No abstract

No abstract

Study Design. Retrospective database study. Objective. To assess the association between prolonged length of hospital stay (pLOS) (≥4 d) and unplanned readmission in patients undergoing elective spine surgery by controlling the clinical and statistical confounders. Summary of Background Data. pLOS has previously been cited as a risk factor for unplanned hospital readmission. This potentially modifiable risk factor has not been distinguished as an independent risk factor in a large-scale, multi-institutional, risk-adjusted study. Methods. Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis was used to reduce baseline differences between the cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the degree of association between pLOS and unplanned readmission. Results. From the 99,575 patients that fit the inclusion criteria, propensity score matching yielded 16,920 well-matched pairs (mean standard propensity score difference = 0.017). The overall 30-day unplanned readmission rate of these 33,840 patients was 5.5%. The mean length of stay was 2.0 ± 0.9 days and 6.0 ± 4.5 days (P ≤ 0.001) for the control and pLOS groups, respectively. In our univariate analysis, pLOS was associated with postoperative complications, especially medical complications (22.7% vs. 8.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of the propensity score-matched population, which adjusted identified confounders (P < 0.02 and ≥10 occurrences), showed pLOS was associated with an increased risk of 30-day unplanned readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.423, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.290–1.570, P < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients who undergo elective spine procedures who have any-cause pLOS (≥4 d) are at greater risk of having unplanned 30-day readmission compared with patients with shorter hospital stays. Level of Evidence: 4

No abstract

BACKGROUND:Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) often lead to devastating upper extremity deficits. Treatment frequently prioritizes restoring elbow flexion through transfer of various donor nerves; however, no consensus identifies optimal donor nerve sources.OBJECTIVE:To complete a meta-analysis to assess donor nerves for restoring elbow flexion after partial and total BPI (TBPI).METHODS:Original English language articles on nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion after BPI were included. Using a random-effects model, we calculated pooled, weighted effect size of the patients achieving a composite motor score of ≥M3, with subgroup analyses for patients achieving M4 strength and with TBPI. Meta-regression was performed to assess comparative efficacy of each donor nerve for these outcomes.RESULTS:Comparison of the overall effect size of the 61 included articles demonstrated that intercostal nerves and phrenic nerves were statistically superior to contralateral C7 (cC7; P = .025, <.001, respectively) in achieving ≥M3 strength. After stratification by TBPI, the phrenic nerve was still superior to cC7 in achieving ≥M3 strength (P = .009). There were no statistical differences among ulnar, double fascicle, or medial pectoral nerves in achieving ≥M3 strength. Regarding M4 strength, the phrenic nerve was superior to cC7 (P = .01) in patients with TBPI and the ulnar nerve was superior to the medial pectoral nerve (P = .036) for partial BPI.CONCLUSION:Neurotization of partial BPI or TBPI through the intercostal nerve or phrenic nerve may result in functional advantage over cC7. In patients with upper trunk injuries, neurotization using ulnar, median, or double fascicle nerve transfers has similarly excellent functional recovery.

No abstract

No abstract

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives To identify whether thresholds exist beyond which operative duration or age increases risks for complications among patients ≥65 years undergoing elective spine surgery. Methods Elective inpatient spine procedures unrelated to infection/trauma/tumor diagnoses in patients <65 years recorded in the 2006-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database were identified. Univariate analyses was used to compare 30 day complication rates among 5 operative duration and age-stratified groups. To quantify the risk of prolonged operative duration on complications, multivariate analyses were performed controlling for confounders. A generalized linear model was used to assess the individual and combined effect strength of age and operative duration on complication rates. Results Among 87,705 patients stratified by operative duration, 30 day complication rates rose nonlinearly as operative duration increased, with a sharp rise after 4.0-4.9 hours (28.3% at 4.0-4.9 hours, 51.7% at ≥5 hours, P < .001). Multivariate analysis found operative duration was independently associated with increased risk of overall complications (odds ratio 1.10→1.69, P < .001) and medical complications (odds ratio 1.19→1.98, P < .001). Although complication rates rose by age (all P < .001), age was not independently predictive of overall complications within any operative duration group on multivariate analysis. Operative duration had a greater effect (η2 P = .067) than age (η2 P = .003) on overall complication rates. Conclusions Increased operative duration was strongly associated with 30 day complication rates, particularly beyond a threshold of 5 hours. Furthermore, operative duration had a notably larger effect on overall complication rates than age.