Background The Madagascar National Strategic Plan for Malaria Control 2018 (NSP) outlines malaria control pre-elimination strategies that include detailed goals for mosquito control. Primary surveillance protocols and mosquito control interventions focus on indoor vectors of malaria, while many potential vectors feed and rest outdoors. Here we describe the application of tools that advance our understanding of diversity, host choice, and Plasmodium infection in the Anopheline mosquitoes of the Western Highland Fringe of Madagascar. Methodology/Principal findings We employed a modified barrier screen trap, the QUadrant Enabled Screen Trap (QUEST), in conjunction with the recently developed multiplex BLOOdmeal Detection Assay for Regional Transmission (BLOODART). We captured a total of 1252 female Anopheles mosquitoes (10 species), all of which were subjected to BLOODART analysis. QUEST collection captured a heterogenous distribution of mosquito density, diversity, host choice, and Plasmodium infection. Concordance between Anopheles morphology and BLOODART species identifications ranged from 93–99%. Mosquito feeding behavior in this collection frequently exhibited multiple blood meal hosts (single host = 53.6%, two hosts = 42.1%, three hosts = 4.3%). The overall percentage of human positive bloodmeals increased between the December 2017 and the April 2018 timepoints (27% to 44%). Plasmodium positivity was frequently observed in the abdomens of vectors considered to be of secondary importance, with an overall prevalence of 6%. Conclusions/Significance The QUEST was an efficient tool for sampling exophilic Anopheline mosquitoes. Vectors considered to be of secondary importance were commonly found with Plasmodium DNA in their abdomens, indicating a need to account for these species in routine surveillance efforts. Mosquitoes exhibited multiple blood feeding behavior within a gonotrophic cycle, with predominantly non-human hosts in the bloodmeal. Taken together, this complex feeding behavior could enhance the role of multiple Anopheline species in malaria transmission, possibly tempered by zoophilic feeding tendencies.
Current malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) contain antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum-specific histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2), Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), and aldolase in various combinations. Low or high parasite densities/target antigen concentrations may influence the accuracy and sensitivity of PfHRP2-detecting RDTs. We analyzed the SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/Pan RDT performance in relation to P. falciparum parasitemia in Madagascar, where clinical Plasmodium vivax malaria exists alongside P. falciparum. Nine hundred sixty-three samples from patients seeking care for suspected malaria infection were analyzed by RDT, microscopy, and Plasmodium species-specific, ligase detection reaction-fluorescent microsphere assay (LDR-FMA). Plasmodium infection positivity by these diagnostics was 47.9%, 46.9%, and 58%, respectively. Plasmodium falciparum-only infections were predominant (microscopy, 45.7%; LDR-FMA, 52.3%). In all, 16.3% of P. falciparum, 70% of P. vivax, and all of Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale, and mixed-species infections were submicroscopic. In 423 P. falciparum mono-infections, confirmed by microscopy and LDR-FMA, the parasitemia in those who were positive for both the PfHRP2 and pan-pLDH test bands was significantly higher than that in those who were positive only for the PfHRP2 band (P < 0.0001). Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia in those that were detected as P. falciparum-only infections by microscopy but P. falciparum mixed infections by LDR-FMA also showed similar outcome by the RDT band positivity. In addition, we used varying parasitemia (3-0.0001%) of the laboratory-maintained 3D7 strain to validate this observation. A positive pLDH band in high P. falciparum-parasitemic individuals may complicate diagnosis and treatment, particularly when the microscopy is inconclusive for P. vivax, and the two infections require different treatments.
Anopheles mosquitoes vary in habitat preference, feeding pattern, and susceptibility to various measures of vector control. Consequently, it is important that we identify reservoirs of disease, identify vectors, and characterize feeding patterns to effectively implement targeted control measures. Using 467 anopheline mosquito abdomen squashes captured in Madagascar, we designed a novel ligase detection reaction and fluorescent microsphere assay, dubbed Bloodmeal Detection Assay for Regional Transmission (BLOODART), to query the bloodmeal content, identify five Anopheles mosquito species, and detect Plasmodium infection. Validation of mammalian bloodspots was achieved by preparation and analysis of known hosts (singular and mixed), sensitivity to degradation and storage method were assessed through mosquito feeding experiments, and quantification was explored by altering ratios of two mammal hosts. BLOODART identifications were validated by comparison with mosquito samples identified by sequenced portions of the internal transcribed spacer 2. BLOODART identification of control mammal bloodspots was 100% concordant for singular and mixed mammalian blood. BLOODART was able to detect hosts up to 42 hours after digestion when mosquito samples were stored in ethanol. A mammalian host was identified in every field-collected, blood-fed female Anopheles mosquito by BLOODART. The predominant mosquito host was cow (n = 451), followed by pig (n = 26) and human (n = 25). Mixed species bloodmeals were commonly observed (n = 33). A BLOODART molecular identification was successful for 318/467 mosquitoes, with an overall concordance of 60% with all field-captured, morphologically identified Anopheles specimens. BLOODART enables characterization of large samples and simultaneous pathogen detection to monitor and incriminate disease vectors in Madagascar.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.