Background:The pathomechanics of hip microinstability are not clearly defined but are thought to involve anatomical abnormalities, repetitive forces across the hip, and ligamentous laxity.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and hip capsular thickness. The hypothesis was that GJH would be predictive of a thin hip capsule.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A prospective study was performed on 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for the treatment of hip pain. A Beighton test score (BTS) was obtained prior to each procedure. The maximum score was 9, and a score of ≥4 was defined as hypermobile. Capsular thickness at the level of the anterior portal, corresponding to the location of the iliofemoral ligament, was measured arthroscopically using a calibrated probe. The presence of ligamentum teres (LT) pathology was also recorded.Results:Fifty-five women and 45 men were included in the study. The mean age was 32 years (range, 18-45 years). The median hip capsule thickness was statistically greater in men than women (12.5 and 7.5 mm, respectively). The median BTS for men was 1 compared with 4 for women (P < .001). A statistically significant association was found between BTS and capsular thickness; a BTS of <4 is strongly predictive of having a capsular thickness of ≥10 mm, while a BTS ≥4 correlates with a capsular thickness of <10 mm. There was a statistically greater incidence of LT tears in patients with a capsular thickness of ≤7.5 mm and a BTS of ≥4 (P < .001).Conclusion:Measurement of the GJH is highly predictive of hip capsular thickness. A BTS of <4 correlates significantly with a capsular thickness of ≥10 mm, while a BTS ≥4 correlates significantly with a thickness of <10 mm.

With both operating processes examined, 80% to 90% of the cases achieved good to very good results. The use of cross-pins can be recommended for fixing patellar bone quadriceps tendon autografts.

Arthroscopic resection of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) for subspine impingement has become a relatively common procedure. The AIIS is the origin of the direct head of rectus femoris (dhRF). Previous studies have reported that removal of the contributing portion of the AIIS causing impingement is unlikely to weaken the attachment of the dhRF. The purpose of this article is to report a case of avulsion of the dhRF, following revision hip arthroscopy for the treatment of subspine impingement. A 23-year-old professional footballer underwent revision left hip arthroscopy for the treatment of subspine impingement. 5-mm of bone was resected inferior to the AIIS. Two-weeks post-operatively, he presented with sudden onset, severe left anterior thigh pain following a fall and hyperextension of his left hip. The patient felt a pop over the anterior aspect of his hip. He noticed immediate swelling, severe pain and stiffness. Examination revealed diffuse swelling, 4/5-power on straight-leg-raise, focal tenderness over the AIIS but no palpable gap. MRI confirmed the clinical suspicion of a dhRF avulsion. Given the minimal loss of power and the lack of significant retraction, the patient was treated conservatively. He was instructed to avoid excessive hip extension. He returned to full participation at 3-months. This article highlights a case of avulsion of the dhRF due to a hyperextension injury of the hip following arthroscopic resection of subspinal impingement, a previously unreported complication. Resection of soft and bone from the AIIS may weaken the insertion of the dhRF. Care should be taken during post-operative rehabilitation to avoid trauma and excessive forces on the dhRF tendon, which may lead to rupture. Rehabilitation should be focused on range of motion of the hip.

The importance of the ligamentum teres (LT) in the hip is increasingly being recognized. However, the incidence of LT tears in the literature is extremely variable. Although classification systems exist their reliability in classifying LT pathology arthroscopically has not been well defined. To determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of two existing classifications systems for the diagnosis of LT pathology at hip arthroscopy. Second, to identify key pathological findings currently not included. Four experienced hip-arthroscopists reviewed 40 standardized arthroscopic videos. Arthroscopic findings of the LT were classified using the Gray and Villar (G&V) and descriptive classification (DC). Reviewers were asked to record other relevant pathology encountered. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was defined using Fleiss-Kappa and Cohen-Kappa statistics. Both classifications demonstrated fair inter-observer reliability. The intra-observer reliability for G&V was moderate-to-substantial and for DC was slight-to-moderate. An absolute agreement rate of 10% (G&V) and 37.5% (DC) was found. Differentiation between normal, and partial or low-grade tears was a common source of disagreement. The prevalence of LT pathology was 90%. Synovitis was the most common diagnostic finding that was not included in either classification system used in this study. Arthroscopic classification of LT pathology using the G&V and the DC demonstrated only fair inter-observer reliability. The major discrepancy in interpretation was between normal, and partial or low-grade tears. The presence of synovitis was not in either classification but was considered an important arthroscopic finding. Thorough arthroscopic scrutiny reveals the prevalence of LT pathology is higher than previously reported.

Treating symptomatic patients with dysplasia involves a controversy in therapy. The question is whether to obtain osseous correction with the help of pelvic reorientation osteotomy or to address intra-articular pathology with an arthroscopic approach. Neither isolated therapy nor the other method seems to be sufficient, but conducting both treatment options simultaneously has also not proved to be superior and carries the risk of additional complications. Different treatment options have been presented on this topic over the years and should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Pelvic reorientation osteotomy in patients with moderate to severe acetabular dysplasia remains uncontested, but it lacks the ability to obtain visualization of the central hip compartment. The isolated arthroscopic approach seems to be favorable for treatment of intra-articular pathologies in patients with mild to borderline dysplasia, whereas collateral arthroscopy in pelvic reorientation osteotomy may achieve better clinical outcomes in patients with more complex cases.