the impact of temporarily deferring nonlifesaving treatments versus the risk of adverse outcomes associated with COVID‐19. Lay Summary Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection occurs across all different types of hematologic disease; however, the risk of acquiring it is lower for patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, including chronic myeloid leukemia, and higher for patients with immune‐mediated anemia on immunosuppressive treatment. The 30‐day mortality rate is 39.2%, which is far higher than the rates for both uninfected hematologic controls (3%; P < .001) and nonhematologic patients with COVID‐19 (23.5%; P = .02) despite matching for age, sex, comorbidities, and severity of disease. Variables independently associated with a worse prognosis are the severity of the respiratory syndrome at presentation and any type of active hematologic treatment. Neither diagnosis nor disease status influence the prognosis.

Subcutaneously administered alemtuzumab was effective, safe, and well tolerated as consolidation therapy in patients with CLL who responded to fludarabine induction therapy. Subsequent PBSCT was feasible thereafter.

Lymphoma represents a heterogeneous hematological malignancy (HM), which is characterized by severe immunosuppression. Patients diagnosed of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the course of HM have been described to have poor outcome, with only few reports specifically addressing lymphoma patients. Here, we investigated the clinical behaviour and clinical parameters of a large multicenter cohort of adult patients with different lymphoma subtypes, with the aim of identifying predictors of death. The study included 856 patients, of whom 619 were enrolled prospectively in a 1-year frame and were followed-up for a median of 66 days (range 1-395). Patients were managed as outpatient (not admitted cohort, n=388), or required hospitalization (n=468), and median age was 63 years (range 19-94). Overall, the 30- and 100-days mortality was 13% (95%CI 11-15%) and 23% (95%CI 20-27%), respectively. Anti-lymphoma treatment, including anti-CD20 containing regimens, did not impact on survival. Patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma had the more favourable survival, but this was partly related to significantly younger age. The time interval between lymphoma diagnosis and COVID-19 was inversely related to mortality. Multivariable analysis recognized 4 easy-to-use factors (age, gender, lymphocyte, and platelet count) that were associated with risk of death, both in the admitted and in the not-admitted cohort (HR 3.79 and 8.85 for the intermediate and high-risk group, respectively). Overall, our study shows that patients should not be deprived of the best available treatment for their underlying disease, and indicates which patients are at higher risk of death. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352556.