Muscle T2, fc-T2 and FF measurements exhibit content validity with reference to semi-quantitative scoring of STIR and T1 MRI, and also exhibit construct validity with reference to several myositis activity and damage measures. T2 was as responsive as fc-T2 and STIR scoring, although progression of muscle damage was negligible during the study.

Objective:Given the difficulties regarding the interpretation of common laboratory test results in polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) in clinical practice, we assessed their range of abnormalities, differences among phenotypes and interrelationships in a large referral population.Methods:We retrospectively assessed 20 commonly measured blood laboratory tests in 620 well-defined PM/DM patients at different stages of illness and treatment to determine the frequency, range of abnormalities and correlations among clinical, gender, racial and age phenotypes.Results:Myositis patients at various stages of their disease showed frequent elevations of the serum activities of creatine kinase (51%), alanine aminotransferase (43%), aspartate aminotransferase (51%), lactate dehydrogenase (60%), aldolase (65%) and myoglobin levels (48%) as expected. Other frequent abnormalities, however, included elevated high white blood cell counts (36%), low lymphocyte counts (37%), low hematocrit levels (29%), low albumin levels (22%), high creatine kinase MB isoenzyme fractions (52%), high erythrocyte sedimentation rates (33%) and high IgM and IgG levels (16% and 18%, respectively). Many of these tests significantly differed among the clinical, gender, racial and age groups. Significant correlations were also found among a number of these laboratory tests, particularly in the serum activity levels of creatine kinase, the transaminases, lactate dehydrogenase and aldolase.Conclusion:Laboratory test abnormalities are common in PM/DM. Knowledge of the range of these expected abnormalities in different myositis phenotypes, gender and age groups and their correlations should assist clinicians in better interpretation of these test results, allow for a clearer understanding what level of abnormality warrants further evaluation for liver or other diseases, and may avoid unnecessary laboratory or other testing.

Background: Ambulation is an essential aspect of daily living and is often impaired after brain and spinal cord injuries. Despite the implementation of standard neurorehabilitative care, locomotor recovery is often incomplete. Objective: In this randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, parallel design study, we aimed to determine if anodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (anodal tsDCS) could improve training effects on locomotion compared to sham (sham tsDCS) in healthy subjects. Methods: 43 participants underwent a single backwards locomotion training (BLT) session on a reverse treadmill with concurrent anodal (n=22) or sham (n=21) tsDCS. The primary outcome measure was speed gain measured 24 hours post-training. We hypothesized that anodal tsDCS+BLT would improve training effects on backward locomotor speed compared to sham tsDCS+BLT. A subset of participants (n=31) returned for two additional training days of either anodal (n=16) or sham (n=15) tsDCS and underwent (n=29) H-reflex testing immediately before, immediately after, and 30 minutes post-training over three consecutive days. Results: A single session of anodal tsDCS+BLT elicited greater speed gain at 24 hours relative to sham tsDCS+BLT (p=0.008, two-sample t-test, adjusted for one interim analysis after the initial 12 subjects). Anodal tsDCS+BLT resulted in higher retention of the acquired skill at day 30 relative to sham tsDCS+BLT (p=0.002) in the absence of significant group differences in online or offline learning over the three training days (p=0.467 and p=0.131). BLT resulted in transient down-regulation of H-reflex amplitude (Hmax/Mmax) in both test groups (p<0.0001). However, the concurrent application of anodal-tsDCS with BLT elicited a longer lasting effect than sham-tsDCS+BLT (p=0.050). Conclusion: TsDCS improved locomotor skill acquisition and retention in healthy subjects and prolonged the physiological exercise-mediated downregulation of excitability of the alpha motoneuron pool. These results suggest that this strategy is worth exploring in neurorehabilitation of locomotor function.

Background: Response inhibition refers to the ability to stop an on-going action quickly when it is no longer appropriate. Previous studies showed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied with the anode over the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC), a critical node of the fronto-basal ganglia inhibitory network, improved response inhibition. However, the tDCS effects on brain activity and network connectivity underlying this behavioral improvement are not known.Objective: This study aimed to address the effects of tDCS applied with the anode over the rIFC on brain activity and network functional connectivity underlying the behavioral change in response inhibition. Methods: Thirty participants performed a stop-signal task in a typical laboratory setting as a baseline during the first study visit (i.e., Session 1). In the second visit (at least 24 h after Session 1), all participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) scans before and after 1.5 mA tDCS (Anodal or Sham). Immediately following the post-tDCS rsfMRI, participants performed the same stop-signal task as in Session 1 during an event-related fMRI (efMRI) scan in a 3T scanner. Changes in task performance, i.e., the stop-signal response time (SSRT), a measure of response inhibition efficiency, was determined relative to the participants' own baseline performance in Session 1. Results: Consistent with previous findings, Anodal tDCS facilitated the SSRT. efMRI results showed that Anodal tDCS strengthened the functional connectivity between right pre-supplementary motor area (rPreSMA) and subthalamic nuclei during Stop responses. rsfMRI revealed changes in intrinsic connectivity between rIFC and caudate, and between rIFC, rPreSMA, right inferior parietal cortex (rIPC), and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) after Anodal tDCS. In addition, corresponding to the regions of rsfMRI connectivity change, the efMRI BOLD signal in the rDLPFC and rIPC during Go responses accounted for 74% of the variance in SSRT after anodal tDCS, indicating an effect of tDCS on the Go-Stop process. Conclusion:These results indicate that tDCS with the anode over the rIFC facilitates response inhibition by modulating neural activity and functional connectivity in the fronto-basal ganglia as well as rDLPFC and rIPC as an integral part of the response inhibition network.