SummaryThe Numeniini is a tribe of 13 wader species (Scolopacidae, Charadriiformes) of which seven are Near Threatened or globally threatened, including two Critically Endangered. To help inform conservation management and policy responses, we present the results of an expert assessment of the threats that members of this taxonomic group face across migratory flyways. Most threats are increasing in intensity, particularly in non-breeding areas, where habitat loss resulting from residential and commercial development, aquaculture, mining, transport, disturbance, problematic invasive species, pollution and climate change were regarded as having the greatest detrimental impact. Fewer threats (mining, disturbance, problematic native species and climate change) were identified as widely affecting breeding areas. Numeniini populations face the greatest number of non-breeding threats in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, especially those associated with coastal reclamation; related threats were also identified across the Central and Atlantic Americas, and East Atlantic flyways. Threats on the breeding grounds were greatest in Central and Atlantic Americas, East Atlantic and West Asian flyways. Three priority actions were associated with monitoring and research: to monitor breeding population trends (which for species breeding in remote areas may best be achieved through surveys at key non-breeding sites), to deploy tracking technologies to identify migratory connectivity, and to monitor land-cover change across breeding and non-breeding areas. Two priority actions were focused on conservation and policy responses: to identify and effectively protect key non-breeding sites across all flyways (particularly in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway), and to implement successful conservation interventions at a sufficient scale across human-dominated landscapes for species' recovery to be achieved. If implemented urgently, these measures in combination have the potential to alter the current population declines of many Numeniini species and provide a template for the conservation of other groups of threatened species.

No abstract

Color bands and radio tags are widely used to facilitate individual recognition and relocation of precocial chicks in studies of prefledging survival. However, the accuracy of data collected and subsequent estimates of survival rates rely on the assumption that such techniques do not affect the parameters under study. We compared the body condition and survival of color‐banded and radio‐tagged Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) chicks with noncolor‐banded and nonradio‐tagged individuals using a 10‐year dataset (N= 3174 chicks, with 205 color banded and 700 radio tagged). Color bands did not adversely affect chicks. However, radio‐tagged chicks and their untagged broodmates were handled more frequently because these broods were more readily encountered than those without a tagged member. Chicks disturbed and handled more frequently had lower body condition indices and higher mortality rates. Simulations of the impact of tagging and handling on breeding productivity under two scenarios indicated a 26% reduction in productivity in situations where nest and chick survival rates were low (as in our study), but only a 7% reduction in productivity for a simulated population with the higher levels of nest and chick survival associated with a stable population. The frequent disturbance associated with radio‐tracking and recapturing chicks, rather than the attachment of a tag or physical handling of chicks, may affect body condition. Frequent handling and disturbance may affect body condition by reducing foraging time, increasing stress levels, or increasing predation risk. Because our results suggested that the negative impact of handling could last up to a week, we recommend that investigators avoid disturbance of shorebird chicks more frequently than every 8 d.

The control of generalist predator populations is increasingly adopted as a management tool to combat declines in ground‐nesting bird populations. However, compensatory predation by uncontrolled species frequently occurs, so determining the relative impacts of different predatory species, and hence the relative benefits of their control, can be difficult. Islands, with their reduced faunas, provide natural experimental units for investigating specific predator–prey interactions in detail. We studied Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus breeding success on an island where feral Ferrets Mustela furo and Hooded Crows Corvus cornix were subjected to trial control regimes over 2 years. In both years, Lapwing hatching success was >80%, with neither Ferret nor Crow control selected as important predictors. Fledging rates in both years were 0.7 young per pair, despite highly effective predator removal, although Crow control potentially resulted in compensatory predation by Common Ravens C. corax. Neither mustelid nor corvid control produced significant immediate benefits for Lapwings. This suggests that mesopredator release of mustelids in mainland situations is unlikely to be a consistent threat to Lapwing, and provides further evidence that declines in this species are unlikely to be tackled successfully through predator management alone.

Lapwing Vanellus vanellus is known to be declining throughout much of its UK breeding range. The ecological requirements of the species are well known and a variety of mechanisms exist which can be implemented to help recovery. Arable options within agri‐environment schemes can be used to provide breeding habitat throughout the species’ UK range, and targeted recovery projects have been shown to have the potential to deliver increases in breeding pairs at the local level. The farming community need to be made aware of the requirements of Lapwing if agriculture and conservation needs are to be integrated.