Background: Although high soy consumption may be associated with lower breast cancer risk in Asian populations, findings from epidemiological studies have been inconsistent. Objective: We investigated the effects of soy intake on breast cancer risk among Korean women according to their menopausal and hormone receptor status. Methods: We conducted a case-control study with 358 incident breast cancer patients and 360 age-matched controls with no history of malignant neoplasm. Dietary consumption of soy products was examined using a 103-item food frequency questionnaire. Results: The estimated mean intakes of total soy and isoflavones from this study population were 76.5 g per day and 15.0 mg per day, respectively. Using a multivariate logistic regression model, we found a significant inverse association between soy intake and breast cancer risk, with a dose-response relationship (odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) for the highest vs the lowest intake quartile: 0.36 (0.20-0.64)). When the data were stratified by menopausal status, the protective effect was observed only among postmenopausal women (OR (95% CI) for the highest vs the lowest intake quartile: 0.08 (0.03-0.22)). The association between soy and breast cancer risk did not differ according to estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status, but the estimated intake of soy isoflavones showed an inverse association only among postmenopausal women with ER þ /PR þ tumors. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that high consumption of soy might be related to lower risk of breast cancer and that the effect of soy intake could vary depending on several factors.
Background: EGF30008 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study which evaluated the benefit of adding lapatinib (L) to letrozole (Let) alone in patient (pts) with hormone receptor positive (HR+), metastatic breast cancer. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with HER2+ tumors was significantly increased from 3 to 8.2 mos with dual therapy (HR [95% CI] =0.71 [0.53, 0.96], P=.019). Safety data presented at the 2008 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium demonstrated that the combination of L+Let was manageable and predictable, with no unexpected toxicity.Methods: 1286 pts were randomized 1:1 to treatment with Let versus L+Let. Safety data were collected from start of study drug until 30 days after discontinuation. The safety population was based on the actual treatment received (Let n=623; L+Let n=655). Updated adverse events (AEs) associated with L were evaluated at both pt and event level as a function of time on study. AEs were categorized into 4 groups: diarrhea, rash, cardiac, and hepatobiliary events. Multiple AE terms were classified within these groups.Results: Safety data through 03Feb09 are reported (additional 8 mos data beyond trial reporting). Let group: median exposure of Let=37.57 weeks (range 0.9-251.1). L+Let group: median exposure of Let= 40.43 (range 0.1-248.6) and median exposure of L=40.14 weeks (range 0.3-248.6). Overall, there were 537 AE events (86%) in the Let alone group, and 629 (96%) in the L+Let group. Incidence, counts, and time to first occurrence of AEs associated with HER1 and HER2 inhibition are summarized below. Let (n=623)L+Let (n=655)Rash Pts with AE, n95 (15%)328 (50%)- Max Grade 30.012 (4%)- Max Grade 40.00.0AEs (n events)123638- Leading to study withdrawal1 (<1%)11 (2%)Median time to 1st onset, days7720Diarrhea Pts with AE, n127 (20%)419 (64%)- Max Grade 36 (5%)59 (14%)- Max Grade 40.02 (<1%)AEs (n events)1721026- Leading to study withdrawal2 (1%)22 (2%)Median time to 1st onset, days6114Hepatobiliary Pts with AE, n50 (8%)102 (16%)- Max Grade 39 (18%)33 (32%)- Max Grade 43 (6%)4 (4%)AEs (n events)103405- Leading to study drug withdrawal3 (3%)13 (3%)Median time to 1st onset12463LVEF decreases Pts with AE, n18 (3%)34 (5%)- Grade 32 (11%)8 (18%)- Grade 40.01 (3%)AEs (n events)1941- Leading to study drug withdrawal4 (21%)8 (20%)Median time to 1st onset, days323165 Graphs of AEs as a function of time as well as details on pts with multiple events will also be provided.Conclusion: Relatively few AEs were grade 3/4 or led to study drug discontinuation. Incidence, severity, and recovery of each toxicity as a function of time will be presented. The safety profile of L+Let remains consistent with the 8 additional months of data since initial reporting of study results. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5094.
Regulated autophagy is involved in the repair of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). ω3-Polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω3-PUFAs) show protective effects against various renal injuries. It was recently reported that ω3-PUFAs regulate autophagy. We assessed whether ω3-PUFAs attenuated IR-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and evaluated associated mechanisms. C57Bl/6 background fat-1 mice and wild-type mice (wt) were divided into four groups: wt sham (n = 10), fat-1 sham (n = 10), wt IRI (reperfusion 35 min after clamping both the renal artery and vein; n = 15), and fat-1 IRI (n = 15). Kidneys and blood were harvested 24 h after IRI. Renal histological and molecular data were collected. The kidneys of fat-1 mice showed better renal cell survival, renal function, and pathological damage than those of wt mice after IRI. In addition, fat-1 mice showed less oxidative stress and autophagy impairment; greater amounts of LC3, Beclin-1, and Atg7; lower amounts of p62; and higher levels of renal cathepsin D and ATP6E than wt kidneys. They also showed more AMPK activation, which resulted in the inhibition of phosphorylation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Collectively, ω3-PUFAs in fat-1 mice contributed to AMPK mediated autophagy activation, leading to a renoprotective response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.