No abstract

Studies have aimed to quantify methane emissions associated with the growing natural gas infrastructure. Quantification is completed using direct or indirect methods—both of which typically represent only a snapshot in time. Most studies focused on collecting emissions data from multiple sites to increase sample size, thus combining the effects of geospatial and temporal variability (spatio-temporal variability). However, we examined the temporal variability in methane emissions from a single unconventional well site over the course of nearly 2 years (21 months) by conducting six direct quantification audits. We used a full flow sampling system that quantified methane mass emissions with an uncertainty of ±10%. Results showed significant temporal variation in methane mass emissions ranging from 86.2 to 4102 g/h with a mean of 1371 g/h. Our average emissions rate from this unconventional well pad tended to align with those presented in the literature. The largest contributor to variability in site emissions was the produced water tank which had emissions rates ranging from 17.3 to 3731 g/h. We compared our methane mass emissions with the total production for each audit and showed that relative methane loss rates ranged from 0.002 to 0.088% with a mean of 0.030%, typically lower than reported by the literature, noting that our data excluded well unloadings. We examined natural gas production, water production, and weather conditions for trends. The strongest correlation was between methane emissions and historical water production. Our data shows that even for a single site, a snapshot in time could significantly over-predict (3×) or under-predict (16×) methane emissions as compared to a long-term temporal average.

Other test method (OTM) 33A has been used to quantify emissions from natural gas sites since it was introduced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The method relies on point source Gaussian (PSG) assumptions to estimate emissions rates from a targeted site or source. However, the method often results in low accuracy (typically ±70%, even under conducive conditions). These accuracies were verified with controlled-release experiments. Typically, controlled releases were performed for short periods (15–20 min) under atmospheric conditions that were ideal for effective plume transport. We examined three methane release rates from three distances over various periods of time ranging from seven hours to seven days. Data were recorded continuously from a stationary tower. Atmospheric conditions were highly variable and not always conducive to conventional OTM 33A calculations. OTM 33A estimates were made for 20-min periods when the mean wind direction corresponded to ±90° of the direction from the controlled release to the tower. Further analyses were performed by varying the frequency of the data, the length of the individual OTM 33A periods and the size of the wind angle used to filter data. The results suggested that different (than conventionally used) period lengths, wind filters, data acquisition frequencies and data quality filters impacted the accuracy of OTM 33A when applied to long term measurements.

Understanding methane emissions from the natural gas supply chain continues to be of interest. Previous studies identified that measurements are skewed due to “super-emitters”, and recently, researchers identified temporal variability as another contributor to discrepancies among studies. We focused on the latter by performing 17 methane audits at a single production site over 4 years, from 2016 to 2020. Source detection was similar to Method 21 but augmented with accurate methane mass rate quantification. Audit results varied from ∼78 g/h to over 43 kg/h with a mean emissions rate of 4.2 kg/h and a geometric mean of 821 g/h. Such high variability sheds light that even quarterly measurement programs will likely yield highly variable results. Total emissions were typically dominated by those from the produced water storage tank. Of 213 sources quantified, a single tank measurement represented 60% of the cumulative emission rate. Measurements were separated into four categories: wellheads (n = 78), tank (n = 17), enclosed gas process units (n = 31), and others (n = 97). Each subgroup of measurements was skewed and fat-tailed, with the skewness ranging from 2.4 to 5.7 and kurtosis values ranging from 6.5 to 33.7. Analyses found no significant correlations between methane emissions and temperature, whole gas production, or water production. Since measurement results were highly variable and daily production values were known, we completed a Monte Carlo analysis to estimate average throughput-normalized methane emissions which yielded an estimate of 0.093 ± 0.013%.

No abstract

The process of unconventional natural gas recovery is becoming increasingly popular as the world's demand for alternative fuels continues to grow. Natural gas has the potential to be a widely used fuel in the near future due to its availability and potential to displace petroleum-based liquid fuels. As energy companies extract natural gas, current fuels, such as diesel, are consumed in mass quantities for drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations. In order to save on costs and in an attempt to reduce emissions, many companies are investing in dual fuel and dedicated natural gas engines to power operations. This trend results in new sources of methane emissions, which can contribute significantly to global warming. West Virginia University is aware of the potential impact of these emissions and is conducting research funded by the Department of Energy to assess methane emissions from dual fuel and dedicated natural gas technologies, as industry moves towards more extensive use of natural gas as a fuel for onsite power production. Unconventional Natural Gas PotentialThe recovery of unconventional natural gas is a growing industry in the United States (US) and around the world. As high-energy demands become a prevalent issue worldwide, the search for cheaper and cleaner alternative fuels becomes more critical. Natural gas is an option that is now becoming more widely available due to advances in the technologies required for its recovery. These technologies include horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), there is as much as 1,193 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the US that is capable of being recovered from unconventional sources [1]. The extraction of this natural gas results in high-energy demands and using natural gas as a fuel to power these operations leads to new sources of methane emissions. The three main sources of methane emissions include leaks and losses from onsite fueling equipment, methane vented from the crankcase, and uncombusted methane in the engine exhaust.

No abstract

Development of representative, engine dynamometer test cycles, from in-use activity data, is crucial in understanding fuel efficiency and emissions for engine operating modes that are different from cycles mandated by the Code of Federal Regulations. Representative cycles were created for the prime movers of unconventional well development-over-the-road (OTR) trucks and drilling and hydraulic fracturing engines. The representative cycles are implemented on scaled engines to reduce fuel consumption during research and development of new technologies in controlled laboratory environments.