Abstract:1. Pollination is an important ecosystem service as many agricultural crops such as fruit trees are pollinated by insects. Agricultural intensification, however, is one of the main drivers resulting in a serious decline of pollinator populations worldwide. 2. In this study pollinator communities were examined in twelve apple orchards surrounded by either homogeneous or heterogeneous landscape in Hungary. Pollinators (honey bees, wild bees, hoverflies) were surveyed in the flowering period of apple trees. Landscape heterogeneity was characterized in circles of 300, 500 and 1000 m radius around each orchard using Shannon's diversity and Shannon's evenness indices. 3. We found that pollination success of apple was significantly related to the species richness of wild bees, regardless the dominance of honey bees. 4. Diversity of the surrounding landscape matrix had a marginal positive effect on the species richness of hoverflies at 300m, positive effect on the species richness of wild bees at 500m radius circle, while evenness of the surrounding landscape enhanced the abundance of wild bees at 500m radius circle. Flower resources in the groundcover within the orchards supported honey bees. 5. Therefore maintenance of semi-natural habitats within 500m around apple orchards is highly recommended to enhance wild pollinator communities and apple production. Apple is one of the most important insect pollinated crops in the European Union, accounting 51 for 16% of the EU's total economic gains attributed to insect (particularly bee) pollination 52 (Leonhardt et al., 2013). Most apple varieties are cross-pollinated and insect pollination not 53 only affects the quantity of apple production, but can also have marked impacts on the quality 54 of the fruits, influencing size, shape and their market price (Garratt et al., 2014a). The most 55 common insect pollinator of apple is the honey bee (Apis mellifera); however, it is not the bees (Bosch & Blas, 1994). Hoverflies (Syrphidae) have also been observed with pollen loads 63 containing a high proportion of compatible fruit pollen (Kendall, 1973). Agricultural and Forest Entomology 64In the temperate zone, pollinator insects are under threat from a number of limiting 65 factors, such as climate change (Rader et al., 2013), human disturbance (Goulson et al., 66 2008), agricultural intensification (Kearns et al., 1998; Steffan-Dewenter et al., 2005; 67 Fitzpatrick et al., 2006; Memmott et al., 2007), and landscape fragmentation (Aizen & 68 Feisinger, 2003; Diekötter & Crist, 2013), which leads to less effective pollination and 69 reduces agricultural production (Floyd, 1992; Garibaldi et al., 2011a Garibaldi et al., , 2013 (Kremen et al., 2002; Brittain et al., 2013). Maintaining diverse communities, 94Apple is the most important fruit tree in Hungary, as it provides 60 % of the total 95Hungarian fruit production, and currently amounts to 400-600 thousand tons annually on We constructed generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) for each response variab...

Abstract:1. Pollination is an important ecosystem service as many agricultural crops such as fruit trees are pollinated by insects. Agricultural intensification, however, is one of the main drivers resulting in a serious decline of pollinator populations worldwide. 2. In this study pollinator communities were examined in twelve apple orchards surrounded by either homogeneous or heterogeneous landscape in Hungary. Pollinators (honey bees, wild bees, hoverflies) were surveyed in the flowering period of apple trees. Landscape heterogeneity was characterized in circles of 300, 500 and 1000 m radius around each orchard using Shannon's diversity and Shannon's evenness indices. 3. We found that pollination success of apple was significantly related to the species richness of wild bees, regardless the dominance of honey bees. 4. Diversity of the surrounding landscape matrix had a marginal positive effect on the species richness of hoverflies at 300m, positive effect on the species richness of wild bees at 500m radius circle, while evenness of the surrounding landscape enhanced the abundance of wild bees at 500m radius circle. Flower resources in the groundcover within the orchards supported honey bees. 5. Therefore maintenance of semi-natural habitats within 500m around apple orchards is highly recommended to enhance wild pollinator communities and apple production. Apple is one of the most important insect pollinated crops in the European Union, accounting 51 for 16% of the EU's total economic gains attributed to insect (particularly bee) pollination 52 (Leonhardt et al., 2013). Most apple varieties are cross-pollinated and insect pollination not 53 only affects the quantity of apple production, but can also have marked impacts on the quality 54 of the fruits, influencing size, shape and their market price (Garratt et al., 2014a). The most 55 common insect pollinator of apple is the honey bee (Apis mellifera); however, it is not the bees (Bosch & Blas, 1994). Hoverflies (Syrphidae) have also been observed with pollen loads 63 containing a high proportion of compatible fruit pollen (Kendall, 1973). Agricultural and Forest Entomology 64In the temperate zone, pollinator insects are under threat from a number of limiting 65 factors, such as climate change (Rader et al., 2013), human disturbance (Goulson et al., 66 2008), agricultural intensification (Kearns et al., 1998; Steffan-Dewenter et al., 2005; 67 Fitzpatrick et al., 2006; Memmott et al., 2007), and landscape fragmentation (Aizen & 68 Feisinger, 2003; Diekötter & Crist, 2013), which leads to less effective pollination and 69 reduces agricultural production (Floyd, 1992; Garibaldi et al., 2011a Garibaldi et al., , 2013 (Kremen et al., 2002; Brittain et al., 2013). Maintaining diverse communities, 94Apple is the most important fruit tree in Hungary, as it provides 60 % of the total 95Hungarian fruit production, and currently amounts to 400-600 thousand tons annually on We constructed generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) for each response variab...

Article 25fa states that the author of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds is entitled to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work.This publication is distributed under The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) 'Article 25fa implementation' project. In this project research outputs of researchers employed by Dutch Universities that comply with the legal requirements of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act are distributed online and free of cost or other barriers in institutional repositories. Research outputs are distributed six months after their first online publication in the original published version and with proper attribution to the source of the original publication.

There is an increasing recognition of the contribution to pollination made by wild bees and other insect groups (e.g. flies, beetles, butterflies) as pollinators within natural and agro-ecosystems (Garibaldi et al.,

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Pollinators face multiple pressures and there is evidence of populations in decline. As demand for insect-pollinated crops increases, crop production is threatened by shortfalls in pollination services. Understanding the extent of current yield deficits due to Manuscript

Farmland biodiversity is strongly declining in most of Western Europe, but still survives in traditional low intensity agricultural landscapes in Central and Eastern Europe. Accession to the EU however intensifies agriculture, which leads to the vanishing of traditional farming. Our aim was to describe the pollinator assemblages of the last remnants of these landscapes, thus set the baseline of sustainable farming for pollination, and to highlight potential measures of conservation. In these traditional farmlands in the Transylvanian Basin, Romania (EU accession in 2007), we studied the major pollinator groups—wild bees, hoverflies and butterflies. Landscape scale effects of semi-natural habitats, land cover diversity, the effects of heterogeneity and woody vegetation cover and on-site flower resources were tested on pollinator communities in traditionally managed arable fields and grasslands. Our results showed: (i) semi-natural habitats at the landscape scale have a positive effect on most pollinators, especially in the case of low heterogeneity of the direct vicinity of the studied sites; (ii) both arable fields and grasslands hold abundant flower resources, thus both land use types are important in sustaining pollinator communities; (iii) thus, pollinator conservation can rely even on arable fields under traditional management regime. This has an indirect message that the tiny flower margins around large intensive fields in west Europe can be insufficient conservation measures to restore pollinator communities at the landscape scale, as this is still far the baseline of necessary flower resources. This hypothesis needs further study, which includes more traditional landscapes providing baseline, and exploration of other factors behind the lower than baseline level biodiversity values of fields under agri-environmental schemes (AES).

Pollinators have experienced a dramatic decrease world‐wide due to agricultural intensification. In many countries, agri‐environment schemes (AES) have been introduced to counteract this current trend. However, until now, the relative importance of each AES for biodiversity and ecosystem services is still little understood and might change depending on landscape context. Complex landscape‐experiments are required to fill this knowledge gap, enabling the implementation of sustainable intensification of food production. In our study, we compared the effectiveness of the two most popular AES in Germany, organic farming and flower strips, in supporting pollinators and flower resources. We selected nine landscapes along a gradient of increasing field size, (configurational heterogeneity), each with a triplet of winter wheat fields: one organic, one conventional with flower strip and one conventional without flower strip as a control. We surveyed insect‐pollinated plants and pollinators (bumblebees, solitary bees and hoverflies). Additionally, we placed bumblebee colonies in the field edges to monitor their growth (colony weight gain) and reproduction (queen production). Flower strips stood out with the highest abundance and richness of pollinators. In contrast, bumblebee colony growth and plant richness benefited equally from organic and flower strip schemes. At the landscape scale, smaller fields had a positive effect on plant richness and bumblebee reproduction in flower strips. By contrast, bumblebee colonies in organic agriculture benefited most from large fields, as large organic fields provided much more flower resources than the narrow flower strips. Synthesis and applications. Our results showed that both local and landscape management shaped pollinator communities and their reproduction. Overall, organic farming and flower strips appeared to be effective tools to mitigate flower shortage in conventional cereal fields, with organic farming supporting the highest flowering plant cover per field. Flower strips enhanced local pollinator richness most, but increased bumblebee reproduction only when the surrounding landscapes had small fields with long field borders. Therefore, our results reveal that European Union policies need to take into account that the effectiveness of agri‐environment schemes depends on the structure of the surrounding landscape.