[1] The accuracy of large-eddy simulations (LESs) of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) over complex terrain relies on the ability of the subgrid-scale (SGS) models to capture the effect of subgrid turbulent fluxes on the resolved fields of velocity and scalars (e.g., heat, water vapor, and pollutants). A common approach consists of parameterizing the SGS stresses and fluxes using eddy viscosity and eddy diffusivity models, respectively. These models require the specification of two parameters: the Smagorinsky coefficient in the eddy viscosity model and, in addition, the SGS Schmidt/ Prandtl number in the eddy diffusivity model. This is complicated by the dependence of the coefficients on local conditions such as distance to the ground, mean shear, and atmospheric stability. In this study, scale-dependent dynamic SGS models are used in conjunction with Lagrangian averaging to compute both the Smagorinsky coefficient and the SGS Schmidt (or Prandtl) number dynamically as the flow evolves in both space and time based on the local dynamics of the resolved scales. These tuning-free models are implemented in LES of both homogeneous and heterogeneous neutral atmospheric boundary layers with surface fluxes of a passive scalar. In the homogeneous simulations the models are shown to accurately predict the resolved flow statistics (mean profiles and spectra of velocity and scalar concentration) and spatial distributions of the SGS model coefficients and parameters. In simulations over heterogeneous surfaces both coefficients adjust in a self-consistent way to horizontal flow inhomogeneities associated with changes in surface conditions. For smooth-to-rough (rough-to-smooth) abrupt changes in surface roughness the Smagorinsky coefficient decreases (increases) in response to increased (decreased) mean shear and flow anisotropy associated with these transitions. The SGS Schmidt number also adjusts to inhomogeneities in the scalar field associated with changes in surface scalar flux. This illustrates the need for local calculation of model coefficients and brings into question the common practice of using a constant SGS Schmidt/Prandtl number in LES of the ABL.Citation: Stoll, R., and F. Porté-Agel (2006), Dynamic subgrid-scale models for momentum and scalar fluxes in large-eddy simulations of neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layers over heterogeneous terrain, Water Resour.
Large-eddy simulation (LES) of a stable atmospheric boundary layer is performed using recently developed dynamic subgrid-scale (SGS) models. These models not only calculate the Smagorinsky coefficient and SGS Prandtl number dynamically based on the smallest resolved motions in the flow, they also allow for scale dependence of those coefficients. This dynamic calculation requires statistical averaging for numerical stability. Here, we evaluate three commonly used averaging schemes in stable atmospheric boundary-layer simulations: averaging over horizontal planes, over adjacent grid points, and following fluid particle trajectories. Particular attention is focused on assessing the effect of the different averaging methods on resolved flow statistics and SGS model coefficients. Our results indicate that averaging schemes that allow the coefficients to fluctuate locally give results that are in better agreement with boundary-layer similarity theory and previous LES studies. Even among models that are local, the averaging method is found to affect model coefficient probability density function distributions and turbulent spectra of the resolved velocity and temperature fields. Overall, averaging along fluid pathlines is found to produce the best combination of self consistent model coefficients, first-and second-order flow statistics and insensitivity to grid resolution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.