FDG-PET-CT was more accurate than CT alone in staging BC in patients undergoing surgery. Standardization of FDG-PET-CT protocol and cost-effectiveness analysis are required before widespread implementation of this technology.
Purpose Ureteral obstruction in cervical cancer occurs in up to 11% of patients, many of whom undergo ureteral stenting. Our aim was to describe the patient burden of chronic ureteral stenting in a population-based cohort by detailing two objectives: (1) the frequency of repeat procedures for ureteral obstruction; and, (2) the frequency of urinary adverse effects (UAEs) (e.g., lower urinary tract symptoms, flank pain).Materials and Methods From SEER-Medicare, we identified 202 women who underwent ureteral stent placement prior to or following cervical cancer treatment. The frequency of repeat procedures and rate ratios were compared between treatment modalities. The rates and rate ratios of UAEs were compared between our primary cohort (stent + cervical cancer) and the following groups: no stent + cervical cancer, stent + no cancer, and no stent + no cancer. The “no cancer” group was drawn from the 5% Medicare sample.Results 117/202 women (58%) underwent >1 stent procedure. The frequency of additional procedures was significantly higher in patients who received radiation as part of their treatment. UAEs were very common in women with stent + cancer. The rate of UTI was 190 (per 100 person-years), 67 for LUTS, 42 for stones, and 6 for flank pain. These rates were 3-10 fold higher than in the no stent + no cancer control group; rates were also higher than in the no stent + cancer and the stent + no cancer women.Conclusions The burden of disease associated with ureteral stents is higher than expected and urologists should be actively involved in stent management, screening for associated symptoms and offering definitive reconstruction when appropriate.
Speech-language pathologists tend to rely on the noninstrumental swallowing evaluation in making recommendations about a patient's diet and management plan. The present study was designed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the accuracy of using the chin-down posture during the clinical/bedside swallowing assessment. In 15 patients with acute stroke and clinically suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia, the correlation between clinical and videofluoroscopic findings was examined. Results identified that there is a difference in outcome prediction using the chin-down posture during the clinical/bedside assessment of swallowing compared to assessment by videofluoroscopy. Results are discussed relative to statistical and clinical perspectives, including site of lesion and factors to be considered in the design of an overall treatment plan for a patient with disordered swallowing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.