The authors found an increase in heart rate and in BP associated with parasympathetic heart rate control decrease in stabilized obese normotensive children.

Hypertension and obesity are risk factors for coronary heart diseases in adults. In turn, childhood overweight and high blood pressure increase the risk of subsequent obesity and hypertension in adulthood. Human obesity is characterized by profound alterations of hemodynamic and metabolic states. Whether these alterations involve sympathetic nervous system control on cardiac function is controversial. We report the results of our study, conducted in a sample of obese adolescents by using power spectral analysis of heart rate variability. An increase in sympathetic tone coupled with a reduction in vagal tone was found. This allowed us to hypothesize that autonomic nervous system changes depend on the time course of obesity development. It is still unclear if treatment of obesity in adolescence prevents subsequent autonomic imbalance and hypertension.

AimdBackground: An impairment of baroreceptor sensitivity has been found in liver cirrhosis. Noninvasive and spontaneous estimates of baroreflex sensitivity are obtained from beat-to-beat blood pressure and heart rate recordings by means of cross-spectrum analysis and calculation of alpha-index (as a measure of baroreflex gain). The aim of the present study was to investigate the function of the spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity related to clinical Child score in liver cirrhosis. Methods; The alpha-index was evaluated in 40 cirrhotic patients (18 with and 22 without ascites) and 17 healthy subjects by analysing finger arterial pressure recorded noninvasively with the Portapres device. Results: Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly lower in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites compared with healthy subjects (p<0.01). Furthermore, in patients with ascites the baroreflex gain was significantly related to plasma sodium (p<0.01). A significant inverse relationship was present between baroreflex gain and grade of Child score and the severity of ascites (p

The resistant hypertension has been differentiated in true resistant hypertension and white-coat resistant hypertension by using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. White-coat resistant hypertension was defined as high clinic blood pressure, despite triple treatment for at least 3 months, but day-time blood pressure values < 135/85 mmHg. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of different clinical characteristics between two types of resistant hypertension. The study group consisted of 49 patients with essential hypertension, resistant to an adequate and appropriate triple-drug therapy, that included a diuretic, with all 3 drugs prescribed in near maximal doses and that had persistently elevated clinic blood pressure (> 140/90 mm Hg), for at least 3 months. They represented the 2% of 2500 hypertensive outpatients that referred at our Hypertension Unit. Patients with white-coat resistant hypertension (n=19) were older (p<0.05) than those with true resistant hypertension (n=30). The sodium intake (p<0.05) and alcohol intake (p<0.05) were significantly higher in patients with true resistant hypertension than in those with white-coat resistant hypertension. The renin plasma activity and plasma aldosterone were higher (p<0.05) in patients with true resistant hypertension than in those with white-coat resistant hypertension with normal plasma electrolyte balance. There were no significant differences in mean values of office systolic and diastolic blood pressures between white coat resistant hypertensives and true resistant hypertensives (165+17 vs 172+28 and 98+12 vs 102+14 mmHg). Day-time and night-time ambulatory 24-h-systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly higher in the true resistant hypertensive patients when compared with white-coat resistant hypertensives (153+15 vs 124+10 mmHg and 97+9 vs 76+6 mmHg all p<0.001). Day-time and night-time ambulatory 24-h-heart rate were significantly higher in the true resistant hypertensive patients when compared with white-coat resistant hypertensives (79+11 vs 71+9 beats/min; p<0.01; 68+9 vs 60+6 beats/min, p<0.001). The ABP readings were analysed by a Fourier series with 4 harmonics. According to the runs test both two groups of patients showed a circadian rhythm for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The nocturnal fall in SBP, DBP and HR was not different in both groups of patients. In conclusion, our findings showed that true resistant hypertensive patients were characterized both by higher heart rate and higher plasma renin activity values as an expression of a possible increased sympathetic activity. Thus, the combination of ABPM with the assessment of the clinical characteristics allow to differentiate better the true drug-resistant hypertension from the white coat resistant hypertension.

No abstract