Nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline are oral antibiotics for the treatment or prophylaxis of acute urinary tract infections. New interest in both these drugs is increasing because of the emergence of resistance to other antibiotics, but knowledge of their pharmacokinetics (PK) is lacking since they were developed before the advent of standardized research for drug approval. The aims of this review were to (i) summarize the PK data reported in the literature and (ii) to identify PK knowledge gaps. The current body of PK knowledge of both drugs appears to be poor and mainly based on old studies. Nitrofurantoin PK values were obtained from studies using many variables, e.g. formulations, crystal sizes and analytical methods, resulting in high interindividual variability in PK parameters and no uniform PK profile. Clinical experience and PK data for nitroxoline are even more limited since the drug is registered in only Germany and a few (Eastern European) countries. Clinical studies in relevant patient populations are needed with commercially available nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline formulations at approved dosing regimens to more fully characterize their PK profiles, and to investigate the influence of patient characteristics on these profiles in order to optimize efficacy and avoid toxicity and emergence of resistance. Only with this updated knowledge and efficacy data from well-structured trials can both drugs maintain their antimicrobial activity against uropathogens.

Considerable interindividual variability observed in the pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin signifies a risk for inadequate drug exposure in a significant proportion of the population. The current dosing regimen should therefore be reevaluated.

Fosfomycin is an old antibiotic that is increasingly prescribed because of emergence of the antibiotic resistance and the growing incidence of multi-drug resistant infections. Surprisingly, little is known about its pharmacokinetics (PK) and the pharmacodynamics (PD). Quantification of fosfomycin in both urine and plasma provides insight into the PK/PD characteristics of fosfomycin, which is crucial for the optimization of the therapy and the prevention of the emergence of resistance. An analytical method is therefore needed for the quantification of fosfomycin in both urine and plasma. A fast and sensitive tandem mass spectrometry method in combination with HILIC chromatography for the quantification of fosfomycin with a universal sample preparation method for urine and plasma was developed and validated according to FDA guidelines. The universal sample preparation method only requires 100μL of a sample, the addition of the internal standard fosfomycin-13C benzylamine and an ultrafiltration step. The method is applicable for the concentration range of 0.75-375mg/L (R of 0.9998 in both matrices) encompassing the clinically relevant concentration range based on the susceptibility of possible (uro)pathogens in the clinical setting. The validation results for urine and plasma for all QC levels, were <2.1% and <3.2% for accuracy, <1.5% and <1.7% for within day precision and <5.0% and <3.8% for between day precision, respectively. No matrix effects were encountered and the total recovery in urine and plasma was high (102.5% and 99.4%). Prepared samples were stable at 4°C and 15°C for at least 72h and stored samples at -80°C were stable for at least 6 months. Selectivity and sensitivity were confirmed and no carry-over was observed. The method was successfully applied in two pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers and patients respectively.

No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionThe emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has driven renewed interest in older antibacterials, including colistin. Previous studies have shown that colistin is less effective and more toxic than modern antibiotics. In vitro synergy studies and clinical observational studies suggest a benefit of combining colistin with a carbapenem. A randomised controlled study is necessary for clarification.Methods and analysisThis is a multicentre, investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised controlled superiority 1:1 study comparing colistin monotherapy with colistin–meropenem combination therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The study is being conducted in 6 centres in 3 countries (Italy, Greece and Israel). We include patients with hospital-associated and ventilator-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections and urosepsis. The primary outcome is treatment success at day 14, defined as survival, haemodynamic stability, stable or improved respiratory status for patients with pneumonia, microbiological cure for patients with bacteraemia and stability or improvement of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Secondary outcomes include 14-day and 28-day mortality as well as other clinical end points and safety outcomes. A sample size of 360 patients was calculated on the basis of an absolute improvement in clinical success of 15% with combination therapy. Outcomes will be assessed by intention to treat. Serum colistin samples are obtained from all patients to obtain population pharmacokinetic models. Microbiological sampling includes weekly surveillance samples with analysis of resistance mechanisms and synergy. An observational trial is evaluating patients who met eligibility requirements but were not randomised in order to assess generalisability of findings.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by ethics committees at each centre and informed consent will be obtained for all patients. The trial is being performed under the auspices of an independent data and safety monitoring committee and is included in a broad dissemination strategy regarding revival of old antibiotics.Trial registration numberNCT01732250 and 2012-004819-31; Pre-results.

Using dynamic in vitro simulations of urinary fosfomycin exposures, E. coli and E. cloacae isolates with MIC >16 mg/L, and all K. pneumoniae isolates, were not reliably killed. Emergence of resistance was significant. This challenges fosfomycin dosing and clinical breakpoints, and questions the utility of fosfomycin against K. pneumoniae. Further work on in vitro dose optimization is required.

No abstract