There has been a controversy in the last 15 years on the correct management of brain stem cavernomas. We have reviewed our experience of the last 10 years in a single Institution and reviewed related literature published in the last 15 years. We recorded the demographics, clinical presentation, rebleeding episodes, incidence of neurological events and outcome assessed by recording the change of the modified Rankin scale in 21 cases. Univariate analysis was applied to test the effect of demographics, and presentation on the incidence and timing of rebleeding, chance of having a new neurological event, the number of subsequent neurological events and outcomes. Six cases were treated with surgery and 15 cases were managed conservatively. We obtained follow-up data in 20 patients (95%). Mean follow-up period was 79.7 months (range: 6-244, median 70 months). There were 0.05 rebleeding events per patient-year and 0.1 episodes of neurological deterioration per patient-year. No mortality was noted in either the surgical or the non-surgical group. Three of the six surgical cases had a reoperation. The outcome was improved in one patient, unchanged in 1, and worse in 3 surgical patients. In the case of conservative management the outcome was improved in two patients, unchanged in five patients, and worse in eight patients. Outcome was worse in the case of multiple cavernomas (p = 0.012). Our findings suggest that conservative management may be appropriate in individual cases when compared with surgery, but this difference was not statistically significant enough in order to support a change in practice. The natural history of brain stem cavernomas appears more benign than previously thought.
A 70-year-old woman with the isolated anomaly of azygos continuation of the inferior vena cava is presented. The interest in this anomaly lies in its presentation as a mediastinal mass on the chest roentgenogram. This article reviews the embryogenesis and the diagnostic testing of this venous anomaly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.