In areas with shallow water flow, additional casing strings are normally set to seal off the water-bearing zone. While drilling the first well in Fram East in the North Sea, the operator used a shallow 20-in. surface casing, but this measure increased well costs and caused a number of later limitations in the well construction process. To avoid these complications in other Fram East wells, the operator searched for alternative solutions.It selected a cement design with properties compensating for the loss of hydrostatic pressure and thereby preventing the water flowing. The service company carried out extensive designing and testing of the cement formulations. A major challenge was qualifying the final design for a full-scale field test. A third-party laboratory qualified the cement system, using a modified setup of the gas migration equipment. The results were promising.A dedicated cutting injection well was chosen for the field test. The successful test allowed planning the remaining wells using the new system with projected savings of more than USD 20 million. This paper will describe the development of the solution, the design, and testing of the cement formulation, and the full-scale field test performed. IntroductionThe main objective of the cement is to provide a hydraulic seal across the various permeable formations; zonal isolation is compromised when formation fluids such as water are allowed to enter the annulus. During and after the placement, the cement column and the other fluids in the wellbore or annulus exert a hydrostatic pressure that initially must be greater than the formation pore pressure to prevent invasion of formation fluids. However, as the cement hydrates, the cement slurry becomes self-supporting and the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the slurry decreases. When the hydrostatic pressure decreases below the formation pore pressure, formation fluids such as water can enter the annulus, potentially leading to water flow through the cement matrix, which leads to the loss of hydraulic isolation.
A dedicated injector well, located in the Grane field in the Norwegian North Sea, was chosen as a candidate for application of a novel new sealant. The injector well, drilled for disposal of cuttings and produced water, was selected because of expected temperature and pressure cycling during the injection operation, and the risk of cement sheath integrity failure. This paper will discuss the design, execution, and evaluation of this injector well. Stress modeling indicated that as wellbore temperature decreased from bottomhole static to injection temperature and as bottomhole pressure cycled between static and dynamic conditions, conventional cement would fail in tension and create a microannulus. In view of these challenges, a redesigned the cement program, which incorporated stress analysis calculations and mechanical-properties testing provided a sealant material that would resist failure due to excessive wellbore stresses. The redesign required three steps;. Firstly, it was necessary to calculate temperature and pressure variations expected in the wellbore during injection. Next, temperature and pressure variations in the wellbore were evaluated using numerical analysis. Finally, a sealant was engineered so that its integrity would be maintained when exposed to repeated temperature and pressure cycles. The chosen sealant material incorporated flexible and expanding materials within an optimized particle size distribution blend. The sealant's mechanical properties were engineered in line with expected stresses to minimize the Young's modulus and improve bonding properties. The cuttings-disposal injector well was drilled, cased, and cemented using the new sealant material. Since placement, the well has been logged with sonic and ultrasonic tools and these data indicated an excellent bonding response. The well has now been used as an injector for more than two years with no indication of fluid communication in the annulus or loss of cement sheath integrity. Significantly, since this first application, which incorporated the successful of modeling of the expected stresses and the engineering of a sealant to manage these stresses, further injector wells have been cemented utilizing the same engineering approach. Introduction and History of Grane Grane field was discovered in 1991, located in 127 m water depth and approximately 100 km off the coast of Norway (Fig. 1). A template with 40 slots, of which 27 were allocated as oil producer wells, was installed on the seabed. 12 of the wells were pre-drilled on the template with a semi-submersible rig. The Grane platform was then installed in 2002 and the pre-drilled wells were tied back and completed prior to continued drilling from the platform (Fig. 2). With some of the strictest emission and environmental controls in the world in place in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea, the need to find new and alternative disposal methods led the operator to dedicate specific wells for the injection and re-injection duties (referred to only as "injection" for the remaining sections of the paper). Owing to the zero-discharge-to-the-sea policy, the operator dedicated one of the predrilled wells as a disposal well. The Grane injection well was designed with the following operational limitations:An average cuttings re-injection rate of 100 m3/d [630 bbls/d]An operating wellhead injection pressure of 6.0–8.0 MPa [870–1160 psi]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.