No abstract

With vigilant monitoring and aggressive therapy for cancer treatment-induced diarrhea, particularly in patients with early warning signs of severe complications, morbidity and mortality may be reduced.

The consensus of the panel was that standardized assessment and management of diarrhea is required to effectively control CID. The panel agreed that further data from a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored intergroup trial is required to determine the optimal dosage of octreotide and its cost in the treatment of cancer. The panel also agreed that further clinical research is warranted to address significant questions about the most effective way to assess and treat CID.

No abstract

No abstract

The cancer treatment-related diarrhea caused by acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chemotherapeutic agents, particularly fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan, significantly affects patient morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms causing cancer treatment-related diarrhea are not fully understood, but histopathologic evidence points to a multifactorial process that causes an absorptive and secretory imbalance in the small bowel. Cancer treatment-related diarrhea could be life-threatening, yet assessment and treatment are not currently standardized. Several clinicians participated in a closed roundtable meeting to review the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) and GVHD-induced diarrhea, management issues in cancer treatment-induced diarrhea, and pharmacologic approaches to treatment. The meeting produced a proposal for new treatment guidelines and an algorithm, which include the use of octreotide for the management of CID- and GVHD-induced diarrhea. The development of diarrhea assessment guidelines that expand on the current National Cancer Institute criteria and allow for better patient management was also proposed.

Bariatric surgery performed at US academic centers is safe and associated with low mortality.

Meeting the minimum criteria ensures conduct of quality clinical trials; however, some sites may wish to incorporate value-added attributes to exceed GCP compliance. These attributes are proposed as performance goals rather than requirements, recognizing that all sites conducting research will not necessarily meet each attribute but may still conduct high-quality clinical trials.