These results indicate that increased experience decreases the risk of pouch-related complications and that with time the functional results remain stable, but the failure rate increases.

BackgroundThis manuscript summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance, terminology used, and interpretation of anorectal function testing including anorectal manometry (focused on high‐resolution manometry), the rectal sensory test, and the balloon expulsion test. Based on these measurements, a classification system for disorders of anorectal function is proposed.MethodsTwenty‐nine working group members (clinicians/academics in the field of gastroenterology, coloproctology, and gastrointestinal physiology) were invited to six face‐to‐face and three remote meetings to derive consensus between 2014 and 2018.Key recommendationsThe IAPWG protocol for the performance of anorectal function testing recommends a standardized sequence of maneuvers to test rectoanal reflexes, anal tone and contractility, rectoanal coordination, and rectal sensation. Major findings not seen in healthy controls defined by the classification are as follows: rectoanal areflexia, anal hypotension and hypocontractility, rectal hyposensitivity, and hypersensitivity. Minor and inconclusive findings that can be present in health and require additional information prior to diagnosis include anal hypertension and dyssynergia.Conclusions and InferencesThis framework introduces the IAPWG protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function based on objective physiological measurement. The use of a common language to describe results of diagnostic tests, standard operating procedures, and a consensus classification system is designed to bring much‐needed standardization to these techniques.

ObjectiveTo assess long-term outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) with specific emphasis on patient sex, childbirth, and age. Summary Background DataChildbirth and the process of aging affect pelvic floor and anal sphincter function independently. Early function after IPAA is good for most patients. Nonetheless, there are concerns about the impact of the aging process as well as pregnancy on long-term functional outcomes after IPAA. MethodsFunctional outcomes using a standardized questionnaire were prospectively assessed for each patient on an annual basis. ResultsOf the 1,454 patients who underwent IPAA for CUC between 1981 and 1994, 1,386 were part of this study. Median age was 32 years. Median length of follow-up was 8 years. Pelvic sepsis was the primary cause of pouch failure irrespective of sex or age. Functional outcomes were comparable between men and women. Eighty-five women who became pregnant after IPAA had pouch function, which was comparable with women who did not have a child. Daytime and nocturnal incontinence affected older patients more frequently than younger ones. Incontinence became more common the longer the follow-up in older patients, but this was not found in younger patients. Poor anal function led to pouch excision in only 3 of 204 older patients. ConclusionsIncontinence rates were significantly higher in older patients after IPAA for CUC compared with younger patients. However, this did not contribute to a greater risk of pouch failure in these older patients. Patient sex and uncomplicated childbirth did not affect long-term functional outcomes.Early reports of function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) have indicated favorable outcomes, with an excellent quality of life for more than 90% of patients.1-3 Areas of concern remain, however, regarding long-term functional outcome after vaginal delivery and the natural aging process, which may affect pelvic floor function regardless of sex. 4,5 Chronic ulcerative colitis has a bimodal distribution of incidence based on age, with a peak at 25 years and a second peak at 60 years.6 A selected group of older patients choose, in the absence of contraindications, to undergo IPAA. Short-term follow-up has shown that such patients may have comparable or only marginally worse functional outcomes compared with younger patients. 7-9Our aim was to assess long-term outcomes after IPAA for CUC with specific reference to the impact of age, aging, and childbirth to determine how these factors affect the incidence of pouch failure. METHODSBetween January 1981 and December 1994, 762 men and 692 women were identified from the Mayo Ileal Pouch Registry as having undergone proctocolectomy, endoanal mucosal resection, and hand-sewn ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis for CUC. Ethical permission to review patient records was obtained from the Institutional Review Board.

ObjectiveThe authors' aim was to determine survival and recurrence rates in patients undergoing resection of rectal cancer achieved by abdominoperineal resection (APR), coloanal anastomosis (CM), and anterior resection (AR) without adjuvant therapy. Summary Background DataThe surgery of rectal cancer is controversial; so, too, is its adjuvant management. Questions such as preoperative versus postoperative radiation versus no radiation are key. An approach in which the entire mesorectum is excised has been proposed as yielding low recurrence rates. MethodsOf 1423 patients with resected rectal cancers, 491 patients were excluded, leaving 932 with a primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated at Mayo. Eighty-six percent were resected for cure. Surgery plus adjuvant treatment was performed in 418, surgery alone in 514. These 514 patients are the subject of this review. Among the 514 patients who underwent surgery alone, APR was performed in 169, CM in 19, AR in 272, and other procedures in 54. Eighty-seven percent of patients were operated on with curative intent. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years; follow-up was complete in 92%.APR and CM were performed excising the envelope of rectal mesentery posteriorly and the supporting tissues laterally from the sacral promontory to the pelvic floor. AR was performed using an appropriately wide rectal mesentery resection technique if the tumor was high; if the tumor was in the middle or low rectum, all mesentery was resected. The mean distal margin achieved by AR was 3 ± 2 cm. ResultsMortality was 2% (12 of 514). Anastomotic leaks after AR occurred in 5% (16 of 291) and overall transient urinary retention in 15%. Eleven percent of patients had a wound infection (abdominal and perineal wound, 30-day, purulence, or cellulitis).The local recurrence and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 7% and 78%, respectively, after AR; 6% and 83%, respectively, after CM; and 4% and 80%, respectively, after APR. Patients with stage Ill disease, had a 60% disease-free survival rate. ConclusionsComplete resection of the envelope of supporting tissues about the rectum during APR, CM, and AR when tumors were low in the rectum is associated with low mortality, low morbidity, low local recurrence, and good 5-year survival rates. Appropriate "tumor-specific" mesorectal excision during AR when the tumor is high in the rectum is likewise consistent with a low rate of local recurrence and good long-term survival. However, the overall failure rate of40% in stage Ill disease (which is independent of surgical technique) means that surgical approaches alone are not sufficient to achieve better long-term survival rates.

Alteration in visceral sensation locally at the site of presumed symptom origin in the gastrointestinal tract has been proposed as an important etiopathological mechanism in the so-called functional bowel disorders. Patients presenting with one functional gastrointestinal syndrome, however, frequently have additional symptoms referable to other parts of the gut, suggesting that enhanced visceral nociception may be a panintestinal phenomenon. We measured the sensory thresholds for initial perception (IP), desire to defecate (DD), and urgency (U) in response to rectal balloon distension, and the thresholds for initial perception and for discomfort in response to esophageal balloon distension in 12 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and 10 patients with functional dyspepsia (FD), in comparison with healthy controls. As expected, IBS patients exhibited lower rectal sensory thresholds than controls (P < 0.0001), but in addition had significantly lower sensory thresholds for both perception and discomfort evoked by balloon distension of the esophagus (mean +/- SEM: 8.8 +/- 1.3 ml vs 12.1 +/- 1.5 ml (P < 0.05) and 12.2 +/- 1.4 ml vs 16.4 +/- 1.4 ml (P < 0.02) respectively. Patients with FD showed similarly enhanced esophageal sensitivity, with thresholds for perception and discomfort of 8.1 +/- 0.9 ml (P < 0.02), and 10.1 +/- 1.0 ml (p < 0.001), respectively, but were also found to have sensory thresholds for rectal distension similar to those observed in the IBS group, significantly lower than in controls: IP 45.0 +/- 17.6 vs 59.3 +/- 1.5 ml (P < 0.001), DD 98.0 +/- 17.9 vs 298.7 +/- 9.0 ml (P < 0.0001), U 177.2 +/- 25.4 vs 415.1 +/- 12.6 ml (p < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)