The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that not only in vitro, but also in vivo, coinfections with Marek's disease virus (MDV) and each of the three avian retroviruses (reticuloendotheliosis virus [REV], avian lymphoid leukosis virus [ALV], and ALV-J) lead to retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) integration into MDV. A total of 306 chicken and 59 turkey commercial flocks, submitted for differential avian oncogenic virus diagnosis, served to evaluate the flock mixed virus infection rate, the rate of birds with a multiple virus infection, and the issue of retroviral LTR integration into MDV in vivo. About a quarter of the tumor-bearing commercial flocks carried a mixed MDV and retrovirus infection. A total of 2926 DNA samples were analyzed, including 2428 chicken and 498 turkey DNA samples. Of these, 991 DNAs originated from flocks with a multiple virus infection. In 103 DNA preparations from that group (103/991, 10.4%), including 38 and 56 from chicken blood and tumor tissues, respectively, and nine samples from turkey blood, multiple virus sequences were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fifty-six of the 103 samples were further analyzed by the previously developed hot spot-combined (HS-cPCR assay, of which 48% (27/56) contained chimeric MDV and retroviral LTR molecules. When extrapolated to the total samples derived from the flocks with multiple virus infection, that rate implies that about 5% of the DNA samples would carry MDV-retrovirus integration events. Several birds held a variety of chimeric molecules, indicating that several recombination events occurred simultaneously. The validation of the MDV and retroviral LTR chimeric constitution of these molecules was derived by the MDV and retroviral heterologous primers used for their creation by the HS-cPCR assay, Southern blotting and their detection by retroviral LTR probes, and LTR amplification from the gel-purified chimeric molecules. From several molecules, the LTR was sequenced, and a 161-bp retroviral LTR sequence was demonstrated. Our biochemical data imply that a recent integration occurred in the birds. The viability of recombinant viruses represented by the chimeric molecules will be further approached.
Marek's disease virus (MDV), a herpesvirus, and avian leukosis virus, subgroup J (ALV-J), a retrovirus, are oncogenic viruses of poultry. The present report describes a case-report study aimed at examining the efficacy of amplifying MDV and/or ALV-J from feather-tip DNA as compared with DNA purified from liver and spleen. We show that the polymerase chain reaction for MDV and ALV-J env using DNA from feather tips was more effective for diagnosis of naturally infected commercial chickens than using the liver and spleen.
Marek's disease virus (MDV) productive replication occurs in the feather follicle epithelium and the feather tips are valuable both for research and disease diagnosis. Three novel applications of feather tip extracts are described now: (A). As a source of DNA for amplifying either MDV and/or ALV-J. In two clinical situations a marked advantage was obtained compared to blood and organs; in broiler breeder flocks with a mixed MDV and ALV-J infection, and in young broilers with neurological Marek's disease (MD). (B). Separation of the large ( approximately 200 kbp) MDV genome directly from the infected chickens. Using pulsed field gel electrophoresis, the DNA extracted from tumors or feather tips was separated and hybridized to a 132 bp tandem repeat MDV probe. Compared to 2/55 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive tumor samples, 15/61 feather tip extracts contained whole MDV genomes. (C). Experimental MDV infection was induced by the mucosal route by dripping feather tip extract to the eye and mouth of the bird. That attempted to reproduce the native infection process, however the use of extracts, instead of dry feather dust was a compromise, aimed to synchronize the infection. In one trial, tumors were induced 6 weeks after dripping day-old broilers, while in another, feather tips were PCR positive 16 days after dripping of 2-month-old layers.
The study describes three polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems for the CVI988 vaccine virus: the meq gene, the MDV BamHI-D/H 132 bp tandem repeat fragment and the MDV-gB gene. Whereas the PCR product of virulent MDV strains and of the CVI988 virus strain with the meq and the 132 bp primer sets differed for the two templates, the MDV-gB PCR products were similar. The sensitivity of the three PCRs was determined for the two templates: the CVI988 DNA was detected up to 2.48 plaque forming units, and a MDV-1 DNA, was amplified with the 132 bp primers up to the 10(-3) DNA dilution, and up to the 10(-2) with the MDV-gB and meq gene primers. As conventional detection for the CVI988 vaccine virus is by tissue culture, the aim was to analyse the feasibility of the molecular detection of the vaccine virus in the vaccinated chick. In two experimental trials employing specific pathogen free and commercial Lohmann chicks, respectively, the vaccine virus replicated to a limited extent; it was detected only in the spleen of up to 60% chicks at 2-4 weeks and in one chick at 3 weeks, respectively. The survey of three commercial Lohmann flocks, kept in biosecurity conditions, revealed the vaccine virus only in the spleen of 40% of 30-day-old chicks. The present study shows that CV1988 DNA is present in vaccinated chicks in a low quantity and it is difficult to detect directly from the chick, probably because vaccine viruses are latent in vivo. For an efficient detection it is pertinent to cultivate the vaccine virus on chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF), as then the virus escapes the latent state, enters into the productive mode of replication, and a high viral copy number is produced.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.