BackgroundDespite NUDT15 variants showing significant association with thiopurine-induced adverse events (AEs) in Asians, it remains unclear which variants of NUDT15 or whether additional genetic variants should be tested to predict AEs. To clarify the best pharmacogenetic test to be used clinically, we performed association studies of NUDT15 variants and haplotypes with AEs, genome-wide association study (GWAS) to discover additional variants, and ROC analysis to select the model to predict severe AEs.MethodsOverall, 2630 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were enrolled and genotyped for NUDT15 codon 139; 1291 patients were treated with thiopurines. diplotypes were analyzed in 970 patients, and GWASs of AEs were performed with 1221 patients using population-optimized genotyping array and imputation.ResultsWe confirmed the association of NUDT15 p.Arg139Cys with leukopenia and alopecia (p = 2.20E−63, 1.32E−69, OR = 6.59, 12.1, respectively), and found a novel association with digestive symptoms (p = 6.39E−04, OR = 1.89). Time to leukopenia was significantly shorter, and when leukopenia was diagnosed, thiopurine doses were significantly lower in Arg/Cys and Cys/Cys than in Arg/Arg. In GWASs, no additional variants were found to be associated with thiopurine-induced AEs. Despite strong correlation of leukopenia frequency with estimated enzyme activities based on the diplotypes (r2 = 0.926, p = 0.0087), there were no significant differences in the AUCs of diplotypes from those of codon 139 to predict severe AEs (AUC = 0.916, 0.921, for acute severe leukopenia, AUC = 0.990, 0.991, for severe alopecia, respectively).ConclusionsGenotyping of NUDT15 codon 139 was sufficient to predict acute severe leukopenia and alopecia in Japanese patients with IBD.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-018-1486-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
An association between FCGR3A-158 V/F polymorphism and biological responses to infliximab has been reported in Crohn's disease (CD) in Western countries. However, little is known about the mechanism by which gene polymorphism affects the responses to infliximab. The aims of this study were to confirm the association in Japanese CD patients and to reveal the effect of gene polymorphism on biological responses to infliximab. Japanese CD patients were examined retrospectively at weeks 8 and 30. Clinical and biological responses were assessed by the Crohn's disease activity index and C-reactive protein levels, respectively. The infliximab-binding affinity of natural killer (NK) cells from FCGR3A-158 V/V, V/F and F/F donors was examined. Infliximab-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activities were also determined using transmembrane TNF-α-expressing Jurkat T cells as target cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from V/V, V/F and F/F donors as effector cells. Biological responses at week 8 were statistically higher in V/V patients, whereas no significant differences were observed in either clinical responses at weeks 8 and 30 or biological responses at week 30 among the three genotypes. NK cells and PBMCs from V/V patients also showed higher infliximab-binding affinity and infliximab-mediated ADCC activity, respectively. Our results suggest that FCGR3A-158 polymorphism is a predicting factor of biological responses to infliximab in the early phases. FCGR3A-158 polymorphism was also found to affect the infliximab-binding affinity of NK cells and infliximab-mediated ADCC activity in vitro, suggesting that an effect on ADCC activity influences biological responses to infliximab in CD patients.
Background and study aims Intestinal stricture associated with Crohn’s disease (CD) is usually treated by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) or stricture plasty. Although EBD is effective and safe for such strictures, refractory stricture after EBD poses a problem. Hence, other novel approaches for these refractory strictures are required. On the other hand, the efficacy of radial incision and cutting (RIC) method for esophageal stricture after esophagogastric surgery is reported. In this pilot study, we adopted the RIC technique for five CD patients with refractory intestinal stricture to dilate their strictures. We conducted the RIC procedure using an electric needle knife with a ceramic tip on the top of the needle. Four cases were of anastomotic stricture after ileocecal resection and the remaining one case was of stricture due to mucosal healing. The RIC procedure was successful for all five patients. Average procedure time was 18.6 minutes. One patient developed delayed bleeding after RIC. There were no cases of perforation. RIC could be an alternative therapy for intestinal stricture associated with CD. Further studies should be conducted to clarify its efficacy and safety.
Background and Aim: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended to be carried out only by endoscopists with sufficient experience in gastric ESD. However, early gastric carcinoma is less common in Western countries than in Japan, and endoscopic maneuverability differs between the stomach and colorectum. We assessed the feasibility of colorectal ESD carried out by endoscopists with no or little experience in gastric ESD. Methods:We analyzed en bloc resection, R0 resection and perforation rates in 180 consecutive colorectal ESD carried out by three endoscopists who had no or <5 cases of experience in gastric ESD. We also identified factors associated with R0 resection failure.Results: Overall en bloc and R0 resection rates were 93.3% (168/180) and 82.2% (148/180), respectively. All 11 cases with perforation were treated endoscopically. Dividing 180 cases into three learning phases (early, middle, or late phases), the en bloc and R0 resection rates increased from 88.3% and 75.0% in the early phase to 98.3% and 88.3% in the late phase, respectively. Perforation rate also improved from 10.0% to 3.3%. Factors associated with R0 resection failure were location at junctions (odds ratio: 6.8, 95% CI: 1.9-27.5), preoperative factors reflecting fibrosis (5.8, 1.9-19.0), and late phase (0.2, 0.1-0.7). Conclusion: Endoscopists without experience in gastric ESDcarried out colorectal ESD safely. In the early and middle phases (≤40 cases), they should treat mainly rectal lesions but may also resect lesions in the colon avoiding flexures. Lesions located at junctions and those with preoperative factors reflecting fibrosis should be resected after completing 40 procedures.
Background Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who were under mesalamine treatment develop adverse reactions called “mesalamine allergy,” which includes high fever and worsening diarrhea. Currently, there is no method to predict mesalamine allergy. Pharmacogenomic approaches may help identify these patients. Here we analyzed the genetic background of mesalamine intolerance in the first genome-wide association study of Japanese patients with IBD. Methods Two independent pharmacogenetic IBD cohorts were analyzed: the MENDEL (n = 1523; as a discovery set) and the Tohoku (n = 788; as a replication set) cohorts. Genome-wide association studies were performed in each population, followed by a meta-analysis. In addition, we constructed a polygenic risk score model and combined genetic and clinical factors to model mesalamine intolerance. Results In the combined cohort, mesalamine-induced fever and/or diarrhea was significantly more frequent in ulcerative colitis vs Crohn’s disease. The genome-wide association studies and meta-analysis identified one significant association between rs144384547 (upstream of RGS17) and mesalamine-induced fever and diarrhea (P = 7.21e-09; odds ratio = 11.2). The estimated heritability of mesalamine allergy was 25.4%, suggesting a significant correlation with the genetic background. Furthermore, a polygenic risk score model was built to predict mesalamine allergy (P = 2.95e-2). The combined genetic/clinical prediction model yielded a higher area under the curve than did the polygenic risk score or clinical model alone (area under the curve, 0.89; sensitivity, 71.4%; specificity, 90.8%). Conclusions Mesalamine allergy was more common in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease. We identified a novel genetic association with and developed a combined clinical/genetic model for this adverse event.
A 28-year-old Japanese man presented with upper abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a soft tissue mass in the small bowel mesentery. We diagnosed the patient with sclerosing mesenteritis according to the histological findings of small bowel mesentery. Although he was treated with prednisolone, colchicine and azathioprine, neither his symptoms nor CT findings improved. This case is rare in that the disease was refractory. The characteristics of Japanese patients with sclerosing mesenteritis involving small bowel mesentery are not well understood. We herein describe the details of such patients based on a literature review including 32 recently reported Japanese cases.
Objectives. Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is widely used to treat malignant colonic obstruction. However, most reports about SEMS insertion have concentrated on the left colon. This study aimed to (1) investigate the effectiveness of SEMS insertion compared with conventional decompression tube for right-sided colonic obstruction and (2) compare the safety and technical success of SEMS insertion between left- and right-sided colonic obstructions. Methods. The data from thirty-seven patients who underwent SEMS or conventional decompression tube placement for malignant colonic obstruction in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Technical and clinical success, complications, and technical difficulties were analyzed. We compared the results between SEMS insertion and decompression tube placement in right colons and the outcomes of SEMS insertion between right- and left-sided colonic obstructions. Results. For right colons, the clinical success rate of SEMS insertion (100%) was significantly higher than that of decompression tube placement (55.9%). Concerning SEMS insertion, the technical difficulty and safety of SEMS insertion were similar between right- and left-sided colonic obstructions. Conclusion. SEMS insertion for right-sided colon is significantly more effective than conventional decompression tube placement, and this procedure was safer and less technically challenging than expected. SEMS insertion should be considered for treating right-sided malignant colonic obstruction.
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Submucosal fibrosis observed during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an important factor related to incomplete resection. Biopsy is generally accepted as having the potential to elicit submucosal fibrosis, but few reports have presented definitive proof. This study investigated the relation between submucosal fibrosis and colorectal ESD outcomes and assessed factors related to fibrosis, including pretreatment biopsy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> After reviewing 369 records of colorectal ESD performed between January 2011 and December 2016, we assessed the relation between fibrosis and ESD outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed fibrosis risk factors. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Severe fibrosis was related significantly to ESD outcomes such as the mean procedure time (<i>p <</i> 0.001), en bloc resection rate (<i>p <</i> 0.001), and R0 resection rate (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Multivariate analyses indicated residual lesions (ORs 175.4, <i>p <</i> 0.001), pretreatment biopsy (ORs 8.30, <i>p</i> = 0.002), nongranular-type laterally spreading tumors (LST-NG; ORs 5.86, <i>p</i> = 0.025), and invasive carcinoma (ORs 5.83, <i>p</i> = 0.03) as independent risk factors of severe fibrosis. In each macroscopic type, LST-NG was more strongly related to fibrosis induced by pretreatment than granular-type laterally spreading tumors with adjust ORs of 50.8 and 4.69. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pretreatment biopsy causes submucosal fibrosis resulting in prolonged procedure times and incomplete resection. These findings suggest important benefits of avoiding biopsy before ESD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.