We document two clusters of LCMV infection transmitted through organ transplantation.

Background Colombia began official surveillance for Zika virus disease (ZVD) in August 2015. In October 2015, an outbreak of ZVD was declared after laboratory-confirmed disease was identified in nine patients. Methods Using the national population-based surveillance system, we assessed patients with clinical symptoms of ZVD from August 9, 2015, to April 2, 2016. Laboratory test results and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated for a subgroup of pregnant women. Concurrently, we investigated reports of microcephaly for evidence of congenital ZVD. Results By April 2, 2016, there were 65,726 cases of ZVD reported in Colombia, of which 2485 (4%) were confirmed by means of reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The overall reported incidence of ZVD among female patients was twice that in male patients. A total of 11,944 pregnant women with ZVD were reported in Colombia, with 1484 (12%) of these cases confirmed on RT-PCR assay. In a subgroup of 1850 pregnant women, more than 90% of women who were reportedly infected during the third trimester had given birth, and no infants with apparent abnormalities, including microcephaly, have been identified. A majority of the women who contracted ZVD in the first or second trimester were still pregnant at the time of this report. Among the cases of microcephaly investigated from January 2016 through April 2016, four patients had laboratory evidence of congenital ZVD; all were born to asymptomatic mothers who were not included in the ZVD surveillance system. Conclusions Preliminary surveillance data in Colombia suggest that maternal infection with the Zika virus during the third trimester of pregnancy is not linked to structural abnormalities in the fetus. However, the monitoring of the effect of ZVD on pregnant women in Colombia is ongoing. (Funded by Colombian Instituto Nacional de Salud and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).

Children and adolescents are susceptible to SARS-associated coronavirus infection, although the clinical course and outcome are more favorable in children younger than 12 years of age compared with adolescents and adults. Transmission of SARS from pediatric patients appears to be uncommon but is possible.

Rubella virus infection is typically diagnosed by the identification of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulinSymptomatic rubella is characterized by a mild fever and a maculopapular rash of short duration. The clinical diagnosis of rubella is unreliable, and many rash illnesses, such as those caused by measles virus and parvovirus B19, mimic rubella (2). Therefore, laboratory confirmation is essential for the diagnosis of rubella and is typically done by testing serum samples for rubella virus (RV)-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies. Serum IgM and IgG responses to RV develop rapidly in the first few days after the onset of rash. However, approximately 50% of samples collected on the day of rash onset test negative for RV-specific IgM antibodies (1, 9, 17). Often, only a single serum sample taken near the time of rash onset is available, resulting in the lack of serologic confirmation of many rubella cases. Thus, the development of a rapid laboratory diagnostic tool for the confirmation of rubella within the first few days of symptom onset would improve the ability to confirm rubella.The isolation of virus in cell culture or the detection of viral RNA by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) also provides reliable evidence of RV infection (26). Unfortunately, blood is not a good sample for use for the detection of RV, because the highest viral titers in blood typically occur before the onset of rash and virus is undetectable in blood by 2 days after rash onset (6). The virus titer in throat swabs, however, usually reaches a peak titer on the day of rash onset and the titers in throat swabs decline more slowly than those in blood, so that virus can be detected for up to 5 to 7 days after rash onset (6). Several RT-PCR assays for the detection of the RV genome in clinical samples have been described (3,7,15,16,20,25). Templates for the determination of viral sequences for molecular epidemiology can also be made by using RT-PCR.The use of alternative specimens could help reduce the obstacles to specimen collection, storage, and transport in the field (22). Oral fluid (OF), which is collected by rubbing an absorptive device between the gum and the cheek, can be obtained by a method that is relatively noninvasive, is easier to obtain than blood, and has the advantage that it can be used for both RVspecific antibody detection and RV genome detection (12,19,20). Currently, in the United Kingdom, OF samples from notified clinically diagnosed cases are collected between 1 and 6 weeks after the onset of symptoms and are transported by mail to the Central Public Health Laboratory, where they are tested for specific antibody and viral RNA by RT-PCR. By the use of this strategy, specimens from 54.6% of rubella notifications from 1995 through 2001 were obtained for laboratory testing and specimens from 12.7% of the rubella notifications were confirmed to represent rubella cases (20,21).

The optimal timing for collection of a single serum specimen to diagnose measles by using a monoclonal antibody-capture EIA was evaluated. Results of testing paired serum samples from 166 measles cases with at least 1 IgM-positive specimen were analyzed. Among persons whose second samples were IgM-positive, the seropositivity rate for first samples was 77% when collected within 72 h and 100% when collected 4-11 days after rash onset. Among unvaccinated persons whose first samples were IgM-positive, the rate for IgM positivity of second specimens declined from 100% at 4 days to 94% at 4 weeks after rash onset, then declined further to 63% at 5 weeks. Some previously vaccinated persons became IgM-negative during the third week after rash onset. In general, a single serum specimen collected between 72 h and 4 weeks after rash onset can be used to diagnose most cases of measles with an IgM capture EIA.

An early, 2-dose MV schedule was immunogenic, but a higher proportion of HIV-infected children remained susceptible to measles, compared with HIV-uninfected children (whether HIV exposed or HIV unexposed).

Serum was collected from 128 patients < or = 18 years of age admitted to the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh with new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and from 120 control-patients who were frequency-matched to case-patients for age, sex, and date of bleed. Serum was tested for IgM against 14 enterovirus serotypes: coxsackieviruses B1-B6 and A9, echoviruses 4, 6, 9, 11, 30, and 34, and enterovirus 71. Case-children 13-18 years of age were more likely than control-patients to be IgM-positive for 9 of 14 serotypes (P < or = .05 for each). In contrast, case-children 10-12 years of age and 1-9 years of age were each more likely than age-matched control-children to be IgM positive for 1 serotype (P < or = .05 for each). In addition, the association between IgM positivity and IDDM occurred earlier in girls than in boys. These data support an association between IDDM and enterovirus IgM positivity in older children.

Serum-based measles-specific IgM EIAs are the recommended laboratory assays for diagnosis of acute measles infections and appear to be sufficient for measles control programs. However, serum samples are not ideal for molecular characterization of measles virus. Although neither laboratory nor field-based diagnostic tests that rival the EIAs have been developed, laboratory surveillance could be improved if specimen collection were simplified. Ideally the collection method should be noninvasive, have no requirement for a cold chain, and/or have no requirement for technically sophisticated equipment. Two alternative specimen collection technologies appear promising and can be used for both diagnostics and for collecting pertinent genotyping information: oral fluid and filter paper collection methods. These methods are compared along with their respective utilities in supporting measles diagnosis and strain surveillance.